View Full Version : Restoring the woman in the rose shawl


Caitlin
03-17-2005, 03:18 AM
Hi Everyone,

I just recently became interested in photo restoration, having unearthed all my parents photos and slides that were mouldy and in very poor condition. My mother let an elderly friend in her 80's know I had just bought a new scanner and printer, and she asked if I could improve on the job done for her by a 'professional' photo restorer on the attached image.

In my opinion the professional job was very poor and I was sure I could do better. It was very grainy, blurry, and printed badly so it had a newsprint look.

The biggest challenge though was that the original photo cut off the top of her forehead, and she wanted it recreated. This was the most challenging part of this project, and I know I haven't been totally successful. Part of the problem I had is there was no really useful hair in the photo to sample from.

I've attached 4 photos - The original image, the professional restoration job that I was aiming to beat, the sepia restoration I did, as well as a quick colourising job for fun.

This is my first real attempt at restoring so I'd be really interested to get any feedback. I'm pretty confident that I did better than the original restoration, but I know there is still a lot to learn.

philbach
03-17-2005, 07:58 AM
Well you are doing well. And welcome to Retouch Pro. Its one thing to read about it in a book and another to actually get going and produce something. Your colorized restoration was a good attempt. It did have a yellow cast to it in general and her hair looked a tad flat. The contrast was a little low too. I took your picture your restoration and using a levels adjustment layer increased the contrast (I also blew out the highlights in the background). I adjusted the color by adding magenta to it. I searched the web via Google Images and scrounged up some hair that I added to make her hair look more "real."

Gary Richardson
03-17-2005, 01:29 PM
Hi Caitlin,

Welcome to RP. Firstly, congratulations on a fine restore. It is much superior to the so called "professional job".

I've adjusted a couple of things on your restored image.
Firstly the woman's right eye (left as you look at it) looked a little odd, and did'nt flatter her. So I copied her left iris, and pasted it over the right.

I also added a little texture to her hair, using a textured brush. I sampled the hair colour, then painted on highlights and shadows, using tones slightly lighter and darker than the sampled colour.

Hope this helps.

Duv
03-17-2005, 01:49 PM
Tasty job Caitlin! Well done! Maybe nothing more than personal taste but I thought darkening the eyebrows and eyes a bit would add a little more mystery.

Roughly selected eyes, eyebrows. Contro J to put it on its own layer. Layers adjustment to darken slightly. Used low opacity eraser to bring back skin but left the area below the eyebrows a little darker.
Also applied a slight S curve adjustment for contrast.

Cheers
Dave

barry_uk
03-17-2005, 02:11 PM
I agree with Phil you did a great job, just the hair bit lets it down I have had a dabble hope you didn't mind, All I did was recoloured and added hair look alike, Just a quicky to show you example what it's possablitys are looking like adding hair..

Regards Barry

Caitlin
03-17-2005, 03:22 PM
Gary & Duv - your comments about the eyes are spot on! I hadn't thought to fixup the right eye, but it's obviously an improvement.

The paleness of the eyes was the only negative feedback I got from the old lady herself (you may have noticed that eyeliner and eyebrows have been sketched in roughly in PENCIL on the original - so she obviously always wanted more eye makeup *lol*) I had removed these to get closer to the original - a bad call.

The colour cast is because I hadn't really planned out my aim - so I made it all vaguelly sepia early on, THEN had the idea to colourise. I'll go back and try to fix that up. Using Levels & curves isn't something I've tried to learn yet so I've been doing all my colour and contrast modification by eye. It's top of my list though - obviously I'm struggling a bit without it.

I should reveal a guilty secret now and admit I actually used the 'pro' restoration hair to start my head reconstruction - which is why it is so lacking in detail! I actually had to do a bit of work to remove all the grain. I had a search through google without finding anything else suitable (most is too low resolution of course) She has a distinct widow's peak, and her hair was long and pulled back.

Flora
03-18-2005, 08:31 AM
Hi Caitlin,

Welcome to RP! :pleased:

Great job in both your restorations!! ... I agree that 'your' hair is a bit on the 'solid block' side, but your restoration is ways better than the "professional job" !!!! :bigthmb:

As you said, ...there was no really useful hair in the photo to sample from. ... so, in my quick try, I made it anew using a hair brush ....

