View Full Version : Is it repairable ? Image that have no depth and sufficient information. ashkumar 11-28-2005, 04:23 AM Hi !
I've attached an image, which is critical to improve. Give me suggestions or anyone can resotore or retouch it please submit back.
Thanks.
Ashkumar Cassidy 11-28-2005, 04:30 AM The picture is really too small to see much detail or see what it needs properly. At that size, it looks like a bit of sharpening and contrast would do the trick to improve it. philbach 11-28-2005, 04:53 AM Well a larger file would be helpful. For information on how to post image attachments to this forum clickHERE (http://www.retouchpro.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7933) .
I used levels adjustment layer in photoshop as well as screen blending modes on parts of the picture (face). Since it is quite blurry I sharpened the image as well. ashkumar 11-28-2005, 05:59 AM Thank You ! I'm submitting Larger file for further improvement. Cassidy 11-28-2005, 06:45 AM Well I adjusted the levels, did a little cloning mainly on the background, did a highpass layer and painted out the extraneous noise, adjusted the saturation, did a gaussian blur and then did another highpass overlay, once again painting out the extraneous noise. Image is still noisy, but has detail ashkumar 11-28-2005, 08:25 AM I think we can do more work to make it eye looking image. If anyone make painting by photoshop please show me.
Ashkumar Cassidy 11-28-2005, 08:28 AM Ashkumar, we are a helping lot, not a freebie lot here. Hard to put back what is not present. Personally think your last comment is insulting and rude and presumptuous. I acknowledge we may be dealing with a language barrier here. If I was charging you, consider it as being $75 ashkumar 11-28-2005, 09:06 AM Don't angry with me. I'm also professional retoucher and know most of the possibilities but by above posting I want to know ending possibilites of this type of problematic images. Care my emotions, don't go professionally, hope for the +ve response. Cassidy 11-28-2005, 09:09 AM Don't angry with me. I'm also professional retoucher and know most of the possibilities but by above posting I want to know ending possibilites of this type of problematic images. Care my emotions, don't go professionally, hope for the +ve response.
Well then look within, and be satisfied, surely then you realise that is not what is there is hardly a given. Dont look like an imp with a limp, looking to survey the kind hearted, I already have a disabled child who knows how to milk the system for sympathy. For my bit, think I need to see some incentive from you, actually, thiink the $ component has struck a chord so far, sorry philbach 11-28-2005, 03:13 PM Well I did the usual. I did replace the background. I did not do any eye work. I used a copy of the face selection using screen mode which helped and then used a levels adjustment layer.also neat image. ashkumar 11-28-2005, 11:39 PM I'm attaching image which I've improved, hope for your opinions that I'm going right or not ? or where I'm missing.
Ashkumar Cassidy 11-29-2005, 04:30 AM Looking good Ashkumar.
Still looks a little blurry, so I took your version and converted to lab and ran the unsharp mask on the lightness layer which didn't seem to do too much, so I then converted back to rgb and ran a highpass filter on a duplicate layer in overlay mode. Panpan 11-29-2005, 09:42 AM Hello Ashkumar
I thought your version had too much saturation and not enough contrast. I also modified the mouth a little so it's closer to the original.
Pierre bart_hickman 11-29-2005, 06:07 PM That's a good idea, but I think those replacement eyes need to be increased in size (the lips also look too small.)
Bart Kraellin 11-29-2005, 11:10 PM had a go also...
Craig Serissa 11-30-2005, 12:30 PM I thought I would give this a try, After doing all the usual things, I added some noise and smudged and painted in overlay in some areas. It may be a bit dark, I find it hard to lighten without bringing back all the noise. Kraellin 11-30-2005, 01:33 PM had another go at this one. this time i dodged the eyes and manually cleaned up some of the noise.
Craig twinkissed 11-30-2005, 01:54 PM I'm attaching image which I've improved, hope for your opinions that I'm going right or not ? or where I'm missing.
Ashkumar
I think the eyes look too fake. That's my honest opinion. Kraellin 11-30-2005, 02:04 PM i think the reason the eyes look 'fake' is that the sharpness of the eyes doesnt match the sharpness of the rest of the image. this is why i used the dodge tool on the whites of the eyes.
Craig |