Go Back   RetouchPRO > Business > Legal Issues
Register Blogs FAQ Site Nav Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Legal Issues Copyright, releases, likeness rights, licenses, etc.
NOT a replacement for professional council

copyright laws

Thread Tools
Old 06-11-2003, 01:52 PM
cinderella cinderella is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 154
copyright laws

HI, Looked over all the forums and chose this one to vent about my AM experience at WalMart. Took some photos I have been restoring to be printed and was informed that they could not sell them to me as they were copyrighted (sp?) . The young lady made a judgement call because there was a backdrop in the photo. When I got home I doublechecked and there is no copyright symbol of any kind on the photo.
Another one was a studio photo made in 1932 and I was told the photo was copyrighted and not 75 years old.
1. Wal mart should post these rules in large print all over the photo lab . When I asked to see the rules I was directed to the Kodak scan/print machine where they were taped to the cover. I was not using this machine.
2. Why should a backdrop construe copyright?

I do not wish to break copyright rules but there must be a more logical way to interpret them. Some photos are taken outdoors by professional photographers who might copyright. (Background rule does not apply)

Who do I contact at WM about there "rules" and their enforcement.

Sadly I must now print on my home printer and be concerned about archival paper and archival ink(which I can not afford)
And that brings up other questions which hopefullly I can find answers to in a different thread.

Does anyone know what the copyright laws are concerning photos???
Reply With Quote top
Old 06-11-2003, 03:31 PM
cinderella cinderella is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 154
Thanks, Read that and am still wondering. In both cases the people in the photo are deceased so would not be able to tell me who the photographer was. I am the caretaker of these family photos . There are no marks or identifying names on the photos to indicate who took them so I can ask for a release (photographers are probably deceased also)
Sometimes I have taken photos of people in front of "backdrops" i.e. my drapes. Should I consider these photos to be copyrighted now???? I think not.
Will search the web tonite.
Reply With Quote top
Old 06-11-2003, 05:03 PM
cinderella cinderella is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 154
I will check out that link tonite. Thanks. ( I can click around the web quickly in the middle of the nite.)
Reply With Quote top
Old 06-11-2003, 08:24 PM
G. Couch's Avatar
G. Couch G. Couch is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 951
cinderella, I moved this to the "Work" forum since it falls a bit more into the legal/business category.

I'm not sure I can answer your seems like a photo from 1932 would have become public domain by now with or without a copyright, but I am no expert.

In my own effort to avoid all things Walmart ...I would follow spinnnz's advice and have them printed elsewhere. Or, you could take them back to Walmart when the employee in question is not working!

Last edited by G. Couch; 06-11-2003 at 09:02 PM.
Reply With Quote top
Old 06-11-2003, 08:45 PM
Ed_L's Avatar
Ed_L Ed_L is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: northwest Indiana, about 45 minutes from Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,824
I'm certainly no expert on this subject either. But if there is no way possible to know where (by who) the original photograph was taken, and you have made a sincere effort to find out, I doubt very much if there's a court in the country that would find you liable for breaking copyright laws. If that's the case, I would find another processing lab. The fact that a backdrop was used does not necessarily make the image a commercially made image, any more than using a view camera makes it commercial. Of course anyone can have a copyright on an image, even uncle John Doe. Being ethical is the only thing you have to worry about in my opinion (which sometimes isn't very good).

Reply With Quote top
Old 06-11-2003, 09:43 PM
Mike Mike is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Grand Junction CO USA
Posts: 683
Ahh copyright!

As one who owns a portrait studio, bless those who will not copy our work . But that does not help you.

I would not jump to hard on Walmarts back for this, for they have been hit hard and often by all sorts of us screaming about protecting our copyrights. To the "highly trained photographic techs" they employ, a background drape means a studio, a studio means copyrighted, and a person trying to get them to reprint such an image may very well be a plant who will then turn it into a federal case costing the company many big $'s and them their job.

Some labs have a form they will ask you to sign, that will place any and all blame for a copyright infringment on you. If they do not you might suggest such a thing (offer to write it up?) and see what they say.

As a studio owner, I say great job by Walmart, as a person who has been in your shoes, bummer!

Reply With Quote top
Old 06-11-2003, 10:01 PM
cinderella cinderella is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 154
So Mike, How would I know your work is copyrighted.? Do you have an identifying logo or something on each print?
In my case there isn't anything on these old photos. So there is no way I can get a release . Your idea about "Some labs have a form they will ask you to sign, that will place any and all blame for a copyright infringment on you. If they do not you might suggest such a thing (offer to write it up?) and see what they say. " Is a good one but the overzealous person at WalMart is probably not in a position to handle this. If I can find out who the higher up person in charge of photo labs would be at WalMart I would be willing to discuss this with them. In the meantime WM has lost my business including grocery shopping. (which I do while waiting for photos)

I am so glad my thread was moved as I have read most of the other threads here about the copyright problem. And can see there is no easy solution.

