RetouchPRO

Go Back   RetouchPRO > Technique > Critiques

Notices

Critiques The place to get serious, in-depth analysis and opinions of your work

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 09-12-2003, 10:35 AM
Noko's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 31
First showing

Hi Everybody
Just want to say this forum/site is great. I’ve been doing Photo Restoration off and on for about 8 years, more off than on. Been using Photoshop since version 2.5 mainly for fun, doing graphics and photography enhancements.

I was doing Photo Restoration as a side business. I made enough money from it to keep me up to date in computer and photography equipment. I stopped doing restoration when Photoshop 5 came out with the new color management and I could figure out how to match what I saw on my screen and what printed out. Well now it seems that some years later, everybody has got their icc profiles straight and I can print what I see on my screen, I decided to get back into Photo Restoration.

I’m so glad I found this site, it has already helped me with scanning textured photos (one of my biggest headaches) I found the tutorial here on this site. I was scanning the photo one way and then turning it 180 degrees and scanning it again. Once in Photoshop sandwiching together and turning the opacity down on the top one. That work ok at best but then I read the tut and all I had to do was change the layer blending mode to darken. I tell you I was so happy to find that out.

Anyway I I’m currently redoing my website and trying to add new updated restoration pics. This is the latest one that I have done. It has a little of everything in it. Let me know what you guys think.


Wedding
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-12-2003, 05:26 PM
Ed_L's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: northwest Indiana, about 45 minutes from Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,821
Hi Noko,

Welcome to RP. I think you've done an excellent job on the image. You got rid of the distracting elements, and put the focus on the couple. Good job on the color also. At first glance I thought you might have lost some of the detail in the clothing in the darker areas, but on a closer look, I can see you didn't. Excellent work!

Ed
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-13-2003, 12:12 AM
roger_ele's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 585
Hi Noko,

Very well done! Only in the spirit of searching for any possible tweaks ...

-Might be a little contrasty, the blacks and whites don't have the detail I would expect in the scene naturally (as originally photographed)

-Faces are very well done, but a little feeling of detail has been lost.

-The bluish haze from (I am assuming) daylight through a doorway that is reflecting off of the paneling could be removed with Clone (color blending mode) or painting on a new layer set to color blending mode.

Excellent work,
Roger
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-13-2003, 04:09 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Antwerp Belgium
Posts: 133
Noko,


As I am in no way in your league accomplishing the result you got on this photo please forgive me for pointing this out.
But I wanted to ask why you put all the distracting things as the microphone out of the way but left the white roll lying on the ground? Is it something that has to be there for these two people or was it too difficult to leave it out?
The positive things I can't begin to name so I'm sorry for the critique but for one I very much like how you got the sheen and detail in the dress.


gina
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-14-2003, 06:35 PM
Noko's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 31
Thank you for your comments everybody. I thought there was a blue color cast on that back wall but got so distracted with the many other corrections that I forgot about that. I didn’t know if I should leave the white runner on the floor or not. It not to hard to take out, actually it would be easy to take out compared to that microphone lol. Your right though I think I will take that out. As far as the contrast goes I agree that there’s too much of it. I didn’t scan this image plus I don’t know what the actual image really looks like. I tried to lower the contrast before and the whites in the dress looked muddy. I’m going to play with all these suggestions. I want this photo to go into my portfolio.

Gina don’t be sorry for the critique. I’m thick skinned and love to hear the good and bad about my work. If everybody just said "Oh that’s Great" I would never get better.

As far as the dress goes, I had two levels adjustment layers. One for the over all image and one just for the dress with a layer mask blocking everything else from being corrected.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-15-2003, 12:48 AM
Conk's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Vancouver B.C.
Posts: 53
Noko
Fantastic restore. I noticed the grooms foot having been redone. Great eye to catch that and to make it better.
It's said that there was lost detail in the faces. I'm not sure there was any detail to be lost but I think trying to achive a little more wouldn't hurt. Maybe a soft focus is better suited to the feel of the photo.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Showing off my work. TheBird Your Website 3 05-21-2007 12:49 AM
Gary - anybody - help please? 1STLITE Hardware 78 02-25-2007 03:08 AM
Showing Process of photo restoring/ Need Input ArkNsawer Photo Restoration 6 11-28-2006 10:43 PM
Forum Images Not Showing rnbluvva Website Feedback 3 04-11-2004 02:56 PM
My links are not showing up jeaniesa Website Feedback 2 06-03-2002 09:54 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2008 Doug Nelson. All Rights Reserved




1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51