![]() |
| |||||||
| Critiques The place to get serious, in-depth analysis and opinions of your work |
| | Thread Tools |
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| Which is better? I am trying some different things with photoshop, I am trying to find ways to liven up photographs without too many steps. I have been using Photoshop for 5 years, and Usually I go way too far. I am trying to scale back a bit. Which retouch is the best, which is the worst, and why? Are they all too much? The first is the original... #1 has an overlay layer #2 has a high contrast layer set to luminosity #3 has a layer darkened , blurred, and set to luminosity Last edited by i-inspire; 01-31-2008 at 10:48 PM. Reason: left something out |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Which is better? I like the Original better... just needs slight sharpening! That wouldn't be to many steps |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Which is better? Yep number Ø is better, the original. Could be improved with a slight S curve. Worst is number 3 where you have blurred |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Which is better? Thank you for your honest input. (I thought I was overdoing it... now I know I was) |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Re: Which is better? I think the original was the best of all the photos. I did a quick adjustment on them using the green channel on its own layer set to luminosity at 100 percent opacity, then the red channel on a layer on top of that set to luminosity at 56 percent opacity, then a very slight curves layer to liking... |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Re: Which is better? I am new here but anxious to post and learn. I liked the 2nd one better. the others looked a little pale to me. I am using photoshop5 (old, but....) and did a level nd color evening to get this retouch. I'll have to check the FAQs to see how to post pics here. http://home.comcast.net/~warlockpw/g...ed.colored.jpg |
| Thread Tools | |
| |