| Notices | Welcome to RetouchPRO . You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload images and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. | | Image Help Got a problem image? Don't know where to begin? Upload images and ask our users what they think or if they can help | 
06-25-2005, 07:24 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 12
| | | Background - Is it possible? Hi, I am wondering if there is any way to replace the background behind the veil in this picture sample. For example I would like to put a flower or something behind it, or at the very least change the pattern of the curtain to something more subtle. Thanks. | 
06-25-2005, 08:29 AM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Lancashire
Posts: 927
| | | Hello Wayne welcome to the forum,
Could you possibly show us a large picture, at present that is too tiny for me to see a veil let alone help you to blend out the background.
Elle | 
06-25-2005, 09:12 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Metro Phoenix area, Arizona
Posts: 2,662
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Wayne27 Hi, I am wondering if there is any way to replace the background behind the veil in this picture sample. For example I would like to put a flower or something behind it, or at the very least change the pattern of the curtain to something more subtle. Thanks. |
All you need to do is make a selection of the area that you want to replace and replace it with the flower (or something else). The veil makes an almost perfect triangle, so it would be easy to use the pen tool (using photoshop, PSP and Photoshop Elements have a pen tool also, I believe) to click on three corners to select the area you want to work with, and then paste the image of the flower in its place. You can use Hue/Saturation to lighten AND desaturate the veil so you don't notice the original background showing behind it. Adding some noise to the veil can also help hide the original background. The veil would appear to be opaque and not show the new background through it. Depends on what look you're going for... | 
06-25-2005, 10:37 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: somewhere over there
Posts: 6,583
| | depending on whether this 'sample' is all you're going to use or if you're wanting to work with a larger picture and you just posted the sample as an example, i might do this different ways. for, what i did in my attempt was based solely on the sample being the entire picture you want and not part of something larger.
the first thing i did was take most of the saturation out of the image. this blends most of the background into the veil. the veil is white, so de-saturating it doesnt alter the white much.
this then made it very easy to select out the veil from the rest of the image. i cleaned it up a bit along the edges with a simple eraser tool and adjusted the contrast, lightness and saturation to taste.
then i simply used another picture; in this case, janet petty's mimosas found here in this thread: http://www.retouchpro.com/forums/photo-based-art/10851-mimosa-blooming.html and control-c'd it and then copied it into the new veil image as a new layer.
i then reversed the layer positions so the veil was on top and adjusted the opacity of that layer so the flowers would show through.
i then copied out the layers as a new image, change the file type to .jpg and optimized for size to fit on retouch.
and that's it.
the problem with how i did this is if you're working with a full picture of which this sample is only a small part. my method wouldnt work then and you'd have to do something different.
Craig | 
06-29-2005, 03:02 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 12
| | | Thanks Thanks for the help, i think ive got the idea, i do in fact have a whole background to change but think i can do it now. | 
06-29-2005, 03:06 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: somewhere over there
Posts: 6,583
| | ok, good
if you run into problems, post some more images, larger this time. like i said, the technique i gave you wouldnt necessarily work if what you posted was from a larger picture.
and even if you dont have any more difficulties with it, post your results. i'd love to see it.
Craig | 
07-01-2005, 08:57 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 12
| | | First Attempt Ok heres the two pictures, Im not happy with it but basically its just an exercise for learning at the moment, ill have another go later. I cut out the Veil that needed to be replaced, desaturated it as suggested. Cut the main person out and placed on new background, put the veil back in as a layer and then changed the opacity of the veil layer to get the result. Probably there is a better way , but i gave it a go anyway. Im a newbie to Photoshop (and graphics) and have a lot to learn. Thanks for your help.
Wayne | 
07-01-2005, 03:07 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: somewhere over there
Posts: 6,583
| | | well, basically, you did a great job. i'll pass on one extra trick you might try using here. take your clone tool and have both images showing. right click the clone tool over the original to pick up the image. have your opacity set pretty low, like at 40 or less. then, on the 2nd image, right click the image down on it. that will transfer the parts from the one to other.
this works well in your two images because the area between her legs in both images is bluish. so what little of the blue behind the veil passes over to the other image gets lost in the background on the 2nd image. so you end up with just a bit more veil showing there.
here's my example. this took about 2 minutes to do.
and, if you want the veil showing more, just increase the opacity or pass over the area again.
Craig | 
07-02-2005, 06:29 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 207
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Wayne27 Ok heres the two pictures, Im not happy with it but basically its just an exercise for learning at the moment, ill have another go later. I cut out the Veil that needed to be replaced, desaturated it as suggested. Cut the main person out and placed on new background, put the veil back in as a layer and then changed the opacity of the veil layer to get the result. Probably there is a better way , but i gave it a go anyway. Im a newbie to Photoshop (and graphics) and have a lot to learn. Thanks for your help.
Wayne |
Wayne, have you given thought to putting in a bit of shadow on the water from your model?
That might deepen the already beautiful replacement job you've done.
Maureen | 
07-02-2005, 06:46 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 494
| | | Very impressive job indeed! I'm a bit confused about the original image though - where was the curtain? In your first very small sample attachment the veil is over the colourful curtain print, but in the full attachment in your later post it is over white. Is this where you have already desaturated and re-pasted? | 
07-03-2005, 02:01 AM
|  | Moderator Patron | | Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Milan, Italy
Posts: 2,058
| | Hi Wayne27,
Welcome to RP!
Quoting Caitlin " Very impressive job indeed!"
The one thing I would correct is the rather strong 'orangy' glow on the woman ... The original picture was taken indoors, the lights were on and she was surrounded by reddish-brown furniture ... all this gave a yellow/orange cast to her skin ... which was and looked natural there .... The new background, however, casts a cyan/green/acqua glow, so, in spite of a seamless transition with it, the original yellow/orangy skin cast, makes her look out of place and somehow too 'opaque' for her new surroundings...
I overdid it a bit in my attachment, but I only wanted to show you what I meant.. Graig,
great job!! | 
07-04-2005, 06:58 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 12
| | Craig, Thanks for your help i appreciate it.
Maureen, Yes thats a great idea , however i dont know where start. ill have a look around and see if i can do it.
Caitlin, Im sorry for the confusion, the original picture was a samle from a different pic as I thought that this one may have been unsuitable, after looking around the site I decided its probably acceptable.
Flora, Thanks, I noticed this as well but wasnt quite sure how to go about fixing it. Now I have an example i can experiment.
Thank you all for your comments and help, hopefully in the future i will be able to contribute as well.
Wayne | 
07-04-2005, 09:32 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: somewhere over there
Posts: 6,583
| | flora,
thank you  and yes, going from indoors to outdoors always changes things. good on spotting and handling that.
wayne,
you're welcome. let us know if you have more questions.
Craig | 
07-05-2005, 06:36 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 12
| | | Maureen, Yes thats a great idea , however i dont know where start. ill have a look around and see if i can do it. | 
07-06-2005, 12:38 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 207
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Wayne27 Maureen, Yes thats a great idea , however i dont know where start. ill have a look around and see if i can do it. | Well, how I do that is not in PS, I use Photo Impact for shadows. I have my selection active (which would be your model) then apply the shadow, adjusting it till it looks right, then merge or flatten the layers.
If you have your project still saved in an unflattened format, you can email it to me if you'd like and have a go at the shadow for you.
Maureen |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:38 PM. | |
|