![]() |
| |||||||
| Input/Output/Workflow Scanning, printing, color management, and discussing best practices for control and repeatability |
| | Thread Tools |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Scanning negatives...need help! Heather |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Hi Heather C41 B/W uses color negative chemistry so shouldn't you be scanning as a color negative? Also, it's hard to address the difference you are seeing between an existing print and the scan. Your monitor may need calibrating or maybe it's just the difference in looking at 2 different light sources. Dave |
|
#3
| ||||
| ||||
| I'm pretty new to working with negatives myself, but the other day I scanned several negatives with an Epson 3170 Scanner. In the help file it said that if the negative wasn't placed top side face down you could get the orange glow that you mentioned. I scanned both as color and B/W negative with mixed results. I just picked the ones that looked that best. I definitely have a lot to learn and any input would be great. |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Is it possible that the scanner has an option allowing you to select B/W C-41 film, or maybe Ilford?? Ed |
|
#5
| ||||
| ||||
| A lot of labs (especially the good ones) will do colour correction and some exposure correction (automatically or individually, depending on how good and level of service) when printing your shots, while if you're scanning your own then you have to do your own colour and exposure correction too. Once you get used to the characteristics of the different film stocks you use it needn't be particularly onerous. Scanning your own negatives (as with producing your own prints in a traditional wet darkroom) is a good way to spot all the issues your shots have that are often covered up by a helpful lab (equally, you don't get a lab "correcting" an artistic effect that you were deliberately trying to create). I've never scanned C41 negatives but I actually scan all of my b&w negatives as colour anyway -- partly it gives a little extra information in the different channels which can be handy if there are tricky exposure details to be drawn out, but also it often produces interesting effects that I rather like. I can imagine that doing this for C41 would give you the colour cast you describe rather than the interesting effects I get from true b&w, but still I'd scan as a colour negative and then look at the various channels and use Channel Mixer, rather than Desaturate, to get to a grayscale image. It gives you more control and once you find settings that suit you you can record an action to do it automatically. |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Scanning Glass Negatives | Inspeqtor | Input/Output/Workflow | 12 | 05-02-2009 09:02 PM |
| Scanning B&W negatives | Ambrosie | History, Conservation, and Repair | 7 | 07-28-2006 10:26 AM |
| Scanning water-damaged negatives | kaulike | Input/Output/Workflow | 2 | 03-25-2005 04:12 AM |
| Scanning and Restoring damaged B/W negatives | LarryEvilsizer | Photo Restoration | 2 | 03-12-2005 12:55 PM |
| Scanning negatives PLEASE HELP | Marni | Input/Output/Workflow | 7 | 02-06-2004 04:31 AM |