Following Dave's pointer (.. he has an incredible eye for these details!!!), I also applied a light digital eye-shadow to minimize the eyes' paleness .... I didn't replace her right eye but I think that Gary is absolutely right!!!

Caitlin
03-18-2005, 02:58 PM
Flora that hair is superb! Can you give me some more detailed tips on how you achieved it? Or is it just painstaking hand drawn lines?

limaze
03-18-2005, 03:27 PM
yes i agree, that manually created hair by flora looks very good and id love to know more about that technique too :)

Flora
03-18-2005, 05:17 PM
Caitlin, limaze,

thank you so much for your kind comments!!! :pleased:

I'ts past 2 AM in my 'corner' of the world .... :tired: :tired:

Tomorrow I'll write the details on how I 'made' the hair ... in the mean time, you could download Dave Nagel's free Hair brushes from here (http://www.creativemac.com/common/search/NewSearch.jsp?keywords=adobe+photoshop%2C+brushes%2C+custom+brushes%2C+skin+textures%2C+uv+mapping&Search=Search&articleType=425&sites=All&matchFor=Any&searchDepth=1500&sortBy=Relevance&numPerPage=100&siteid=All) .. (the one I used is in his Photoshop Brushes, Series 23 ... but while you are there, you could check the others as well ... It's really worth it!!!)

Gary Richardson
03-19-2005, 12:50 AM
Thanks for the link Flora. Unfortunately the brushes only work for CS, and I'm on PS7. Oh well, back to creating my brushes by hand.

Flora
03-19-2005, 09:56 AM
Hi,

Gary,

So sorry about that :o: , .... I attached a sample of the Brush and maybe you can duplicate it for usage in other PS version ....

Caitlin, limaze,

After 'reconstructing' the missing part, I was also left with a rather 'solid hair block' ... (Starting Point in Attachment 2) ... here is what I did to 'make ' the hair ...

The brush I used for 'making' the hair is number 13 of the NagelSerie 23.
In Attachment 1 you can see what it looks like and how it works using different colours ...

Restoring the picture, I also used two colours sampled from dark and light areas of the image, and painted the hair trying to achieve a 3D 'feeling' ...

I had to change the 'direction' of the brush a few times .... In Photoshop CS this can be achieved by opening the 'Brush Presets>Brush Tip Shape' and moving the point of the arrow of the cross-hair shape inside the circle .... (actually, while in the 'Brush Presets', you could experiment changing just about everything in a brush and see the results you get!!! :wink: .. ).

For each pass, I created a new blank Layer and worked on it ... all the Layers' Opacity is 100% ; the Blending > Normal for all but one which I changed to Overlay. (This can be seen from my attachments).

I kept the Brush Opacity between 20 and 50% .... I painted in several steps since I rather build the intensity gradually.

That said, it was very easy and quick as I painted in smooth, longish strokes along her face first, and on the rest of the hair later. (see Attachments 2-4 for the steps..)

You can play with Brush and Layer Opacity and Blendings until you are satisfied with the result .... Finally, you can use a very light Gaussian Blur for smoother blending ...

Hope this helps ....

Gary Richardson
03-19-2005, 12:21 PM
Thanks for the brush detail Flora, I'm sure I can have a go at creating something similar.

Nice job on the hair, but then I'd have expected nothing less from you. (Hope you can live under the strain of anticipated perfection we all put on you.)

limaze
03-19-2005, 12:30 PM
hello flora, thanks for your little tutorial. i really like how your posts always look so structured and sedulous (i hope this is the right word ;).

byRo
03-19-2005, 01:41 PM
......so structured and sedulous (i hope this is the right word ;).

sed·u·lous (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=10&q=sedulous) : Persevering and constant in effort or application; assiduous.

Didn't know that one. Think you've found a nice word there. :wink:


Caitlin
03-20-2005, 05:13 AM
Flora, thanks so much for your detailed description. I haven't had another go as yet - you make it sound so easy, but I suspect it will be a bit more tricky for me! *lol*

Do I also detect a highlight added to create the shape of the hair, or is that in the brush strokes also?

I can see I will be learning a lot around here. I have several more quite tricky photos I'm itching to work on, but want to learn a bit more before I tackle the personally valuable ones.

