| Notices | Welcome to RetouchPRO . You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload images and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. | | Hardware Computers, displays, tablets, scanners, cameras, printers, etc. | 
09-08-2002, 12:31 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: northwest Indiana, about 45 minutes from Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,821
| | | Hard drive question Not knowing much at all about computers, I have a question about hard drives. I'm considering buying a second hard drive, and I have 512 MB DDR Ram installed in my Dell computer. The Ram is listed as PC 2100. I've seen hard drives advertised as 5400 rpm and PC 133. There is another advertised as 7200 rpm and PC 100. I'm thinking that the faster the rpm, the faster the hard drive, but I'm also thinking that the PC 100 is capable of transferring 100 MB per second, and the PC 133 goes at 133 MB per second. Is that right??? If so, and I had to choose one or the other of the ones mentioned, which one would I be better off with? Would there be a noticeable difference? More questions to follow.
Ed | 
09-08-2002, 12:39 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: South Africa
Posts: 497
| | | Ed, you definitely want to go for the rpms. The other numbers refer to the bus speed, and it doesn't matter how fast the bus speed is, the CPU will always have to wait for the hard drive to find the data. The faster the drive spins, the faster it can pass the data to the bus.
Remember, the hard disk is a mechanical device.
Luck... | 
09-08-2002, 12:40 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Northern UK
Posts: 991
| | | In speed terms about the blink of an eye Ed. I do usually get the faster option but I'm probably wasting my money which is better spent on Ram. | 
09-08-2002, 01:06 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 951
| | | I have never heard hard drive bus speed referred to as "PC 100"...am I just out of touch? I always heard "Mode 5, Ultra ATA" etc... as referring to transfer speed. Do these two terms refer to the same thing? | 
09-08-2002, 02:34 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Texas
Posts: 244
| | | I think we're talking apples and oranges here.
Ultra ATA-133 refers to the maximum hard disk data transfer rate of 133 Mbytes/sec. Look for the seek times in the spec. sheet. The lower the seek time the faster the hard drive.
PC-2100 refers to the ram theoretical transfer rate. | 
09-08-2002, 03:09 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: northwest Indiana, about 45 minutes from Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,821
| | Thanks for the replies folks. Now I know what to look for. Greg, I told you I knew little about computers  . It was probably ATA 100, and ATA 133. (okay, what does "ATA" stand for?) Sorry for the mixup.
Ed | 
09-08-2002, 03:16 PM
|  | Member | | Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: California
Posts: 66
| | | Two generalizations about hard drive speed (ie there are exceptions):
RPMs are directly proportional to noise. Slower drives are quieter.
RPMs are inversely proportional to reliability. Faster drives are much harder to keep cool, which means they have more early deaths.
I've used 10,000 rpm SCSI drives on my lab systems and found that they are noisy, and get very hot, even in a seperate case with extra fans. The new 15,000 rpm drives seem to be more of the same.
My own preference is for IBM 5400 rpm drives for the majority of my storage, since they run quiet and cool. If I had a bit more money, though I'd have one of the 15,000 rpm drives for a scratch disk...
--tks | 
09-08-2002, 03:26 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Texas
Posts: 244
| | | Advanced Technology Attachment (ATA)
Also known as Ultra DMA, ATA is generally the least expensive hard drive interface; many computer motherboards include ATA controllers and cable connectors that typically control the "C" drive that contains the operating system. | 
09-08-2002, 04:12 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: northwest Indiana, about 45 minutes from Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,821
| | Wow! Knowing something like that almost makes me a nerd!  Thanks for the reply.
Ed | 
09-08-2002, 04:50 PM
|  | Moderator Patron | | Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Near Seattle, Washington, USA
Posts: 5,626
| | | What do you hope to gain or do better or what problem(s) are you trying to solve?
The answers will affect shopping options. | 
09-08-2002, 07:07 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: northwest Indiana, about 45 minutes from Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,821
| | | At present time, I have a computer with a 40 gig hard drive (my main 'puter). I also have another with a 5 gig, and a 20 gig hard drive. I am now using my 20 gig drive (5400 rpm) for storage of images, etc. I would like to get another hard drive for my main computer to use for image storage and scratch disk (unless there's a problem with this), then use the 20 gig for backup.
Ed | 
09-08-2002, 08:08 PM
|  | Janitor | | Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,920
| | | One of the things I've found to make a huge difference from one drive to another is the amount of cache ram onboard. I think it's Maxtor that currently has a 7200rpm drive with 8meg of onboard ram. It has the suffix "jr" which stands for Jumbo Ram.
It's recently bumped IBM off the lists of at least two magazines editor's choice lists, due to ongoing problems with IBM reliability. | 
09-08-2002, 08:22 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: northwest Indiana, about 45 minutes from Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,821
| | | Ah, and I thought I knew what I needed to know! Thanks for the tip.
Ed | 
09-09-2002, 05:09 AM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Texas
Posts: 244
| | | Doug, I believe that IBM has sold its storage division. So much for reliability. Too bad because for years IBM had the best hard drives out there. | 
09-09-2002, 05:26 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Northern UK
Posts: 991
| | | I've moved into the Maxtor camp after a new IBM drive faded away on me. |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:08 AM. | |
|