We are looking for a Freelance Retoucher, that has experience with High-End Product Retouching for Cosmetics and Fragrances.


We are looking for someone to work in our studio, as needed, per project
(in New York City).


We would like to discuss this further, and see samples of your work.


Please call us, our studio # is 212.741.3764



Jill Leigh
for Paul Tillinghast

We are looking for someone to work in our studio, as needed, per project
(in New York City).
Why would a retoucher need to physically work in your studio?

Why would a retoucher need to physically work in your studio?
I wouldn't know. But it would be nice to know why you needed to post this question 8 months after this thread was started ? :tired:

I think the job would have gone by now, don't you :eek:

I wouldn't know. But it would be nice to know why you needed to post this question 8 months after this thread was started ? :tired:
Maybe because the thread's age is irrelevant to the question?
I think the job would have gone by now, don't you :eek:
Wouldn't know. Haven't the foggiest what the retoucher market in NY is doing. Do you?

It is bad practise to dig up old threads in this way, and could only end up rubbing some members up the wrong way. Digging up an old thread for no reason, just puts new threads down the listings.
Your asking a question to someone who has made 1 post and never returned !!! You are also asking a question that really serves no purpose, as the job is advertised "as seen".

We would like to discuss this further, and see samples of your work.
Please call us, our studio # is 212.741.3764

Why would a retoucher need to physically work in your studio?


Because they could very well be working with high profile images that need to stay in studio....or have a NDA attached to them.

There is such a thing as in house retouchers you know, and freelance doesn't necessarily mean "from home"

Oh this cracks me up...did you bother to check the dates of the posts above yours???

To "new to this site", a topic becomes promoted upon posting, the original date of this ad was 31st October 2005....The search engines bring up everything, don't they? .......regardless of date