![]() |
| |||||||
| Critiques The place to get serious, in-depth analysis and opinions of your work |
| | Thread Tools |
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| Restoring a tiny print of my grandmother Another one from me! (I can't help myself now... Every photo I see I want to try to restore!) At a family barbaque yesterday a cousin brought out a tiny 5cm square print of my grandmother Dotty, one of only two photos we know of that exist of her. She had had blow up prints made (to 4x6) but they were unsurprisingly very dark and lacking in detail. So I rapidy spirited the print away to do a quick scan, and have been playing around with it today. It's not the original unfortunately (Which we presume no longer exists), and is very dark. Obviously being so small there just isn't all that much detail there to work from. Following a tip from another thread I downloaded Neat Image, and ran a denoising filter which seemed to clear up the noise quite well. I then did a fair bit of unsharp mask, with an extra go at the face area to try to bring out more detail. Also set level and contrast adjustment layers, and curves focusing on reducing the shadow on her face a bit. (I changed the contrast levels as I found that the regular level settings were leaving the image too contrasty) I've made about 5 versions of this now - all with different results, and am getting to the stage that I've forgotten what did and didn't work! So basically if anyone has any tips or thought on better approaches I'd really appreciate it. Last edited by Caitlin; 03-21-2005 at 06:58 AM. |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Honestly it is a wonderful candid and I quite like it the way it is (with your general clean up work) No need to improve on a nice shot |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Neat Image Hi Caitlin. That's a nice picture, and you've done a great job of enhancing it. However, I think you might want to try controlling the effect of neat image a bit. Neat Image is a wonderful tool; I use it quite a bit. However, one thing I find is that it's often too aggressive in removing noise. What I do is create a duplicate layer of my image and run neat image on that. Then, I pull down the layer opacity to between 50-70% to allow some of the grain and subtle gradiations to still show through, while still removing most of the "bad" grain. Cheers, -Darren |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Effects of Post Processing on Print Quality | bestremera | Input/Output/Workflow | 2 | 01-20-2007 04:32 AM |
| Question regarding print sizes | Ken Rogers | Input/Output/Workflow | 4 | 06-20-2005 03:55 PM |
| Problem Getting Quality Prints | T Paul | Hardware | 19 | 03-31-2005 10:38 AM |
| Print Problems. | Jimmy | Hardware | 1 | 10-15-2003 12:29 PM |
| Best Print Resolution? | dandino | Photo-Based Art | 5 | 03-26-2003 02:09 PM |