Flora
03-20-2005, 11:37 AM
Gary,

thanks again for your kindness! :pleased:
...just yell if you need more details on the brushes...

limaze,

thank you so much for your great comment.. :pleased:

Glad I could help .... and thank you for teaching me a new word!!!! :thumbsup: :thumbsup: (like Roland, hadn't heard that one before!!!!)

Caitlin,

Do I also detect a highlight added to create the shape of the hair....
Tha's all done with the brush .... sorry I didn't really specify it but that's what I meant by:
Restoring the picture, I also used two colours sampled from dark and light areas of the image, and painted the hair trying to achieve a 3D 'feeling'
The 'highlights' are brush strokes of colour sampled from the lightest parts of the picture .... and you'll see that it's really not difficult ... :wink:

Glad I could be of help ... and don't hesitate to contact me should you have more questions ...

Caitlin
04-17-2005, 07:26 AM
It took me a while to get stuck into this again. I think the hair problem was intimidating me a bit!

Anyway, after a bit of nagging from my mother who wanted to know when her friend would get her original photo back again :dizzy: , I started afresh, and tried to be a bit more careful with the skin texture, and particularly worked on highlighting the eyes.

I had a go with the hair brush Flora, and it is rather wonderful to work with, and has shown me yet another vast area of photoshop that is completely new to me. I haven't got anywhere near proficient with it yet though - I wonder what size brush you used? I'm going to keep working on this. I haven't got anywhere close to your wonderful version - It's better than my previous 'grey block' but still not completely realistic....

I have another little challenge too, which to be honest I'm not sure I will attempt. I got feedback when I delivered the first retouch I did, as well as a desire for darker eyes, the lady in question remembers that the shawl was over her hair - ie. more like the 'professionally restored' version. To me this looks unnatural, and the way I've done it seems more logical, but the customer is always right! (mind you I'm doing this for free!).

Any feedback most welcome!! :classic:

(Previous attempt is here (http://www.retouchpro.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=19018))

ps. oh - and I used your eyelashes brushes as well Flora - thanks!

pps. Curses!! I just realised I saved my psd file after resizing for the web!! :bawling: *sigh* hours work down the tube. At least I have a save from yesterday...

Flora
04-18-2005, 03:06 PM
Hi Caitlin,

that is just great :thumbsup: ..... I can't remember right now the size of the brush .... but I'll try to go over it again and find out ....

I think 'your' hair is very realistic now, I'd just try to liven it up a bit by painting some highlights (very soft white brush 10% Opacity) on an empty 'overlay' layer on top ....

ps. oh - and I used your eyelashes brushes as well Flora - thanks!
Great!!! Glad they come in handy .... I'll post them in the 'resources' as well ... :pleased:

Flora
04-18-2005, 03:59 PM
me again....

...The brush size I started with is 21 px .... I increased or decreased the size (very slightly) depending on the hair part I was working on ...

In my attachment I applied the 'Overlay' enhancement to 'your hair ....

Gary Richardson
04-19-2005, 12:32 AM
And it works wonderfully. It's that attention to detail that really makes the difference. I learn a little more from you each time, thanks.

Caitlin
04-26-2005, 04:55 AM
I have finally handed over the finished product, and I believe the lady is happy with the results. I don't know that I am completely, but it's time to move on!

For some reason I couldn't get my head around your overlay technique Flora, so I ended out simply using the dodge tool instead to create some highlights on the hair. Variations of layers is something I really need to read up on as talk of overlay, darken, lighten etc still leave me baffled!

Thanks to everyone for your tremendous help!! This was my first post to the forum, and I feel I've learned so much in that time (I hope you can see some of that in my original attempt vs. this latest one!) :pleased:

You will notice the lady in the rose shawl - is now wearing blue! I just got lazy - I thought this colour looked nicer and the lady hadn't asked for a colour version anyway :)

Flora
04-26-2005, 05:05 AM
Thanks Gary!!! :happy:

Caitlin,

Simply terrific!!!! :bigthmb: :bigthmb: :bigthmb:

For some reason I couldn't get my head around your overlay technique Flora,....It's only the method I use .... the result is what counts ... no matter how you get there!!! :wink: