| Notices | Welcome to RetouchPRO . You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload images and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. | | Contests A new retouching contest at the start of each month. Prizes for the winners. | 
11-01-2005, 07:47 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: USA
Posts: 2,540
| | | Nov 05 Contest Discussion Add your comments, questions or general discussion about the Nov Contest entries as well as the contest itself here. This is also a great place to share your techniques or ask others about theirs. | 
11-01-2005, 11:31 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: somewhere over there
Posts: 6,492
| | i see you've given us another easy one....not! i'm beginning to believe that most of the challenge/contest moderators around here are sadists  of course, that makes all of us working on it, masochists. a tricky image indeed! shld be fun.
Craig | 
11-02-2005, 06:08 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: USA
Posts: 2,540
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Kraellin i will most likely change this at some point, but if i cant i'll just live with this one.
oh, and you need to include the actual deadline time, T. you've got the voting date, but not the cutoff for entry time.
Craig
edit: replaced my first with this current one. may happen yet again  |
You might want to double check the rules... Quote: |
Originally Posted by T Paul Nov Restoration Challenge: THE RULES:
1. Contest will run from 1 Nov to 23 Nov 2005. Deadline for entries is 6pm EST 23 Nov 2005. |
Last edited by T Paul; 11-02-2005 at 08:32 PM.
| 
11-02-2005, 06:43 PM
|  | Senior Member Patron | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 318
| | Is there a bias here ??
Last edited by Marthig; 11-02-2005 at 06:53 PM.
| 
11-02-2005, 06:53 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: USA
Posts: 2,540
| | | The best way to download the images is by rightclicking (or Cmd/Ctrl clicking) on the link and using "Save Target As". | 
11-02-2005, 07:07 PM
|  | Senior Member Patron | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 318
| | OK I am sorry. First for making a comment at the posting thread and second about the complaint, guess I am too sleepy and wasn't doing it right
Now I downloaded it.
Thank you T Paul !! | 
11-02-2005, 07:17 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: USA
Posts: 2,540
| | You're welcome | 
11-02-2005, 07:28 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: somewhere over there
Posts: 6,492
| | | sorry T. one of these days i'll learn to read.
Craig | 
11-03-2005, 07:46 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: May 2004 Location: Goiânia, Brazil
Posts: 1,546
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Marthig | Hope this isn't against the rules!
Just had to help a bit - Try turning it sideways - See it now?
Rô | 
11-03-2005, 07:48 AM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Lancashire
Posts: 927
| | I am abit confused here, when i downloaded it, it was a picture of a baby, did i download the wrong one? | 
11-03-2005, 07:57 AM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 494
| | That 5mb tif file seems to have a lot of jpg artifacting in it.  Is it meant to be that way?? | 
11-03-2005, 08:15 AM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 138
| | Caitlin - 5MB? I downloaded the 8MB file - there doesn't seem to be any JPEG artifacts (and there shouldn't be, given that its a TIFF file, unless it was resaved from a JPEG  ). But, there is something like a matte texture to the surface that is a part of the actual photo. Just makes it more fun...
- Kurt | 
11-03-2005, 08:17 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: somewhere over there
Posts: 6,492
| | caitlin,
i noticed that too. to me it seemed like the hi-res scan had picked up the paper texture and i went 'oh oh, looks like an FFT job'. so, i worked on the smaller-res scan
Craig | 
11-03-2005, 08:37 AM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 494
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by kschulz Caitlin - 5MB? I downloaded the 8MB file - there doesn't seem to be any JPEG artifacts (and there shouldn't be, given that its a TIFF file, unless it was resaved from a JPEG  ). But, there is something like a matte texture to the surface that is a part of the actual photo. Just makes it more fun...
- Kurt | Sorry - I meant 8mb... I think it must be a jpg resaved as TIF? See attached | 
11-03-2005, 09:15 AM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 270
| | I know it says no whacky backgrounds but I didn't think adding the toys would be since a lot of professional photos have props. Still, if it is where it doesn't qualify, please let me know so I can change it. Although, I'll miss the cute little ducky  LOL
Still if someone could let me know either way that would be great. It's my first time entering in one of these things. |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:59 PM. | |
|