tomvason
09-29-2006, 09:25 PM
I'm curious as to how any of you would handle this photo. I've scanned it a dozen ways with a dozen settings and can get nothing more "clear" that this. Would appreciate any input.
Thanks,
Tom
Thanks,
Tom
| View Full Version : Exposure: What would you do with this? tomvason 09-29-2006, 09:25 PM I'm curious as to how any of you would handle this photo. I've scanned it a dozen ways with a dozen settings and can get nothing more "clear" that this. Would appreciate any input. Thanks, Tom pepperspray 09-30-2006, 02:34 AM Hi, there. :) What scale/res did you scan this in at? Did you try scanning at 200% scale, 600dpi, and 16bit? That can help bring in some detail and colour information that might be missed in a smaller scan. What scanner do you use? (Make/model) Also, are you able to post a larger image here? The one you have is a little too small to work with. philbach 09-30-2006, 05:30 AM Well I noticed that the facial features of the lady were quite flat; being all about the same amount of luminosity. I ran the cursor across the forehead and did notice a slight difference with luminance running from about 203 to 217. So I ran a curves adjustment layer with two points. 216 input to 216 output and a second point at input 202 to output 173 or something like that. That increased the contrast between these small differences. That may be helpful in this case. tomvason 09-30-2006, 06:10 AM Thanks for the replies. I will rescan it at a larger scale. However, I tried and tried to get this file to post and never could get it within the acceptable size range without it being so small. Tried every way I know at least. Any suggestions would be helpful! Thanks, Tom irshgrlkc 09-30-2006, 07:12 AM I assume you are using the save for web dialog to make a jpg for the forum. If so, what I tend to do once there is: 1. Click on the image size tab and make my picture around 800 pixels wide 2. Then click on the little gray arrow (see where I have the red arrow) and select Optimize to File Size 3. I usually put 95 k to fit within the guidelines of the site. Then save. If when I put in the 95k file size the image quality isn't very good, I then adjust the image size some more. You might want to try this and then reupload your image. philbach 09-30-2006, 07:14 AM CLICK HERE (http://www.retouchpro.com/forums/image-help/9077-size-quality-attached-images.html#post75171) tomvason 09-30-2006, 08:38 AM Here it is again. Mabye this is a little better. Thanks for all the input! philbach 09-30-2006, 09:47 AM Yeah a nice attachment. Well I did the same with her. With him I decreased the contrast again using curves. I used neat image to remove the noise and the healing brushes in various places. Flora 10-01-2006, 05:18 AM Hi, in my opinion, there isn't much that can be done with this image ... :o: Rather 'flat' as Phil pointed put, and with 'blocked' shadows... You can go only so far in lifting the shadows as, from a certain point, you only uncover solid grey blocks containing no details whatsoever ... (Attachment 2) Anyway I used Curves and Levels on the shadows and Heal Brush for removing the spots... tomvason 10-01-2006, 06:59 AM Thank you Flora, and thank all of you for taking a look at this for me. I'm still rather new to this art and often unsure as to whether or not I've done all I can do with a particular picture. This is what I've done so far, and now I think it's about as far as I will go, given the excellent input I've had here. Thanks again! Tom Daviskw 10-01-2006, 07:37 AM Very GOOD job Tom!!... I do like your attention to detail such as the watch. Perhaps you could hang around and give us a few tips. Butch Kraellin 10-01-2006, 08:52 AM nicely done, flora. i like how you handled the over-shadowing. craig Flora 10-02-2006, 03:47 AM You are welcome Tom! I think you did a great job with this picture!!! :thumbsup: Watch and veil are a bit too sharp and detailed and don't really fit in with the rest of the image ... but it's only my opinion. :happy: Thanks, Craig!! :pleased: |