RetouchPRO

Go Back   RetouchPRO > Tools > Hardware
Register Blogs FAQ Site Nav Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Hardware Computers, displays, tablets, scanners, cameras, printers, etc.

Canon raises the bar!

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 09-16-2003, 08:02 PM
KevinBE's Avatar
KevinBE KevinBE is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 511
Canon raises the bar!

Some of you may already know this but I just found it last night. Canon is releasing a new digital SLR. The Canon Rebel 300D should begin shipping in a couple of weeks. This is a 6.1 MP camera using the same sensor as the Canon EOS D10. It is built on the Rebel EOS frame, a plastic body camera, and will sell for 899.00 for the body, 999 for the body and a 17-55 lense.

This is going to really shake up the digital world. They surprised everyone including some of their competition. This camera will use any of the EF lenses and also accept a new EF-S lense which takes advantage of the short distance between the sensor and the end of the lens. Phil has a full review at www.dpreview.com .

This is so going to really take the market by storm! I can't believe that they brought this to market without a single competitor chalenge. I bet Nikon is scrambling to see what they can cut off of the D100 so that they can get in this market.

I am rethinking my plans to go with the D100. But I guess I will wait to see how this plays out.
Reply With Quote top
  #2  
Old 09-16-2003, 08:35 PM
catia's Avatar
catia catia is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 255
Kevin,

It is already shipping. I know some folks that have one and have seen some images. http://www.innographx.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=726


Check this site for availability.

http://ww2.onecall.com/PID_20967.htm

And here is a review. http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos300d/

Catia

Last edited by catia; 09-16-2003 at 08:46 PM.
Reply With Quote top
  #3  
Old 09-16-2003, 10:43 PM
KevinBE's Avatar
KevinBE KevinBE is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 511
Thanks Catia, I haven't seen that vendor before. I'll have to check them out. I guess I've been living under a rock to miss that camera release. I just don't have enough time to get to all the forums every night.
Reply With Quote top
  #4  
Old 09-17-2003, 06:35 PM
KevinBE's Avatar
KevinBE KevinBE is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 511
Each to his own Don. I certainly would prefer the SLR. Especially when a "live preview" is all you can get. I get tired of having to put up with the LCD monitor in bright sunlight. That is a real big problem with the prosumer digitals with no through the lens look to go by. They do have their advantages some times but give me a good ttl viewfinder anyday over the monitor. It's also almost impossible to do real live action shots.

With the SLR you don't have to post specs on zoom or F stop ratings because you can make it whatever you want just by changing the lens.

I'm tired of limitations with the standard digital cameras. I want the flexability of the SLR.
Reply With Quote top
  #5  
Old 09-17-2003, 10:39 PM
KevinBE's Avatar
KevinBE KevinBE is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 511
Wow, think of all the money the Pros could save by not buying those high priced SLRs. Maybe you should run out there and tell them before anymore of them waste their money. I know I'm impressed.
Reply With Quote top
  #6  
Old 09-18-2003, 12:45 PM
CJ Swartz's Avatar
CJ Swartz CJ Swartz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Metro Phoenix area, Arizona
Posts: 3,345
Blog Entries: 19
Cameras are simply tools, but good tools can make a pro's job easier. Photography has many different types of subject matter, and the tools of the trade can vary from subject to subject.

Wildlife photography, journalistic photography and fashion photography make more use of speed than does portrait photography or commercial photography. The speed (frames per second) of non-digital pro-level SLRs such as the Nikon F5 (8 fps) still outpaces the fps of the digital SLR (4.5 or so) or digital non-SLRs. For most photographers, that difference is unimportant. For the pros who make their living by catching the nuances of an elk's gaze or strut -- it is vitally important. Some wildlife photographers also routinely use very large lenses -- 600mm or 800mm.

We decide what type of photography we are going to shoot, what our budget will bear, and buy the equipment that fits our own particular needs... or, more likely, the equipment that just makes our mouths water when we see it and that we can make up a good story for why we need it.

I already own Nikon glass, and have been waiting for a reasonably priced, high-quality digital body to attach to it. Thought it might be the D100, but the Canon EOS 300D "delivers sharper images with more visible detail... with virtually no noise visible" in DPreview's comparison with the D100. The Sony 828 looks delicious with excellent glass (within its limits of 28-200). My biggest lens is a 400mm, and the digital 200 is somewhat less than my 400. What I usually shoot now, however, is my Oly 2100 with a 10x zoom -- it's limited in shutter speed, frame rate, and resolution, but it gives me the benefits of digital (seeing the results immediately and being able to retake some shots).

Don't know what I'll end up with, but it's sure fun seeing all the new stuff coming down the road!
Reply With Quote top
  #7  
Old 09-18-2003, 12:58 PM
Toad's Avatar
Toad Toad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 177
I also am very interested in the new Sony - and am considering it well above the new Canon (for my needs).

The biggest advantage in my mind to the Canon is the quality of the sensor - and the apparent lack of perceptable noise even at high ISO. This is a significant feature - and really intrigues me.

To put it in perspective, however, I am NOT a Pro, and my requirements are hugely different from a Pro's. My primary digicam is a Canon S40 - and while this is a great compact camera. it would not be considered a Pro camera by anyone.

I am going for a much more simplistic approach - make sure that your camera is with you and not in the closet at home - get the images where and when they occur - even if they have a significantly lower base quality. That's why the Lord gave us PhotoShop.

