2nd Hard Drive
I don't have a 2nd hd on any machine w/PS installed, but I've heard the idea is to separate the PS scratch disk from the Windows swap disk. I have, however, had very bad luck in the past putting Windows' swap disk on a non-boot drive. I can't recommend that. So basically, I'd put your OS, programs and swapfile on your boot drive and PS's scratch disk and "My Documents" on the 2nd drive.
There can be a few things to consider -
As mentioned, the Windows and Photoshop primary scratch disks are best separated to dedicated drives.
The faster the drives read/write and access speeds the better.
Photoshop Scratch is a band aid - ideally you will have enough true RAM (3-5 times the largest common file you work on). So if the primary purpose is to make Photoshop scream then the investment is better spent in RAM or processors.
If scratch does get used, ideally a separate dedicated empty drive which is defragged on a regular basis is best as the primary scratch. A second or other extra physical drives are then added so that the user can store more files or assign more scratch disks. A relativly small (say 5 gig) but very fast drive which costs little money may be a good solution as the dedicated primary scratch - then a larger but perhaps slower drive can be used as the main extra drive.
I am not sure if software partions of a single physcial drive is slower than a single large partition, I have never seen any documentation or benchmarks on this.
RAID hard drive systems used to be the ultimate - today FireWire RAID is probably a fast, safe option for high performance users.
Doug and Stephen thanks for the information.
Stephen, I was under the impression that a 2nd hard drive for PS was essential. But if additional Ram will make PS scream, than additional RAM is what I need.
I have Windows XP Prof., Pentium 4, 1.7 Ghz Processor, and 512 MB of RAM. If I double the RAM, would this stop PS7 from slowing down after a few hours of working on large files (files the size of our challenges)?
What is the definition of "scream"? My setup is about the same as Sharon's (but XP Home edition), and I *think* Photoshop runs pretty good. By that I mean I don't see any really bad slow downs, except when using *some* filters on a large file. I only have one hard drive in the computer, and I sometimes get a warning that the Windows swap disk is on the same drive as Photoshop's scratch disk. Can someone explain why it's not a good idea to have it set up that way?
RE: "What's your definition of 'scream'?"
Great question. Screaming for some is dreadfully slow for others. It's definitely relative to what you're used to.
RE: Why split Swap and Scratch?
Keeping Swap and Scratch on separate hard disks is a rule of thumb, but not a hard, fast law.
It's not uncommon for data to be exchanged back-and-forth between the Windows Swap File and PS's scratch disk. When that happens there are literally thousands of "read / write" operations that take place during the data transfer... as data is read from one area and written to another area.
Generally speaking it is more efficient (computer-wise) to move data from one hard drive to a different one vs. moving it within a single disk).
When both files are on the same hard drive, there is more delay between each READ and subsequent WRITE.
1. C:\ Read from Windows Swap
7. C:\ WRITE PS scratch
13. C:\ Read from Windows Swap
19. C:\ WRITE PS scratch
When files are on different hard drives and assuming each drive is more-or-less the same speed, the delay is less between each READ and the WRITE operation.
1. C:\ Read from Windows Swap
3. D:\ WRITE PS scratch
5. C:\ from Windows Swap
7. D:\ WRITE PS scratch
For some files and some operations, one would barely notice the difference. For others situations the later configuration may save considerable seconds between operations.
Things like image size, disk throughput capabilities, how fragmented the disks are, how much RAM is in your machine, what else is running at the moment, what OS you're running, how many images are open concurrently within PS, etc. can have effect on throughput.
Does this help?
If PS7 is bogging down with 512MB of RAM on a P4/1.7 under XP/PRO, I'd bet that adding another 512MB will buy you a moderate amount of throughput relief, but I wouldn't bet on "scream" (unless you're working on 100KB images or the like).
To not make matters worse get a 2nd drive "as fast as" your primary internal hard drive if you decide to go that route.
A 2nd drive is also a good idea; it would provide a location for a backu copy of "My Documents." (Put "current" My Documents on the new drive; keep a backup on the original.)
Clear as a bell Danny. Thanks for taking the time to explain it.
I'm stuck with one HD at the moment but I had it partitioned into two sections when I got the computer. One partition (D: ) is left blank for Photoshop and this setup seems to work well for me. I have a 1ghz Athlon with 512ram and I regularly work with 100 - 200 mb files without much slow down....maybe it does not "scream" but it gets the job done!
Thanks for the detailed information.
If I were to get a 2nd hard drive, would I just drag and drop the Scratch Disk and My Documents to it?
My present hard drive is IBM 60GB 7200 Ultra IDE. So if my 2nd hard drive is the same brand and speed but only 5GB, then my computer shouldn’t slow down on large files. Right?
Photoshop scratch disk location is specified in one of the Preferences dialog boxes. Look for the "Scratch Disk" choice. When you get there you'll see the dropdowns to specify placement.
Probably says "C\:" now... change to [whatever address your new external HD is]. It will be in the dropdown list. You'll need to exit/restart PS for this to take effect.
RE: My Documents...
Since your external HD capacity is 5 GB, moving the entire contents of My Documents there might chew up so much room there won't be enough space for the PS scratch file.... Just depends on the size of the My Documents folder.
If you right-click on the My Documents icon and choose Properties, somewhere in the dialog box (it's different with each flavor of Windows it seems) it should tell (or you can calculate) the size of My Documents.
If My Documents is real big (like mine is - 40 GB), copying selected folders from My Documents as backups to new HD might be the best you can do.
RE: "...then my computer shouldn’t slow down on large files. Right?
Time will tell. It could improve throughput. You'll just have to try it.
My fingers be crossed for you!
|Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Hard Drive Recommendations||T Paul||Hardware||10||12-11-2006 06:08 PM|
|Source or advice for hard drive "cage"?||Lucile Davis||Hardware||1||08-21-2006 06:40 PM|
|External hard drive for PS/CS||martyphoto||Hardware||3||10-20-2005 09:17 PM|
|Moving Elements 3.0 Catalog to new hard drive||jimvet||Photoshop Elements Help||3||06-20-2005 11:15 AM|
|highest capacity storage device?||tws||Hardware||10||01-02-2005 12:12 PM|