| Notices | Welcome to RetouchPRO . You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload images and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. | | History, Conservation, and Repair The history of photographic prints, and how best to care for and repair them. | 
06-08-2005, 11:15 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5
| | | Scanning Old B/W Photo - Odd 'spots' - Newbie Hi,
I'm new here & from what I've read so in this forum, there's a lot of experience here so I'm wondering if someone could help me here. I'm sure this has been discussed before, if so, please do point me in the right direction.
Basically, I'm trying to scan an old b&w family portrait & in the process of scanning i find that there's lots of 'spots' especially in the dark areas. I'm using the HP scanjet 8250 with the following settings :
Colour : Millions of colours
Res : 600dpi
Added descreen
A sample of the 'problem' is attached. Anyone has a suggestion as to what I should set for the scan or should this be cleaned up in PS?
Thanking you in advance for any advise! | 
06-09-2005, 04:09 AM
|  | Member | | Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Sydney - Australia
Posts: 80
| | | | 
06-09-2005, 04:13 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 494
| | | Those white marks do look a bit strange.
A couple of questions for you: Why are you using descreen? What size is the original? Is the print on textured paper? Is there any evidence of these white marks on the original? | 
06-09-2005, 11:25 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5
| | | Caitlin,
Thanks for your response!
Ok as for your questions, the only reason why I'm using descreen is simply because the results were better. To be honest, I'm not exactly sure what this function is.. ;-)
Anyway, it's looks like it's on textured paper, sort of glossy. As for the white marks, no, they do not seem obvious on the photo. I guessing that it's something to do with the texture & that in the process of scanning, the ridges causes some sort of 'reflection'?
Btw, the size is 6x4
raywong
Last edited by raywong; 06-10-2005 at 01:37 AM.
| 
06-10-2005, 09:02 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 517
| | | Silly Question Here...Could it have been a tweed suit and the white spots belong there? I remember a family member had a suit made of material that looked like this. Neb | 
06-10-2005, 09:08 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 494
| | | ray - I'd suggest trying to scan it again - without any auto settings, and without descreen. Post the result here - I'll be interested to see if this helps. If the paper is textured another thing to try is to scan the photo a couple of times at different rotations - as the reflection can be less, or two scans from different rotations can cancel each other out if overlayed. I don't think these spots look like paper texture though...
Last edited by Caitlin; 06-12-2005 at 07:01 PM.
Reason: fixed typos!
| 
06-11-2005, 08:02 AM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Guam
Posts: 171
| | Hi Ray,
I have a similar problem and I came across a "buried" thread from long ago. Quote: by Doug Nelson
The basic fault of most scanners, particularly less expensive scanners, is that they introduce noise into the darker areas. This manifests as random lighter dots. They aren't the same from scan to scan, so if we switch the new layer's mode from 'difference' to 'darken', the darkest value of each scan will be combined, eliminating any noise spots that aren't accidentally aligned.
| Here's the link to this thread- Multiple Scans | 
06-12-2005, 06:43 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5
| | Thanks all for your replay. Unfortunately, I do have the photo with me right now to retry the scan, but will do so tomorrow. Thanks so much for all the advise thus far... | 
06-20-2005, 02:04 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5
| | | Hi all,
Sincere apologies for the delay in responding as I was caught up with work the whole of last week.
In any case, as suggested by Caitlin, here's a rescan without the descreen.
Scan001 is without descreen, scan002 is with descreen (just for comparison) & scan003 is without descreen & sharpening is set to NONE.
In response to nebgranny, no this is not a tweed suit & actually just a 'standard' suit/blazer type of material. It doesn't look like it's the 'shiny' type of material.
Appreciate any feedback from anyone, thanks in advance. | 
06-20-2005, 03:42 AM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 494
| | | This is a bit of a mystery. What is the surface of the photo like? Is it shiny. matt, rough, smooth? | 
06-20-2005, 03:48 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 5
| | | It's actually a little 'shiny' & also 'bumpy'. I believe it's typical of the old portrait type of photo surface. FYI, this was taken in 72. | 
06-24-2005, 01:10 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: somewhere over there
Posts: 6,579
| | | ok, another question for you... have you ever cleaned your scanner surfaces, especially with water? these look like water residue to me. i'd suggest wiping the scanner down wth a dry, very soft, dust-free, cloth, tissue or newspaper (yup, newspaper) and scan again.
you might also try a VERY soft tissue or toilet paper very light wipe of the picture itself. NOTHING WET! if the original picture is in very bad physical shape, do NOT wipe it at all!
if the above produces no observable results, try running the image through polaroid's dust and scratch software.
Craig |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:23 PM. | |
|