RetouchPRO

Go Back   RetouchPRO > Technique > Critiques
Register Blogs FAQ Site Nav Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Critiques The place to get serious, in-depth analysis and opinions of your work

Black & White

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-27-2006, 02:57 AM
imann08 imann08 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Thousand Oaks, Ca.
Posts: 192
Black & White

To do this I used Neat Image, Surface Blur, and Blur Tool to get rid of the noise and other stuff. I used the Channel Mixer to get to b&w and Curves to enhance the tonal range. With overlay gray layers I darkened the floor and bench. Finally, I used both conventional and hiraloam sharpening methods to finish it off.

When doing this I usually worry that I have gone overboard with one thing or the other, be it blurring or shapening or contrast enhancement. Generally, I think this came out alright.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Original.jpg (98.0 KB, 73 views)
File Type: jpg Restored.jpg (97.7 KB, 93 views)
Reply With Quote top
  #2  
Old 07-27-2006, 08:41 AM
Vikki Vikki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 883
I would say the image is too smooth and looks manipulated. The contrast is also too strong (you have lost detail in the shadows).
If you lay this on a layer, over your original, and let some of the original image show through, I think it would look just right.
Reply With Quote top
  #3  
Old 07-27-2006, 01:24 PM
Craig Walters's Avatar
Craig Walters Craig Walters is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: somewhere over there
Posts: 8,786
Blog Entries: 4
isaac,

i'm a little curious as to why you're posting this again in a new thread. why not use the old thread where this originated and keep the continuity of the work. i see others do this once in a while and it always puzzles and even confuses me a bit.

i think vikki has this pretty much right here. where you've cleaned things up VERY nicely, you may have gone overboard just a touch, particularly on the contrast. i'll only add that, that may not be all bad if you're planning to print. prints tend to lose a bit of resolution, even with the better printers we have today. so, that stark contrast may actually bleed down a bit in a printing and be ok that way. would be interesting to see.

craig
Reply With Quote top
  #4  
Old 07-27-2006, 02:30 PM
imann08 imann08 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Thousand Oaks, Ca.
Posts: 192
Thanks for the comment. You are both mentioning areas where I am always unsure about but are also very subjective.

Regarding the smoothness of the image, it was really messed up in the original and in order to get that stuff out I didn't see many options open to me other than making it a bit too smooth. It was one or the other and I made a choice.

I am sorry if I posted this before on another thread. I would have removed that if I had remembered. This correction is completely different than the previous one at least in terms of the methods used. I took some time out to practice a bit and then tried it again.

I will be printing this eventually.

I tend to error to the side of too contrasty in general. I try to come up with what I think is good and then decrease it a bit although I didn't do that here. That should just be a rule for me. I do have a full tonal range and I did not blow-out any whites or plug up any blacks.
Reply With Quote top
  #5  
Old 07-27-2006, 08:09 PM
recrisp recrisp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 53
First, I do have to say that you actually did a very good job on this, and really, how it looks it so subjective, it's hard to please us all, and if you're happy with it, and if you're doing it for someone else, and they're happy, well, that's what matters.

You can take the image and duplicate it, then do the following, and it will help it some.

Anyway, on this particular image, add 1.11 noise using the gaussian selection... That will introduce noise to get rid of the 'too smooth' look.

Then, use gaussian blur at a setting of 0.1 to soften the noise.

Change the Layer to Lighten...

Change the Layer's opacity to 70%, this will lessen the effect, but it will still make it look 'more photographic', and not so touched up.

I know that some will think this may sound crazy, but we generally think of photos as having 'some' noise in them, so if it looks too perfect and you want it 'not so perfect', this will make it look more accepting to us.

It's just a thought, and you can salt and pepper to taste, 'specially if you are working on another size.

Randy
Reply With Quote top
  #6  
Old 07-27-2006, 08:19 PM
duwayne duwayne is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Westerville Ohio
Posts: 292
I took a quick shot. Ran the original through NeatImage to reduce the paper texture and noise. I think I used "reduce 1/2 the noise". You need some to keep the image from looking very "flat".
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Original01_filtered.jpg (67.4 KB, 38 views)
Reply With Quote top
  #7  
Old 07-27-2006, 11:07 PM
imann08 imann08 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Thousand Oaks, Ca.
Posts: 192
Recrisp. I like that idea and I'll give it a go and see where it gets me.

Duwayne, that is leaving way too much noise behind for my tastes. I can't say which is the preferred way but for me, if I'm going to err, I'm going to do it on the smooth side.
Reply With Quote top
  #8  
Old 07-28-2006, 01:42 AM
imann08 imann08 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Thousand Oaks, Ca.
Posts: 192
I printed the picture out and could really see that it was too contrasty once it got down on ink. I used the tip to add noise given by recrisp although I had to use higher numbers for it to be visible to me. I also blended a duplicate layer in screen mode at 40% and it looked much better down on ink. I wish I could get more definition out of the hair of the mother and son but I just don't think that is possible without drawing it in and I don't want to be doing that. Anyways, here's what I came up with.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg LightenedwithNoise.jpg (98.1 KB, 28 views)
Reply With Quote top
  #9  
Old 07-28-2006, 09:18 AM
Vikki Vikki is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Arizona
Posts: 883
All of the things you are trying now (adding noise, screen mode) really aren't the best way to go. Your original has the detail and noise/grain you need. The problem is that the techniques you've used to smooth out the image and increase the contrast are just too strong, and you've applied them over the entire image. You have lost detail that cannot be brought back unless you work from the original. Below is crop of yours next to the original (adjusted). Notice that there is hardly any detail remaining in your version compared to the original.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg shoes.jpg (41.5 KB, 34 views)
Reply With Quote top
  #10  
Old 07-28-2006, 12:02 PM
recrisp recrisp is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 53
I agree with Vikki actually, and I only said what I said because I was assuming that you liked the one that you did. I assumed that 'what you want', is maybe 'not what we might want to see', so I tried to make your corrected one work a little better, but normally I would've started out a different way, and not so much contrast in it, or smoothing.

I took the original image and played around with it early this morning to see what was there as far as shadow and highlight detail, and I saw more than what you ended up with. (I didn't save it, now I wish I did) Personally, I thought it looked better not so contrasty, but yours has it's own charm too, it's all in how you preceive it, and like I said earlier, do what you like if you can get away with it.

One thing too, the lady's dress, and the kid's shorts are splotchy, I don't think this was in their clothes when the photograph was taken, so that would need to be removed by cloning, painting, etc.

You may want to take the original image into Shadow/Highlight to get the detail you want, like Vikki mentioned, there is considerably more in the highlights, and 'some' in the darks areas too. You may be tired of fixing this particular one, and if so, maybe on the next one you can try all of this information given by everyone. I really think you're doing good though, but just slightly too much, and that over-processed look just makes it look a little too 'retouched', but the clean-up etc., that looks pretty good to me.

Randy
Reply With Quote top
Reply

  RetouchPRO > Technique > Critiques


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tutorial 05: Converting a Color Image to Black and White grayscale BW DannyRaphael Photo-Art 101 17 05-22-2011 05:55 PM
Layer Tutorials..again? zip022 RP Tutorials 21 11-18-2004 11:10 PM
new custom ICC profiles black and white, color christophe Input/Output/Workflow 5 05-26-2004 09:26 PM
Actions: Black and white B&W BW (Bill Miller) Bill M Photo-Based Art 13 05-18-2003 02:21 PM
Black and White Target Values in PSP? tjsgarden Photo Restoration 6 04-29-2002 09:03 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2016 Doug Nelson. All Rights Reserved