| Notices | Welcome to RetouchPRO . You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload images and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. | | Hardware Computers, displays, tablets, scanners, cameras, printers, etc. | 
08-22-2006, 01:53 PM
|  | Member | | Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Houston, Texas USA
Posts: 59
| | | Major Mini for the Money Hi,
Mac Mini (non-Intel)
1.25GHz
512MB RAM
3 minutes, 03 seconds.
Better than I'd anticipated.
Not bad for $499.99 + tax. | 
08-22-2006, 02:43 PM
|  | Member | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Teaneck NJ
Posts: 92
| | | HI, as any one try out on a dual core P4 ???
Here is my result:
my machine :
P4 Intel 3.0 2mb cache, 160 GB SATA 2 16 mb cache, Intel 945 1066 Mhz,
2GB DDR 2 667 Mhz Dual chaneled
1:46
I've notice that quantity of RAM does imporve the performance on this task, but the speed of the proccesor, or maybe dual proccesor machine will perform more faster
Thanks | 
08-22-2006, 02:47 PM
|  | Member | | Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Houston, Texas USA
Posts: 59
| | Paul Thurston's 1.6 GHz machine did in 3:40 what my 1.25 GHz machine did in 3:03. Same amount of RAM.
He's on a PC - I'm on a Mac Mini (home computer) so maybe it's a Mac Thing... | 
08-23-2006, 12:45 PM
|  | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Fort Worth, Texas USA
Posts: 16
| | | After seeing how slow my Athlon 3000 desktop PC was compared to my 2.2GHz Pentium M Dell laptop PC, I decided it was time for an upgrade. So, I built a new PC:
Intel Core 2 Extreme 2.93GHz CPU
Asus P5W DH Deluxe Motherboard
4GB (4x1GB) Corsair DDR2-1066/PC2-8500 memory
2 x 150GB 10,000RPM Western Digital Raptor hard drives (no RAID)
750GB Seagate Barracuda 7200RPM hard drive
XFX GeForce 7600GT 256MD DDR3 video card
For an 8-bit file, the Radial Blur "benchmark" yielded the following:
Normal Clock @ 2.93GHz: 48 seconds
"Gentle" Overclock @ 3.3GHz: 42 seconds
Subsequently increasing the CPU multiplier a bit more for a 3.46GHz overclock, and also testing on a 16-bit file, these new numbers were observed:
8-bit: 41 seconds
16-bit: 46 seconds
(8/29/06)
Further tweaked system for 3.65GHz operation on FSB365 with DDR2-730 memory rate for 1:1 FSB:DRAM ratio, and memory timing of 3-3-3-8-4.
8-bit: 39 secs
16-bit: 42 secs
Regards,
Daryl
Last edited by Daryl Pritchard; 08-29-2006 at 10:42 AM.
| 
08-24-2006, 12:08 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: Princeton, NJ
Posts: 185
| | | Speed I've Got Dual-core P4, 3.2GHz, 2MbRam, Western Digital Raptor Hrddrives (10,000 RPM SATA)
1:40 | 
08-29-2006, 08:37 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1
| | P4 3.0 ghz HT
1.5 gb ram
primary ps scratch disc on a 2x200gb sata raid 0
in background: outlook, word, 2 ie windows, directory opus
1 min 42 secs
I was pleasently surprised. I've been cursing this machine lately. Maybe all I need is more ram. | 
08-29-2006, 02:01 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1
| | | Time: 17:55
Cpu: Athlon 1.4 Thunderbird
Mainboard: K7ama
Ram: 785 Pc133 SDRAM
Video: AGP GForce 3 Ti 200 64MB Ram
Windows 2000 SP4
photoshop 6.0
What gives?
Last edited by simonbelmont; 08-29-2006 at 02:06 PM.
| 
08-29-2006, 02:10 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 25
| | | :43 seconds
G5 Dual 2.7 GHz processor
2.5 gb ram
cs2 | 
08-29-2006, 02:39 PM
|  | Junior Member | | Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: S. Alabama
Posts: 16
| | | Test AMD athlon XP 2000+
1.66 GHz, 512 MB RAM
Windows XP Pro
Time:5:35
That's a long render time for any project! Time for more speedie computer me thinks. | 
09-03-2006, 02:16 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2
| | | The Real speed test. I couldnt believe some of the times on here until I realized the test is not the same one I see floating on the internet that is alot more demanding on your system. That test can be downloaded at http://www.retouchartists.com/pages/speedtest.html
The following results are for the test above. When I get back home I will post the results of the test that is the topic of this thread.
Specs: Homebuilt
Supermicro H8DC8 Motherboard
2 -285 Opteron processors (dual core for a total of 4 cores)
8 gigs ram.
1 Maxtor SCSI U320 150 gig drive (O/S and applications)
1 Raid 0 array with 2 WD Raptor 1500's. (300 gig partition) used for scratch disk
Windows XP X64 bit edition, with Photoshop CS2 version 9.0.1
:34 seconds.
But the test runs the same at 4 gigs ram as 8 and the max mem in photoshop is still limited to 2786. I thought photoshop CS2 could use 4 gigs ram? I think if I tweaked the photoshop settings some more I could gain even more time. This was set at my raid 0 as scratch 1, my os drive as scratch 2, and history states set to 0.
I know nothing about photoshop so Im sure someone familiar with it would be able to optimize it further.
Geoff
Last edited by gbrandon; 09-03-2006 at 02:20 AM.
Reason: more info
| 
09-03-2006, 11:09 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 23
| | | AMD turion64 2.3 GHz
1 Gb ram
compaq presario laptop
very clean windows XP (much stuff turned off)
cs2
1:30 | 
09-03-2006, 12:13 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2
| | | Update Ok, to add to my update previously, my time on this test is
:18 seconds 8 bit.
:21 seconds 16 bit
And to answer my own questions about the ram, adobe has some great info on thier web regarding xp 64, more than 4 gigs ram, etc. Very interesting reading. Also some speed tips if you have 2 plus gigs. | 
09-04-2006, 10:13 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2
| | | 37 seconds
dual intel xeon 3.2G CPU
4GB memory with 3G switch
photoshop 9.02
windows xp pro with SP2
supermicro motherboard
scsi harddisk
Last edited by cmykphoto; 09-04-2006 at 10:19 AM.
| 
09-09-2006, 12:37 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Australia - A Dane Down Under
Posts: 28
| | | anyone got this info in a grid/ Hi guys and ladies,
does anyone have a graph or this setup in a grid from worst to best
also when doing this timing, how do you measure the time? ?using PS's own timing or with a stopwatch???
thanks
Henrik | 
09-12-2006, 04:35 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1
| | G5 Imac intel 2ghz duo
1gb ram
cs1 set to 50%
and considering it has to run rosetta too.......
1:20 (which i thought ain't to bad) |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:38 PM. | |
|