| Notices | Welcome to RetouchPRO . You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload images and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. | | Critiques The place to get serious, in-depth analysis and opinions of your work | 
04-12-2006, 09:08 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Thousand Oaks, Ca.
Posts: 192
| | | Ok, I've made some corrections, alterations, etc. I changed the skin tone a bit to make it a little more red. I added some noise and sharpened it a little more and I took the Hollywood out of the teeth and took it out of the eyes a bit. It's frustrating cause it never looks the same when I stick it in jpg to upload to the forum. For instance the noise is more apparent than I wanted it to be or that it appeared in photoshop.
I mentioned this earlier but I am using LAB for this. I think it works extremely well for this. I also use solid color fill adjustment layers to add the color for each area. That also seems to work well. It makes it a lot easier to alter coloring that I have done if I so choose.
Finally, for anyone who is making money on this stuff I was just wondering what people charge for this. What would you charge for this in particular? If you could give me an idea of the average or your own for this and then what you think I could get away with for this stuff. I'm going to hope that I'm good enough for this to be worth more than a six-pack of beer.
Anyways, thanks again in advance and check out my update. | 
04-13-2006, 01:30 AM
|  | Senior Member Patron | | Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 730
| | | I dont like the noise - too heavy and too large. IF you really want to add noise, make it very very light - almost unnoticeable.
I still dont like the skin either - the colour is too heavy, like thick stage makeup all over her body. I'm you take your original and compare it with a desat of this one, I think you will find that your colourisation has affected the luminosity as well as colour (ever so slightly) In your b&w image you have parts of her skin that are very bright - almost white, they should stay that way, otherwise the colour looks 'applied' like makeup.
If you're working in LAB anyway, work on the A & B channels, then you can be sure you are not affecting the L. | 
04-13-2006, 01:46 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: somewhere over there
Posts: 6,570
| | imann,
well, you've added some saturation, color and opacity, but it's now starting to look a bit 'thick' to me, like too much paint on the canvas. it's also a bit too orange-yellow still, at least to me.
on the other hand, with this being your first colorizing project, i think you've done a remarkable job so far!
skin tones are tricky. it's an area i have problems with also. and as someone else pointed out, skin tones over black and white can also be tricky. to me it's quite acceptable. this is what i meant by it having a '50's look' to it. that was actually a style back then. and since this is an older picture, i find that quite acceptable.
i warn you also, anything you post in the 'critique' forum is going to be scrutinized to death and there is always a risk of overwhelming someone with all the 'faults' one can find in any image. 'perfection' is an absolute and i'm here to tell you, there are NO absolutes in this universe; none! so, at some point, just thank everyone for their help and make your own decision that this is done. for the most part you've got it. your mother would love it, i'm sure. we're nitpickers that nitpick over nitpicking here  dont compromise your own reality over what is right or what is done, but at the same time, dont fall into the trap that 'everyone else knows best and i must listen to them all'. that will kill you for sure
craig | 
04-13-2006, 09:46 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Thousand Oaks, Ca.
Posts: 192
| | | Craig: I'm sorry to report that Isaac has since passed away. They said it was due to trying to stick everyone's opinion into his picture at the same time.
I actually agree with you on the idea of that 50's look as long as it isn't too harsh. I want it to be somewhat realistic as well. I am totally guilty of thinking that everyone else knows best though. I tend to not take me own gut feeling on these matters at all. Mostly it's cause I am just starting out on this stuff and don't think I know anything. I do like to come to the critique section though, cause I do like to have myself ripped to shreads sometimes. To me that is how you learn as long as the people who rip tell you the better way to do it and the people here do.
It pleases me a great deal to hear your compliments though. I think I am doing much better with this than I thought I was capable of so that is pleasing in and of itself.
I do have a great deal of trouble with this skin tone stuff. It's very hard to foresee what you are going to get when you print it out and what I have on photoshop always looks better to me there than it does in the jpeg I send you guys. I often can't see the yellow tint in something until it's sitting next to something that is done better. Someone here did that earlier. Oh, well that's what experience provides I guess.
I'll be posting one more in a bit if you want to come and take a look. I am totally in agreement with the overpainted look but am having a hell of a time removing it. Any detailed suggestions?
NancyJ: I didn't really understand your suggestion. Can you explain it? I don't know what you mean by just working in the b channel. Is it as simple as highlighting that channel, keeping everything else visible and working on it like that? What else does it involve? Or is it something completely different? Sometimes I miss the obvious. I tend to make things too confusing at times. | 
04-13-2006, 10:32 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: somewhere over there
Posts: 6,570
| | well, say a kind word at his funeral for me
i took your image and adjusted it. the process was pretty simple. you're very close. i used psp 10's adjustment layer, 'color balance'. this divides the image into ranges, lows, mids, highs and channels, r, g, b. thus, you can adjust the low r, g, b's and so on across the boards.
what you want to remember, regardless of what you use is, blue counters yellow. so, what i did in color balance was to raise the reds a bit in each range, and raise the blues a bit in each range.
as a final step, i added a hue/sat/lightness adjustment layer and lowered the saturation to -15.
and that was it.
so, you can see, you arent far off. mine isnt perfect either, but i like it
and yes, posting with this 100k limit can mess things a bit, but it's usually not enough to at least tell what's going on.
craig | 
04-13-2006, 11:59 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Thousand Oaks, Ca.
Posts: 192
| | | I have got a fairly good base with color but that is it. So in other words I know what the opposites are of each of the main colors. I use this alot. I know to reduce a color to get more of its opposite. The one thing that you mentioned is the use of the hue/sat adjustment. I never thought about using that. Stupid, I know but there are so many damn things you can use to accomplish the same thing that sometimes you just forget about one or another. The only thing that I think is wrong with yours and is the case obviously with mine is it's too red I think. I used the opacity on this version and I think I was able to cut down both the reds and yellows well. Let me know if you think it is still looking to made up. I did reduce the noise significantly as well. Anyhoo, here it is. | 
04-14-2006, 12:51 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: somewhere over there
Posts: 6,570
| | ok, that looks better. just one thing (there's always just 'one more thing', isnt there  ), when you paint, particularly with airbrush, always do it on a separate layer and when done, always check it over and erase the bits where you've painted 'outside the lines'. her glasses, in this case, seem to have been painted with the skin tone colors, but not erased.
hue/sat, channel mixer, or color balance would all have worked (not sure how many of those correspond in PS).
craig | 
04-14-2006, 01:47 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Thousand Oaks, Ca.
Posts: 192
| | | Craig,
All the color layers are done in separate layers. I used color adjustment layers so I could change the colors as well if I wanted. With the glasses, that was done on purpose. The color is actually different than the skin a little bit. Those glasses are clear and the color from her skin would show through the glasses. That's why it is in the glasses but a bit lighter. I think that is what you are talking about. Could you clarify if it isn't?
Isaac | 
04-16-2006, 09:37 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: somewhere over there
Posts: 6,570
| | Quote: |
With the glasses, that was done on purpose. The color is actually different than the skin a little bit. Those glasses are clear and the color from her skin would show through the glasses.
| ah, ok. in that case, good catch
craig | 
04-19-2006, 12:02 PM
|  | Member | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Maysville, MO
Posts: 64
| | | her teeth look a bit grey to me :P
i still aint sure about the left eyebrow....looks like it might need a bit more color.
hope ur havin fun imann. |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:09 PM. | |
|