Must get back to the NBA finals game. GO SPURS
Reply With Quote top
Old 06-11-2003, 10:43 PM
Mike Mike is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Grand Junction CO USA
Posts: 683

If I remember right, one does not have to place an actual mark on a print to claim copyright. All work is copyrighted by who ever produces the work. Of course there are all kinds of exceptions such as work for hire, etc. But the basic thing to remember is that the author of the work automaticily holds the copyright to the work. If you are trying to make a living by selling copies of it thats kind of important, if you are not making a living in that manner, then maybe not so important. The work does not have to be registered to be considered copyrighted (but it helps a lot to have it registered if you are sueing someone about infringing).

I would talk to the store manager, that person should have a whole better take of the problem than the clerk, or would know who you might be able to chat with to get your problem solved.

Some of these old laws (like the copyright is good for the lifetime of the author plus 75 years) can be a real pain. Common sense would seem to say go for it, no one is left to complain. I have never found too much room for common sense when talking with those who practice the law. Which leads me to ask, have you ever found anyone who ever got done practicing the law and did it for real? (come to think of it, doctors are in the same boat).

Reply With Quote top
Old 06-12-2003, 05:46 PM
Jim Conway's Avatar
Jim Conway Jim Conway is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oregon City, Oregon
Posts: 212
Lots of threads have covered this for one angle or another here but this one is not too difficult. If all you are trying to do is get something printed at a Walmart or Kinko's - just make up a form for a signed release from your customer stating that they own all rights and are giving you permission to do the work for them.

Perhaps that's not the type of thing I'd take to court but it should be enough to satisfy the people you are dealing with. After all, all they want to do is protect the store on their watch so your "proof" doesn't have to be a long legal document, just a signed release

And Mike, as far as old laws and common sense, it could be that the law makers got it right on this one! The basic idea is that if YOU didn't create it - somebody must have, so it's up to you to prove you have some rights in it rather than the other way around. From the creators side, copyright notices are not necessary but they will help in court (if you end up there) to at least show that you were trying to protect your work.

Hope some of this is helpful.

Jim Conway
Reply With Quote top
Old 06-12-2003, 08:29 PM
Jakaleena's Avatar
Jakaleena Jakaleena is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 709
Well, I thought I'd chime in on this one since I am a Wal-Mart Photo Center Manager....

(Oh, great - now Greg's going to avoid me....)

Federal copyright laws protect all intellectual creations from the moment of their creation whether they are stamped or not and no matter whether they are registered or not.

Our basic mission at Wal-Mart with respect to this issue is to protect the photographer and obey Federal Copyright Laws. If anyone could go and have a portrait done, purchase one copy, and then go to Wal-Mart and have inexpensive copies made, photographers would soon go out of business. Most photographers make the bulk of their profit on print sales, not sitting fees.

If it appears to be a professional photograph, we are not allowed to copy it in any way without a written copyright release from the photographer (unless it is more than 75 years old, in which case it will pass into public domain).

This is the issue I get the most grief over, and the one people are the least understanding about. Believe me, they get furious over this one. I've been threatened, cursed at, called names, and even had one woman grab the phone from my counter and start calling her lawyer...

On this issue, at work, I am completely inflexible and I also expect everyone working for me to be. The first reason is that Wal-Mart is one of the most sued companies over violation of Federal Copyright Law. The second reason is that if any one of us violate this policy, we can be terminated. If anyone working for me violates this, I am obligated to suspend them for a day at the very least, and possibly terminate them depending on the circumstances.

Jim is correct. A written statement from your customer stating that they are the copyright owner and that you have permission to do the work will probably work since it puts the responsibility onto your customer if any question arises. If we copy or print a professional photograph, we're required to keep these written releases on file for 5 years.

Another solution is to contact the PPA (Professional Photographers of America). They have an entire division dedicated to helping people track down photographers and obtain copyright releases.

If you want to contact someone higher up at Wal-Mart, the number is 1-800-Wal-Mart. But in my experience, since it's based on Federal Law, this policy is backed up by upper management no matter how high up you go. Also, the Store Manager doesn't have the final authority on this within the store. That decision falls to the Photo Center Manager (me). I am required to make sure that all store management understands and follows this policy.

Although admittedly a lot of Wal-Mart employees are not rocket scientists, many of us are not completely brain dead either... I have been working in the photography field for a long time, both as a photographer and as a photo lab technician/manager. Most of my experience is with high end professional photographers. I can usually look at a photograph (the lighting, the composition, the posing, etc.) and make a very accurate educated guess as to whether it is a professional photograph or not - with or without a backdrop. And, if there is a question in my mind or any of my employees minds whether is is a snapshot or a pro shot, we will err on the side of caution and decline to copy or print it without a release.

I know this often makes us VERY unpopular, but it is a rule we have no choice but to live with and obey if we want to continue to be employed....

Last edited by Jakaleena; 06-12-2003 at 08:41 PM.
Reply With Quote top

  RetouchPRO > Business > Legal Issues

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Copyright Duv Legal Issues 17 09-27-2007 08:33 PM
Copyright again bcarll Legal Issues 3 12-10-2006 11:03 PM
Another interesting Copyright question TheTexan Legal Issues 4 09-03-2002 08:14 PM
Copyright free images d_kendal Legal Issues 8 05-22-2002 06:38 PM
Non-work related copyright Ed_L Legal Issues 2 04-29-2002 06:02 PM

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2016 Doug Nelson. All Rights Reserved