RetouchPRO

Go Back   RetouchPRO > Technique > Critiques
Register Blogs FAQ Site Nav Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Critiques The place to get serious, in-depth analysis and opinions of your work

Really Bad Photo

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-23-2005, 08:24 AM
Cassidy Cassidy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,104
Really Bad Photo

As background, my eldest with near flawless olive skin conscripted her brother to take photos to fill out her portfolio. With shocking lighting, really high compression and very little skill whatsoever, he managed to photograph her looking blotchy, overblown, overweight, you name it. I had heard that a camera adds 10 pounds and in this case I am pretty sure it did.

Anyway, getting to the point, I thought some of these photos could be worth playing with, so having the time this evening, I started playing and exploring channel changing and the picture I have ended up with looks far more like my eldest. Anyway, I thought I'd try and satin her skin a bit and was quite pleased with the results.

So any comments are welcome as to how this might be improved upon or otherwise
Attached Images
File Type: jpg R15 Satin Skin2 copy.jpg (98.3 KB, 126 views)
Reply With Quote top
  #2  
Old 10-23-2005, 11:08 AM
NancyJ's Avatar
NancyJ NancyJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 729
Looks to me like the version you were working on had too much compression - the skin is smooth (and the background too but the rest of the picture is grainy. The skin work is very nice (as much as its possible to tell on such a small image) but doesnt match the rest of the picture and so looks very obviously retouched.
If you're airbrushing or similar, try to add some noise to match the natural grain of the image.
One other comment I would make is that your daughter appears to have a very fresh natural beauty, but in your retouch she looks to be wearing heavy makeup. In this case I would definately say less is more, especially if this is a modelling portfolio, having naturally beautiful skin is a big plus for a model, this is one of her best assesets, it should be emphasised.
Another thing is the hair, there seems to be massive amounts of smudging on her ends and the levels look very distorted on her roots.
I cant tell on such a small image whether you've straightened her nose or if it was just a bad shadow, if it is the former, I wouldnt recommend it for a modelling portfolio. When retouching portfolio pictures its important not to change the physical appearance of the subject, only remove non-permanent blemishes and things that can be covered with makeup. Its important to give a true representation of the model.
Reply With Quote top
  #3  
Old 10-23-2005, 11:13 AM
Cassidy Cassidy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,104
Most definitely nancyj, the photo is very very compressed, less is more doesn't work too well with this photo given the pixelation. btw, according to my daughter she burned the ends herself, giving quite an unnatural look. With regard to the nose, unfortunately I cant see it

Last edited by Cassidy; 10-23-2005 at 11:31 AM.
Reply With Quote top
  #4  
Old 10-23-2005, 11:46 AM
NancyJ's Avatar
NancyJ NancyJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 729
left: original
middle: my retouch
right: cassidy's retouch

Working on the small images you posted I had a go myself to demonstrate what I was talking about... hope it makes sense.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg prettygirl.jpg (98.1 KB, 91 views)
Reply With Quote top
  #5  
Old 10-23-2005, 11:55 AM
NancyJ's Avatar
NancyJ NancyJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 729
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassidy
Most definitely nancyj, the photo is very very compressed, less is more doesn't work too well with this photo given the pixelation. btw, according to my daughter she burned the ends herself, giving quite an unnatural look. With regard to the nose, unfortunately I cant see it
Not sure what burning her ends is - probably some young trendy thing I dont understand (is that what they call it when they bleach the top and dye the underneath/bottom black?)
What I was talking about is the smudging (see attached)
The nose thing is very slight, on such a small picture its probably 3-5 pixels difference but in the second image her nose is perfectly straight, in the original she appears to have a very slight bump on her bridge, as I said, its very small and could just be the lighting.
Reply With Quote top
  #6  
Old 10-23-2005, 05:49 PM
Cassidy Cassidy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,104
Nancy, thank you very much for your advice, the nose is a lighting anomally, however I think we have missed my original point. This is not a photo that will be added to her portfolio, this was purely an exercise by me to try and attain a satiny skin look. Your retouch definitely looks more natural.

Last edited by Cassidy; 10-23-2005 at 06:32 PM.
Reply With Quote top
  #7  
Old 10-24-2005, 12:48 AM
Craig Walters's Avatar
Craig Walters Craig Walters is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: somewhere over there
Posts: 8,786
Blog Entries: 4
pretty. had a go also.

Craig

edit: hmmm.... decided to add the original touch-up also (the 2nd image here).
Attached Images
File Type: jpg prettygirl-1-k-1.jpg (93.6 KB, 26 views)
File Type: jpg pretty-girl-2-k-1.jpg (94.8 KB, 41 views)
Reply With Quote top
  #8  
Old 10-24-2005, 01:17 AM
NancyJ's Avatar
NancyJ NancyJ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 729
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cassidy
Nancy, thank you very much for your advice, the nose is a lighting anomally, however I think we have missed my original point. This is not a photo that will be added to her portfolio, this was purely an exercise by me to try and attain a satiny skin look. Your retouch definitely looks more natural.
Apologies for the misunderstanding, you did mention in your original post that the photographs were taken to flesh out her portfolio though
Reply With Quote top
Reply

  RetouchPRO > Technique > Critiques


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quality Photo Retouching @ Good Rate radixindia Classifieds 0 10-04-2007 02:16 PM
Oxidation to photo Joramilea Photo Restoration 18 10-25-2006 08:44 PM
Help with a bad photo GerryB Photo Restoration 2 10-10-2006 02:55 PM
Scanning an 18"x13" photo in Edmonton, AB smiley guy Input/Output/Workflow 6 11-05-2005 10:31 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2016 Doug Nelson. All Rights Reserved