RetouchPRO

Go Back   RetouchPRO > Technique > Input/Output/Workflow
Register Blogs FAQ Site Nav Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Input/Output/Workflow Scanning, printing, color management, and discussing best practices for control and repeatability

[Definition] DPI, SPI, PPI, and LPI

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #11  
Old 02-03-2002, 11:10 PM
john_opitz john_opitz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth,Texas
Posts: 230
Here's an article from Dan Margulis' book "Professional Photoshop 6", at his web site.

Resolution

The article is helpful for desktop printers as well.
Reply With Quote top
  #12  
Old 02-04-2002, 01:45 AM
Sam's Avatar
Sam Sam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Zimbabwe
Posts: 153
That is such a useful and informative article I've printed it out, so thanks for posting that link. One big mistake I've made often in the past is to think that the higher the resolution, the better - Not any more!!

One more painful crash from falling off a vertical learning curve has been avoided.

Long Live RetouchPRO!!!
Reply With Quote top
  #13  
Old 02-04-2002, 12:36 PM
Richard_Lynch's Avatar
Richard_Lynch Richard_Lynch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Western NY
Posts: 1,105
I'll stick out my neck a little here.

I think the consensus is pretty much correct:

LPI - Lines per inch (printer resolution, line frequency of dot rows)
PPI - Pixels per inch (display size)
SPI - Samples per inch (scanner resolution, samples -- not pixels)
DPI - Dots per inch (also a printer resolution, dots of ink, fixed size printer dots that make up screening dots)

I think you might want to add Total Pixels in there too.

While DPI is technically a printer term, it has varied meaning and is often used as a more-or-less universal term for SPI, PPI and DPI. I would probably consider this a casual use, and not get too uppity about it. Some people get downright upset. While it can be confusing if you just throw it out at random when you really mean something specific, it is also probably just as confusing to try and be specific consistently. I must admit, I use DPI incorrectly with great frequency as a generalization for resolution. In reality it is the wrong term, but it is one that people understand. However, I'll try and use them all correctly in the discussion that follows.

LPI and DPI are not interchangeable at all, and I don't believe they are ever interchanged – which is pretty curious as they are probably the most closely related. SPI and DPI are used interchangeably when referring to scans, but probably should not be, as your SPI can be different than the number of pixels produced by the sampling. PPI and DPI are used interchangeably for screen resolution, and probably should not be as DPI technically refers to printer dots. While there is a relation between the PPI and DPI in their effect on one another, the two terms are decidedly different because of what they inherently represent. PPI is essentially filtered into DPI via LPI.

Perhaps this is best looked at in context of a workflow.

An image is scanned with a scanner that has the ability to read at a specific number of samples per inch, or SPI. This is the number of details looked at in the object being scanned. The image resulting from the scan can be any PPI, really, as the samples can be used to create an interpolated (larger than the sample size), equivalent, or downsized result. In other words, the samples may be used differently to determine the pixel result. A similar thing happens in a camera. Once the sample data is turned to a digital file as pixels, the reference should probably technically be PPI, but really this is not quite right. The PPI actually matters less than the total pixels, as the number of pixels can be rearranged to cover different areas without actually changing image information. In other words, depending on how the scanner or camera handles sampling and turning the information into a digital file, the sample the file is not really SPI or PPI, but total pixels (that is stored information which does not necessarily have specific dimension). PPI is not really relevant to an image until there are display parameters in the file which give it dimension. When an image is displayed using the same information the pixel information is confined to dimension via PPI parameters. For example, on a monitor using 72PPI or 288PPI, the image will appear as 25% smaller at the higher PPI. This effects the presentation on screen and the eventually result in print due to the way it defines the image dimension -- not because PPI is equivalent to DPI.

Dots are pretty confusing as there are actually 2 types. There is an absolute dot, which is the smallest unit of ink the printer can print (the 'dot' in the DPI), and the screening dot (the size of the dot or 'line' in the LPI). The LPI dot may vary in shape and size, and is made up of a relative number of render dots which make up half-tone screening. LPI will define the number of rows of rendering dots (screens) used for creating the final image in print. DPI is the maximum resolution of the printer, that being the number of fixed-size printer dots it can make in a one-inch increment. These DPI dots are a fixed size for the printer (expressed as the resolution for the printer, in DPI). The maximum actual resolution is the LOWER of any 2 numbers reported by the manufacturer. 1200x600 DPI is really 600 DPI with a half-step sizing for the rows (which allows them to overprint). The number of DPI dots is really always the same, but the number of rows that can represent the dots and the dot shape is controlled by the number of dot lines (screen frequency, or LPI). LPI can be adjusted.

