RetouchPRO

Go Back   RetouchPRO > Tools > Hardware

Notices

Hardware Computers, displays, tablets, scanners, cameras, printers, etc.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 10-14-2002, 06:19 PM
chris h's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Northern UK
Posts: 991
2450 Demise ?

Looks like the Epson 2450 has had its day.

http://www.normankoren.com/Tutorials..._flatbeds.html
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-14-2002, 07:06 PM
G. Couch's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 951
Confusing...wonder why they don't just release a higher dpi model of the 2450 rather than a new model with just 35mm capability?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-14-2002, 07:20 PM
Doug Nelson's Avatar
Janitor
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 3,908
Blog Entries: 20
The news might not be all bad. When the Expression 800 was discontinued you could buy new ones for $150 (down from $900).
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-19-2002, 04:15 PM
KevinBE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 511
Just my luck, I bought a 2450 2 months ago. I guess I can't complain, that's just the way it is in the world of consumer electronics. Everything gets better and cheaper all at the same time.

I just started scanning 35mm negatives today fo the first time with this scanner. I sat down with a small box full of negatives, loaded up the negative frame and got a big supprise. A single frame scan at 2400 DPI takes about 20 Minutes! I have tried dropping back to 1200 to see if the scans are acceptable. Even at 1200 it will take a long time to complete this job.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-19-2002, 04:48 PM
chris h's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Northern UK
Posts: 991
I'm just in the process of getting hold of a combo usb2/firewire card and I'll be interested to see if there is much improvement in the 2450 scanning times with either or connection.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-19-2002, 06:14 PM
KevinBE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 511
I am using USB 2.0 with my 2450. I doubt if you will see any improvement with firewire, even though in realworld test firewire is faster. I don't see any speed advantage with USB 2.0 at the higher DPI settings just in the lower res scans. At high res the speed of the sensor slows down so much that even parallel would work as fast.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-19-2002, 07:10 PM
Ed_L's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: northwest Indiana, about 45 minutes from Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,821
I just checked out this scanner on the Epson site. It is referred to as a "lightning fast scanner". Does everybody have the long scanning times Kevin mentioned?

Ed
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-20-2002, 06:06 AM
chris h's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Northern UK
Posts: 991
Am I right in assuming that USB2 card to USB2 enabled device doesn't require anything other than a standard USB cable?
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-20-2002, 09:55 AM
d_kendal's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 829
As far as I know, it needs a USB 2.0 Cable (here )

- David
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-20-2002, 10:01 AM
chris h's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Northern UK
Posts: 991
Thanks for the link Dave that place is only 15 minutes drive from me. Could you get something a little closer in future!!!


Cheers...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-20-2002, 11:19 AM
KevinBE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 511
I tried the silverfast software that came with the scanner and the scan times were much improved. I was able to scan a 35mm negative frame at 2400 DPI in 5 minutes. I don't know why the twain driver is so slow. It may just be because the transparency function is slower than the normal type of scan.

At resolutions below 600 DPI the scanner is very fast. Much faster than my 1240U photo scanner. But, at high resolutions the bottleneck is the sensor speed.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-20-2002, 01:49 PM
KevinBE's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 511
Well the mystery has been solved. I started checking the output of Silverfast against the twain driver. The silverfast file was 5 Meg and the twain driver was 95 Meg. Something wasn't right here, there should be that much difference in the file size. I found that the twain driver has set the scale to 465%. No wonder it took so long! The rescan at 100% scale and 1200 DPI took 2 1/4 minutes. Now that's more like it.

I like the twain driver over the silverfast program because the twain driver identifies the individual frames and allows you to set each frame individually but scan in a batch when the settings for each has been set.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-20-2002, 01:55 PM
chris h's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Northern UK
Posts: 991
We don't get the Silverfast software with the 2450 in the UK but I've been resurrecting a lot of colour negatives with good results using the twain option.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-20-2002, 11:28 PM
d_kendal's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 829
Quote:
Originally posted by chris h
Thanks for the link Dave that place is only 15 minutes drive from me. Could you get something a little closer in future!!!


Cheers...
sure chris.. that worked out well, I was just searching on google.co.uk to hopefully find something on the same continent at least!
Re: 2450 Demise - that stinks for anybody who just bought it, but I hope if it really is happening, that it'll take the price down to an affordable level.

- David
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-21-2002, 02:35 AM
chris h's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Northern UK
Posts: 991
I'm not really concerned about the 2450's replacement I'll keep it a couple of years until its replacement has been replaced !! There's never a right time to buy computer hardware.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Epson Perfection 2450 on sale KevinBE Hardware 0 06-06-2003 04:24 PM
Differences between Epson 2400 & 2450 jbygden Hardware 4 01-07-2003 10:09 AM
2450 connectivity/firewire/usb2 chris h Hardware 20 10-29-2002 11:38 AM
Epson 2450 Scanner Settings pstewart Input/Output/Workflow 4 10-16-2002 02:53 PM
Epson 2450 scanner? jeaniesa Hardware 25 06-15-2002 08:08 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2008 Doug Nelson. All Rights Reserved




1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51