However, I do get the hankering from time to time for a really good camera. My simplistic approach won't let me go back to the bad old days (my opinion) of carrying a bag filled with lenses and other doodads - because I am not a Pro - I don't want that anymore.

For me - the Sony F828 looks like the perfect combination of size, great capabiities, and a lens that will meet 98% of my photo requirements.

But that's not knocking the Canon - the right tool for the right person I say.

Just my 1 cent.

Toad
Reply With Quote top
  #8  
Old 09-18-2003, 01:11 PM
jeaniesa's Avatar
jeaniesa jeaniesa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Colorado foothills
Posts: 1,826
Kevin,

I've looked closely at the specs and reviews for both the Canon 300D and the Sony 828. With the features I'm used to on my Sony 717, I feel like I'd be taking a step backwards in terms of flexibility of parameter choices if I went with the 300D. So, if I can get my mom to buy out my half of the 717 (we bought it together and aren't doing a very good job of "sharing" ), I'm most likely going to get the 828.

As far as I can tell, the major plusses (in my mind) of the 300D are the larger range of apertures (good for portraits), the faster focusing (good for sports) and the larger sensor (less noise at the faster ISOs). However, inability to select a metering mode in the "Creative" exposure modes is a major minus for me, as is the lack of a histogram! Wow, in my mind that is a major feature to leave out! I was in a PS class with a bunch of portrait photographers last year and the instructor spent half the morning on the camera histograms and helping the photographers to set the correct exposure on their cameras using the histogram and a gray card. I rely on my Sony histogram all of the time b/c it tells me the "real" story of my exposure - not the LCD (or viewfinder). Also, the lack of flash compensation is another feature I would really miss. And from the pictures I've seen, the new RGB+E sensor that Sony has put in the 828 makes a huge difference - esp. in picking up details in red tones. (This is a problem I've had with the 717 which I solve by purposefully underexposing. I don't know how the Canon sensor handles reds, so I can't comment on how the RGB+E sensor compares to the Canon. All I know is that photos from the RGB+E looks 10x better than the 717 and I've heard from friends with other prosumer cameras that they have the same problem with vibrant reds blowing out.)

Anyway, for my style of shooting, it's looking like I'll be much happier with the Sony. That's not to say that Canon hasn't significantly raised the bar for DSLRs! They certainly have!! But, if I had to choose today, I'd choose the Sony 828 over the Canon 300D. (Or wait for the next generation of "less expensive" DSLRs to be announced.)

My $.02.

Jeanie

Last edited by jeaniesa; 09-18-2003 at 05:04 PM.
Reply With Quote top
  #9  
Old 09-18-2003, 04:38 PM
KevinBE's Avatar
KevinBE KevinBE is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lake Charles, LA
Posts: 511
The fact that a DSLR of this caliber and price was on the market was my only point. This is bound to start a real shift in the market and make fairly good DSLRs available for those not willing to spend 2000.00 for a DSLR lens and flash. My original wish list had the Nikon D100 at the top.

Everyone has their own budget and style of shooting. I shoot fairly well with my digital, but I know it's weaknesses and have a work-around on most of them. For my money I will naturally want to get the most bang for the buck with the emphasis on high quality pictures, which ever one that leads me to.

I have started shooting film again also and I don't like all the post processing that goes with it. Even now with a good film scanner I am talking about at least an hour to convert to digital. That is not acceptable for my style and time schedule.

I didn't make any bad comments about any specific digital camera. I know that their are a bunch of good ones out there now. We've come along way in the past three years. But take it from me, when they said that digital wasn't as good as film they must have been taking about large format film. I am going to get back out of film very soon.
Reply With Quote top
  #10  
Old 09-18-2003, 06:33 PM
catia's Avatar
catia catia is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 255
Kevin,

You are not the only one that thinks this camera will change the DSLR market. For example Phil Askey had this to say.

"This camera is probably the most fundamentally important step for digital SLR's since the introduction of the Nikon D1. It will place digital SLR's into the hands of consumers (with a moderate budget) and will probably also have a very strong negative effect on the $1,000 prosumer digital camera market."

He goes on to say, "The EOS 300D is a formidable camera, not from a feature set point of view. Not from a body finish point of view (which is actually better than I'm sure you're thinking). Not from how its feature set compares to other digital SLR's (although it can certainly hold its own), but rather for what it offers, for its value for money. And for what this camera could mean for the future of digital SLR's and the entire prosumer digital camera market. There's no doubt that there is an important place for cameras such as Sony's DSC-F828 and Minolta's DiMAGE A1, but you would have to be wearing blinkers not to realize that anyone considering spending over $1000 on an all-in-one camera such as that will now put the EOS 300D Kit high on their list."

As several folks have noted, to each their own. I have nothing against one camera or the other. I do believe the DSLR has its place and I for one enjoy mine.

My respectful comments and I am not bashing anyone or anything.

Catia
Reply With Quote top
Reply

  RetouchPRO > Tools > Hardware


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAW Image Thumbnailer and Viewer Syd Software 4 08-21-2007 11:51 AM
Canon S45 to XP home upload Old Canoeist Hardware 3 02-27-2007 11:53 AM
HP 7900 or Canon i9900 ? 1STLITE Input/Output/Workflow 8 05-24-2004 09:20 AM
Missing scroll bar? CJ Swartz Website Feedback 38 09-08-2002 04:50 AM
Canon S800 Printer Marni Hardware 11 09-03-2001 08:49 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2016 Doug Nelson. All Rights Reserved