RetouchPRO

Go Back   RetouchPRO > Technique > Image Help
Register Blogs FAQ Site Nav Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Image Help Got a problem image? Don't know where to begin? Upload images and ask our users what they think or if they can help

Critique me, please-hit me with your best shot :)

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 07-18-2002, 10:01 AM
G Mantero G Mantero is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 30
Critique me, please-hit me with your best shot :)

See attached picture. In general, I'm pretty happy with it, but have some concern about the boy's clothes blowing out a bit. I've done some selective dodging/burning to help with problem areas, but am not happy with the results.

FYI: This client specifically requested that the picture remain "old looking" and I think I succeeded at that. I've given the picture off to her and she's thrilled with it. However, being the perfectionist that I am, I've continued to tweak with it here and there in my spare (hahahahahahahahaha) time.

Onscreen it looks a little darker in the shadows than the actual print, which has a nice level of detail, even in the boy's boots.

Anyway, I guess I'm here asking--whaddaya think? Would you have paid me for it?

Thanks much!!
Reply With Quote top
  #2  
Old 07-18-2002, 10:03 AM
G Mantero G Mantero is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 30
D'OH! Photo here

Apparently I know nothing about attaching photos
Attached Images
File Type: jpg boy before-after.jpg (42.8 KB, 89 views)
Reply With Quote top
  #3  
Old 07-18-2002, 12:19 PM
jeaniesa's Avatar
jeaniesa jeaniesa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Colorado foothills
Posts: 1,826
Gerry,

I'm not saying this to just give you a pat on the back... I think you did a fantastic job with this one. I downloaded the photo and played around with it for a bit (just enough to get a feel for what information was actually available in the photo - nothing to share here.) The problem is, while it seems that there must be more detail in the clothes, it appears that the "information" there is mostly just noise/damage. So, if you clean that up, there's nothing left. I have always found it difficult to burn in "shadows" that look like realistic folds in clothing. I'm sure some people can, but I'm not good at it.

That being said, if you think the highlights are too bright, you might try duplicating the (final) layer and setting it to multiply mode, then add a layer mask so that only the clothing is affected. When I did this, I liked the look with the opacity at about 25%. This gives slightly more "depth" to the shadows, but does reduce the brightest area of the photo, so you'll have to decide if you like that or not.

You could also try a "reverse fill flash" technique, using color burn to darken the light areas rather than color dodge to lighten the dark areas. (If you have Katrin Eismann's book, look up "fill flash" in the index. If you don't have it, let me know and I'll be more specific.) I tried this and found it similar to the multiply version I did. Again - limited the effect to the clothing by adding a layer mask.

However, I really think these are just ideas for you to try to see if you like the result any better than what you got. I honestly can't decide if I like the multiply mode better or not because it does tone down the highlights a bit and therefore the "punch" that the photo has as it is. In any case, I think you did a wonderful job on the boy's face, which is the most important part of the photograph.

If I were a client, I would be very, very happy with what you did. (And I'm very much a perfectionist as well.)

Jeanie
Reply With Quote top
  #4  
Old 07-18-2002, 12:51 PM
DannyRaphael's Avatar
DannyRaphael DannyRaphael is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Near Seattle, Washington, USA
Posts: 6,300
Gerry:

Before I read Jeanie's post I opened your image. After seeing the before/after and reading her comments I thought, "She's got this one nailed suggestion-wise on the dress detail." Hard to restore what ain't there to begin with and sometimes extremely challenging to recreate.

My .02 would be to possibly extend / darken the background shadows a bit (left side of the image - close to her shoulders / back and next to left arm) ... thus giving a little more contrast between the the dress and the background. I found the sort-of glowing effect slightly distracting, but not a whole lot.

Other than that, Voila! I can see why your client was very pleased. Congrats on a job well done.

~DannyR~
Reply With Quote top
  #5  
Old 07-18-2002, 01:54 PM
Ed_L's Avatar
Ed_L Ed_L is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: northwest Indiana, about 45 minutes from Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,824
Please tell me I'm right this time. Isn't the name "Gina"? I seem to remember that from some time ago, but as usual, I'm probably wrong again.

On to the image ... I was thinking along the same lines as Jeanie when she suggested the multiply layer. It's probably hard to tell with the attachment just how much there really is to work with, but it *looks* like there might be more detail in the dress than you were able to save. You'll probably know better than we do if it's possible to get more out of it or not. I also agree with Danny about darkening that part of the background a little. I noticed that before I read the replies, but I wasn't sure if it was worth mentioning. There's no doubt that you've improved the image greatly already. Most people would be more than happy to pay for something like that.

Ed
Reply With Quote top
  #6  
Old 07-18-2002, 02:03 PM
jeaniesa's Avatar
jeaniesa jeaniesa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Colorado foothills
Posts: 1,826
Doh!

Ed, I think you're right about it being Gina! Doh!
Jeanie
Reply With Quote top
  #7  
Old 07-18-2002, 02:11 PM
G Mantero G Mantero is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 30
Wink

Yup, it's Gina--but don't worry. Even my mom calls me by the wrong name sometimes!!

Thank you all for your great suggestions. I'll try that reverse fill-flash technique. I'm a huge fan of Katrin Eismann (what retoucher wouldn't be?) and have found many of her techniques useful in and of themselves, but they've also springboarded other ideas for me. Ah, inspiration!

It's a good thing when one can post a photo and get honest critiques. Many of my friends (who work daily with PS and know its power) ooohed and aaaahed over it, but no one had any constructive criticism.

I'll be posting here much more, I can tell! I used to come more than I'm able to currently. Pesky job
Reply With Quote top
  #8  
Old 07-18-2002, 05:29 PM
Mike Needham's Avatar
Mike Needham Mike Needham is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 542
Other than the general praise that you rightly recieve, I can only offer, colours are generally less brighton print. I think you have done a wonderful job, the whites are a little blown, but only a slight tweaking should be necc.
Reply With Quote top
  #9  
Old 07-18-2002, 07:10 PM
DannyRaphael's Avatar
DannyRaphael DannyRaphael is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Near Seattle, Washington, USA
Posts: 6,300
Yikes...

My apologies, too, Gina. Truly sorry 'bout that.

Really appreciate your understanding of our boo-boo and acceptance of our well-intended commentary.

In these types of endeavors, striving for excellence yourself and seeking the advice of others are sure ways to get better.

Given what you've shown skill and decision-wise on this particular effort, if it hasn't happened yet, it will: Folks will be coming to you for advice.

Continued success.

~DannyR~
Reply With Quote top
  #10  
Old 07-18-2002, 08:31 PM
Ed_L's Avatar
Ed_L Ed_L is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: northwest Indiana, about 45 minutes from Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,824
With over 600 members, it's easy enough to get someone's name wrong. I have no idea why I remembered it. I don't think she's been on the site much lately, but I remembered her from the early days. Must be the perfume!

Ed
Reply With Quote top
Reply

  RetouchPRO > Technique > Image Help


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Daily Critique -- from Craig Tanner's website CJ Swartz Photography 12 01-01-2010 10:26 PM
Critique it! Fashion shot phaqu Critiques 1 09-18-2007 12:54 PM
Salvaging A Bad Shot? Critique time. cardmnal Photo Retouching 18 03-07-2007 07:54 PM
Screen Shot Software..... bobkny Software 8 10-26-2003 11:02 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2016 Doug Nelson. All Rights Reserved