So, say a printer has a resolution of 600DPI. This means it can squeeze 600 dots of information into a linear inch at maximum, or that if you lay the smallest dots the printer can make side-by-side there will be this many in an inch (and none will overlap). At the same time LPI is made up of dot rows (that are different from the DPI dots). If the same 600DPI resolution printer prints with a 60 LPI screen, there will be 60 lines of dots that are 10x10 printer resolution dots in size (for a single color). Each dot in a line can then represent 100 shades of gray. (Um, this gets more complicated when you discuss printer half-steps and additional colors, so I'll skip, OK?)

If you followed and are clear to here, this may clarify why you get noticeably better results printing to an image setter (with 2540 DPI+). If you want to get 256 levels of gray in a print, you have to have dots that are 16x16 (printer dots): 16x16 = 256 (possible gray levels for EACH dot). With 2540 printer dots at your disposal, you can run up to 150 linescreen (158, really) and still get 256 levels of gray. To get 256 levels of gray on a 600 dpi printer, you have to run at about 38 LPI...which is a pretty big screening dot (most laser printers will default a bit higher than this, which limits the gray levels in output). You see there is a trade-off between getting more levels of gray and having a tighter screening (smaller screen dots); the only way to get the full gray-level depiction and shrink the screening dots is to have higher resolution in the printer (higher DPI).

To summarize: The pixels in the image are derived from samples (SPI) provide information to the image setter based on dimension (PPI) which is then essentially fitted to the screening frequency (LPI) and recorded as printer dots (DPI) for output as the result.

I hope that didn't prove more confusing than clarifying. If I muddied that up, please give me the opportunity to clarify.

RL
Reply With Quote top
  #14  
Old 02-04-2002, 01:31 PM
G. Couch's Avatar
G. Couch G. Couch is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 951
WOW!

I am going to have to read over this a couple of times...still a bit confused.
Reply With Quote top
  #15  
Old 02-04-2002, 01:32 PM
john_opitz john_opitz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Dallas/Ft.Worth,Texas
Posts: 230
Hello Mr. Lynch.

If anyone who is really into P.S., knows Mr. Lynch(the author) for "Special Edition using Adobe Photoshop 6".
It is nice to have the authors of the P.S. books to get involved more into the forums.
His web site here is for all P.S. 'ers, as well for the people who buy his book. But too dowmload the images for his book. Your going to need the password from the book.
Reply With Quote top
  #16  
Old 02-04-2002, 03:19 PM
Ed_L's Avatar
Ed_L Ed_L is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: northwest Indiana, about 45 minutes from Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,824
Hey Richard! Good to have you back! Thanks very much for the explanation, which will obviously need to be studied a little more by many of us.

Ed
Reply With Quote top
  #17  
Old 02-04-2002, 03:33 PM
DJ Dubovsky's Avatar
DJ Dubovsky DJ Dubovsky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Upper Penninsula of Michigan
Posts: 1,659
Ditto Ed's sentiments Richard. I too will have to read it several times to get the details worked out.

Also Thanks John for the link. I saved it to my files. I need all the info I can get on this subject as you can tell.
DJ
Reply With Quote top
  #18  
Old 02-06-2002, 06:04 AM
Ed_L's Avatar
Ed_L Ed_L is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: northwest Indiana, about 45 minutes from Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,824
Richard said:

"LPI can be adjusted.

So, say a printer has a resolution of 600DPI. This means it can squeeze 600 dots of information into a linear inch at maximum, or that if you lay the smallest dots the printer can make side-by-side there will be this many in an inch (and none will overlap). At the same time LPI is made up of dot rows (that are different from the DPI dots). If the same 600DPI resolution printer prints with a 60 LPI screen, there will be 60 lines of dots that are 10x10 printer resolution dots in size (for a single color). Each dot in a line can then represent 100 shades of gray. (Um, this gets more complicated when you discuss printer half-steps and additional colors, so I'll skip, OK?)"

Does anyone really understand everything Richard said? I'm trying to get it right in my head, but I want to start out right (before I get too deep into thought) so as not to confuse things. Tell me if my thinking on this part is correct or not: A higher resolution file at a fixed physical size for printing will result in a higher line frequency when the image is printed. Correct? And if that's the case, how is the maximum LPI determined?

Ed
Reply With Quote top
  #19  
Old 02-06-2002, 02:40 PM
Doug Nelson's Avatar
Doug Nelson Doug Nelson is offline
Janitor
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,068
Blog Entries: 21
LPI has nothing to do with inkjet printing. It refers to how fine a halftone screen will be applied before lithographic printing.
Reply With Quote top
  #20  
Old 02-06-2002, 03:17 PM
Ed_L's Avatar
Ed_L Ed_L is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: northwest Indiana, about 45 minutes from Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,824
Thanks Doug. I'll try to get my brain redirected!

Ed
Reply With Quote top
Reply

  RetouchPRO > Technique > Input/Output/Workflow


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Film scanner for home use? bodegg Hardware 12 05-20-2007 12:40 PM
Newbie printing question Doug Nelson Input/Output/Workflow 0 08-08-2001 12:30 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2016 Doug Nelson. All Rights Reserved