RetouchPRO

Go Back   RetouchPRO > Technique > Image Help
Register Blogs FAQ Site Nav Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Chat Room


Image Help Got a problem image? Don't know where to begin? Upload images and ask our users what they think or if they can help

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 04-04-2005, 12:02 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5
Noisy JPEG Images

I have an image that I took with my old Olympus D600L camera that I absolutely love. Very noisy image and I'd love to be able to fix it without losing the edge detail. Anyone have any suggestions for the best approach. I've used both Dfine and Neat Image and neither give me satisfying results. I'm willing to spend some time on it, but wonder if anyone has any suggestions on how to keep the edges intact beyond using a mask or the history brush to paint the edges back in? Some nifty 'edge' trick????

TIA,
KJ Sargenti
Attached Images
File Type: jpg chris_sm.jpg (22.8 KB, 87 views)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-04-2005, 08:08 AM
Duv's Avatar
Duv Duv is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia
Posts: 1,213
You may want to try byRo 10 minute Toolkit.atn. You' find it in the Resource section of RetouchPro.

Cheers
Dave
Attached Images
File Type: jpg D-chris_sm.jpg (75.5 KB, 39 views)

Last edited by Duv; 04-04-2005 at 08:18 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-04-2005, 09:55 AM
cardmnal's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Jackson Hole, Wyoming
Posts: 284
Blog Entries: 3
kjsargenti@hawa, first let me say welcome to RP.

Are you just looking for a shortcut for future projects? I ask because this image really isn't that time intensive. I did a quickie job in about a minute and a half using a layer mask.


1) Duplicate layer.
2) Apply gaussian blur
3) Hold alt and click the mask button on the bottom of the tool pallet (this fills the mask with black).
4) Using white paint and a smallish air brush I painted the edges to remove the noise.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg chris_sm.jpg (48.2 KB, 41 views)

Last edited by cardmnal; 04-04-2005 at 10:06 AM. Reason: missing image
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-04-2005, 12:30 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5
Thanks to both of you. Downloaded byRo. And, to the question about shortcuts, yes... I have lots of old photos from the D600L that I'd love to be able use.

Mahalo, KJ
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-04-2005, 01:52 PM
akj's Avatar
akj akj is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Parshallville, MI
Posts: 134
Unhappy Where's Da Noise?

Forgive me for asking but what is this "noise" exactly? For some reason I can't see what you guys are talking about . . . Help!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-04-2005, 04:18 PM
Gary Richardson's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 2,717
Have to agree with you Amanda. On the basis of the posted image, there is little noise on the image. Quite a bit of posterisation due to reducing it to 100K, but not too much noise. That's not to say that the original image is without it though, therefore the advice given is valid.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-04-2005, 05:35 PM
cardmnal's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Jackson Hole, Wyoming
Posts: 284
Blog Entries: 3
Posterization, is that what it is called. It's not what I consider photographic noise but there is some distortion along the edges of the oar and with closer inspection along the shoreline and skyline. that is what I attemprted to repair.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-05-2005, 12:29 AM
Gary Richardson's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 2,717
Cardmnal the areas you're talking about look to have some jpg artifacts, and your way of getting rid of them works fine.

Posterisation is what is visible across all of the image, and is caused by compressing a large file down to a much smaller one. In doing this, what is lost is the smooth transition from one colour or shade to another. Instead the transitions become stepped, giving an effect very similar to the one created by the posterising filter in PS.

The posterisation fault will not be on the original image, so will not be the "noise" that KJ Sarjenti is trying to remove. Perhaps a close up of the noise he wants removing would be helpful.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-05-2005, 09:23 AM
cardmnal's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Jackson Hole, Wyoming
Posts: 284
Blog Entries: 3
Cool, I love learning new stuff...even terminology.

Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-05-2005, 02:49 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5
It seems I used the wrong terms for what is the problem... but it's the pixelization in the water and sky, (and in my grandson's face) that I object to. Using blur and a mask, I was able to get rid of the most of it, but lost the edge definition in the clouds/sky both sky & relection on water. The major edges between land/sky/canoe/grandson I was able to keep via the mask, but when bringing them back into the cloud/sky area, it re-introduced more pizelization that I wanted. Frankly, I was hoping for a magic bullet... <smile>

Thanks to all for your feedback,

Aloha, Kathy
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-05-2005, 04:34 PM
Duv's Avatar
Duv Duv is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia
Posts: 1,213
I thought I gave you a magic bullet with byRo artifact reduction. Did you try it? Seemed to work really well for me with the second pop up setting of 1.

Cheers
Dave
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-05-2005, 04:41 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5
I did try it and it certainly improved the image by leaps and bounds, but there is still pixelization in area of the water (which I can fix by hand) and the clouds/sky definition is softened - which has been my main concern.

I think the bottom line is though all these amazing tools are... well, amazing - "sometimes" you still can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear. The D600L's resolution is just too low for me to be able to get a great 8X10 out if it. I'll just have to enjoy this one in a smaller size.

Thanks again to you and everybody else for their input... This forum is a wonderful and though I'm very new here, I've already learned a lot reading the posts on this forum. Thanks!

Aloha, Kathy
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-05-2005, 07:03 PM
Duv's Avatar
Duv Duv is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia
Posts: 1,213
I used to own a D600L. My very first digital. Loved it too except it drove me nuts trying to focus in low light.
Just one last thing. You want to print an 8 x 10. What size is the image when you load it into Photoshop? You might get better results in either using a program like Genuine Fractals to increase image size or this:

Create an action and hit record:

Go to Image: Image Size: Change Width and Height to 105%.
Stop recording Action.
Run the action as many times as you need to get the size up to 8 x 10. Sometimes the pixelation is much less noticeable. Then run byRo's action.

Let me know if it helps.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-05-2005, 07:31 PM
akj's Avatar
akj akj is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Parshallville, MI
Posts: 134
Thumbs down Aaah!

Yes--I see it now . . . thanks for the clarification everyone. I feel better now.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-08-2005, 08:02 AM
Flora's Avatar
Moderator
Patron
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Milan, Italy
Posts: 2,296
Blog Entries: 3
Hi kjsargenti@hawa,

Welcome to RP!

I had a go at your picture using the method described in this Tutorial to minimize pixelization and .jpg artifacts
Attached Images
File Type: jpg F_chris_sm1.jpg (96.3 KB, 34 views)
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 04-08-2005, 06:20 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5
Wow! Great job. I've printed out the tutorial.. thanks so much, I think I'll be able to do a beautiful job on the full size photo. Thanks again,

Kathy
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 04-09-2005, 07:22 AM
creeduk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 297
Check out PS CS2 it has a noise reduction plugin when it comes and it has a remove jpeg artifact option , it allows use of channels and this is all done in one interface it looks great. I know this is not out today but I thought it was worth a mention.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 04-10-2005, 01:52 PM
venivedi's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Seoul
Posts: 93
Quote:
Originally Posted by creeduk
Check out PS CS2 it has a noise reduction plugin when it comes and it has a remove jpeg artifact option , it allows use of channels and this is all done in one interface it looks great. I know this is not out today but I thought it was worth a mention.
For a moment...it was read as 'a new PS (playstation)'
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 04-10-2005, 09:39 PM
creeduk's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 297
lmao, no there is no new playstation with built in photoshop....just the new photoshop CS2.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
how to batch convert raw images to jpeg sunkist4338 Input/Output/Workflow 19 01-22-2012 09:44 AM
help on resizing JPEG Images w/ minimal pixelation PSource Photoshop Help 1 12-22-2005 08:10 AM
Resizing images for RetouchPRO jeaniesa Photo Retouching 18 09-26-2005 12:20 AM
jpeg images christo Photo Restoration 1 04-19-2003 05:51 PM
I believe I messed up the Board billglaw Photo Restoration 25 01-09-2003 02:02 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2008 Doug Nelson. All Rights Reserved