Steve Conway
03-24-2007, 07:32 AM
OK folks, get ready here's a photo from (you know where.)
Thought I would post it to see what this group can do to help it. I do some retouching, but this one is way beyond me and my retouching software.
It was given to me by a cousin and she knows it is some of our ancestors, but does not have I.D.'s on them.
So if anyone cares to have a go, here is truly a photo restoration nightmare. Probably something only a professional restorer could love.
If you can imagine it, the original was worse than this before I scanned it and did a little contrast and brightness tweaking.
Steve C.
mistermonday
03-24-2007, 09:30 AM
Steve, with "weak" images, often what makes or breaks the retouch is the 1st direction / adjustment (out of many possible) that you make after a raw scan. You may have some better suggestions / results if you post the unadjusted scan.
Regards, Murray
Kraellin
03-24-2007, 10:22 AM
steve,
thanks for posting this. however, this belongs more in the restoration forum, so i'm moving it there.
also, this seems very low resolution and quite pixelated as a result. i'd love to see a higher resolution and without the any adjustments to it; just the raw scan.
it's actually quite do-able as far as what i can see.
Steve Conway
03-24-2007, 12:03 PM
Steve, with "weak" images, often what makes or breaks the retouch is the 1st direction / adjustment (out of many possible) that you make after a raw scan. You may have some better suggestions / results if you post the unadjusted scan.
Regards, Murray
You don't want to even see the unadjusted scan. :spchless:
If I had not done some tweaking of the original, after making it fit the 100k limit, there would not have been a lot to see. Also, this is not a "must have" on my part. If someone feels like fooling with it, fine. If not, no big problem.
I just thought I would post it and those out there that mainly do retouching and restoration might like the challenge.
Thanks for your suggestion.
Steve C.
Steve Conway
03-24-2007, 12:25 PM
steve,
thanks for posting this. however, this belongs more in the restoration forum, so i'm moving it there.
.
This is posted under "Photo Restoration" is it not?
Don't see anything called just "Restoration." Or did I miss something?
Steve C.
Kraellin
03-24-2007, 10:12 PM
well, a tin type is a photo.
but there's no reason we cant do other restorations, like documents or whatever.