Hi Jon,
I agree with Juliana .. your last version is much better than the previous one!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jonk I have been restoring photos for historical libraries for years, and it was this type of work that always forced me to be that purest and to restore the photo back to their original state if at all possible. |
That's what for me is the base of 'restoring' a picture!!!
What I try to keep in mind is also that in the past pictures seldom had the high contrast, high quality and sharpness you see today ....
So, when working on these old 'mementoes', I never try to get it too smooth, too contrasty or too sharp as it would look very unnatural ....
If a non vital part of the picture is beyond help. well then, I rather crop it instead of wasting an enormous amount of time trying to get a result which, I know from the beginning, will never satisfy me ... (Of course you can't do it when working on historical pictures ...)
What I try not to forget is also that in the end, even though I must be satisfied with my work, it is the customer (well, not in my case as I don't do it professionally) who has to be satisfied with the result ... and, most of the times, even a minimal improvement is enough ... as long as the person photographed can be recognized after a restoration and as long as the 'customer gets a photograph and not a painting back ....
In other words ... what I learnt is that in photo restoration most of the time less is much, much more ...