RetouchPRO

Go Back   RetouchPRO > Tools > Hardware
Register Blogs FAQ Site Nav Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Hardware Computers, displays, tablets, scanners, cameras, printers, etc.

Disk partitioning - to do or not to do?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 12-08-2001, 12:29 AM
jeaniesa's Avatar
jeaniesa jeaniesa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Colorado foothills
Posts: 1,826
Disk partitioning - to do or not to do?

I've had a new 60G hard drive sitting in my office for about a month now. I bought it before I realized I needed a new BIOS that would support a disk that size, so had to wait for the BIOS chip to arrive - which it did the day before I left for the Thanksgiving holiday and there was no way I was going to try to fool around with it in that short amount of time. Of course, returning from vacation, I had a few projects that I had to accomplish before I could get back to fooling around with my computer.

I got the new hard drive because I keep filling up my current disk at an alarming rate and then get the "disk full" message in Photoshop (because the temp file has grown so large) and there's no way for me to save me work. Ugh.

I finally installed the new BIOS chip and got everything working earlier this week. Since then, I've been trying to figure out if I need/should/want to partition the new disk. At first I thought I'd just add it as one big second disk to store all of my photo projects on (as well as use it for the Photoshop scratch file), leaving my current disk (13G) as the system disk. But then I got to thinking that I should use the new disk as my system disk because it's faster (and therefore the swap file access should be faster, right?)

So, I thought that perhaps I'd make 2 partitions on the new disk: one with all of the system/program files and the second for all of my user files. In that case, I could use my current disk as a backup for the system partition in case the unthinkable happens. But if I do that, then what size do I make the system partition? I know it includes the swap file, but I want to leave enough room to add other applications - I just don't know how many that might be in the future. If I don't fill it up, then it's "wasted" space, but if I do fill it up, then I'm pretty much hosed. Right? And Tim's comment about having to live with my partitions for a "long, long time" has me rethinking my current strategy.

I guess I'd like to hear other's experiences as to whether they've partitioned or not - and why. Plus, any other advice would be most helpful. My current file management scheme is through directories and has worked fine for me over the years. I can usually find a file I'm looking for pretty easily. So partitioning as a way to manage my files isn't particularly attractive to me. However, partitioning to make backups easier/simpler or to reduce disk fragmentation are positives in my mind (if in fact partitioning really helps with these things.)

Thanks, Jeanie
Reply With Quote top
  #2  
Old 12-08-2001, 01:03 AM
Doug Nelson's Avatar
Doug Nelson Doug Nelson is offline
Janitor
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,068
Blog Entries: 21
Partitioning isn't nearly as important as it used to be. There used to be several performance arguments, but most of those have been eliminated by technology.

Personally, unless you need different file systems (ie: on a multiboot system) or you have an application which would work better with it's own drive letter, I wouldn't worry about partitioning.

You definitely want your swap files on the faster disk, but then you would want all your most-frequently accessed files on the faster disk. Unfortunately, many of these files (ie: the OS) must reside on your bootable disk (ie: c: drive).

An option is to make the new drive the c: drive, put applications and swap files on it, and make the slower disk the documents drive.

The order of the drives at boot and is the only decision that can't be changed easily at a later time. Nowadays you can even re-partition without risking data.

Note: swapping out your main hd isn't just a case of trading cables. There are also 'master' and 'slave' settings on the individual drives.
Reply With Quote top
  #3  
Old 12-08-2001, 01:39 AM
jeaniesa's Avatar
jeaniesa jeaniesa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Colorado foothills
Posts: 1,826
Thanks for the info Doug. I figured out that partitioning for better performance was pretty much a thing of the past. What I forgot to mention in my initial post is that I'm also trying to think ahead to when I might want to upgrade to Windows XP. I'm still at Win98. I was thinking that maybe having the "old drive" still bootable with Win98 might make the transition a little easier. I don't really want to make it the main documents drive as it's a quarter of the size of my new disk and that seems to defeat the purpose of getting the larger disk in the first place.

I do know about the need to set master/slave on the drives. What do you mean by "order of the drives" not being easily switched at a later time? Do you mean the physical drives or the logical partitions?

Thanks, Jeanie
Reply With Quote top
  #4  
Old 12-08-2001, 02:23 AM
Doug Nelson's Avatar
Doug Nelson Doug Nelson is offline
Janitor
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,068
Blog Entries: 21
I mean which one is c: and which one is d:, since that's a hardware setting.

I'll bet the Mac users are feeling so smug right about now
Reply With Quote top
  #5  
Old 01-03-2002, 03:30 PM
photophil's Avatar
photophil photophil is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Central Wisconsin
Posts: 26
I would leave it as one big hard drive under win98se. I really wouldn't consider upgrading to winxp until the second edition comes out for it is quite buggy and unsecure. Win98 is still by far the best OS even over ME which has a great deal of memory management problems
Reply With Quote top
  #6  
Old 01-03-2002, 04:30 PM
chris h's Avatar
chris h chris h is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Northern UK
Posts: 991
I use 98 and XP on a dual boot system. I haven't had any problems with XP although I've tossed a couple of patches at it. I never tried ME and from what I've heard haven't missed much.
Reply With Quote top
  #7  
Old 01-10-2002, 03:26 PM
Fosnocht's Avatar
Fosnocht Fosnocht is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 8
hard drive

The one thing to remember....

The IDE bus is going to use the master drive to regulate speed.
In other words, the speed of the access defaults to the lowest speed connected to the IDE cable. If your "old drive is an ATA 66 then the max throughput will be at 66MB/sec even if your new drive is an ATA 100 (which most of the new 60GB HDD are). A safer way of doing things would be to put the new drive as the boot drive, and put the old drive on the 2nd IDE cable as master with a CDROM as the slave. This way you will get the max performance from the higher speed new drive....
I think I got that right....someone let me know if I didn't....

Love this forum....relatively new to this

Brian
Reply With Quote top
Reply

  RetouchPRO > Tools > Hardware


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Photoshop home edition Forgiven4ever Photoshop Help 1 10-29-2004 08:26 PM
Advice on computers - what do I need Elya Hardware 6 09-01-2003 10:18 AM
Getting pictures on a floppy disk.. Needing your Help!! Donamai Input/Output/Workflow 8 01-13-2003 09:48 AM
Getting pictures on a floppy disk, needing your help! Donamai Photo-Based Art 2 12-24-2002 11:15 AM
Hard drive partitioning? jeaniesa Hardware 9 11-18-2002 12:42 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2016 Doug Nelson. All Rights Reserved