| Notices | Welcome to RetouchPRO . You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload images and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. | | Photo Compositing Collage, montage, masking, selections, combining, etc. | 
02-10-2006, 03:32 AM
|  | Moderator Patron | | Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Milan, Italy
Posts: 2,058
| | | Gary,
...any luck in downloading the pictures?
No problems here, but sometimes it happens to me too .... In these cases, I 'force' a total reload of the page (with Netscape is Crtl+Shift+R) and it ususally works ... | 
02-10-2006, 01:47 PM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Toronto
Posts: 6
| | | A target reference Hi everyone,
I've observed discussions on RetouchPRO for a while now. I've never had anything to contribute that hasn't already been mentioned by others in each thread until now. This isn't original but I think it's a good reminder:
Pure, try to refer to a similar image; give yourself a target. Look for a model shot against a black background and lit in a similar fashion. It's so obvious to consider (and accordingly, very easy to forget when you're in a pinch,) but it's impossible to undervalue how an ideal picture gives you a goal to aim for in your retouching. You'll know what doesn't look real because you'll have a concrete example for comparison. You won't need to rely on imagination or vague memory.
We're all sensitive to human features that "just don't look right." We can all keep working through trial and error to make our retouching look better. Of course it's best to know exactly what we're aiming for when we need to maintain realism.
I hope this helps. And Pure, I hope you come up with the result you need in time! Good luck! PS. The RetouchPRO community is full of genius! I've learned a lot. Thanks to the mods and all the contributors. I hope to be a part of more discussions in the future. | 
02-10-2006, 03:06 PM
| | Senior Member Patron | | Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,083
| | | Hi Pure,
There is no visible loss in converting to LAB and back. Mathematically there may be a tiny quantizing error but it is not noticeable.
Regards, Murray | 
02-10-2006, 03:20 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: May 2004 Location: Goiânia, Brazil
Posts: 1,549
| | Hi there, Rydiant! Welcome to RetouchPRO
You quite right of course.
Sometimes we get so carried away with the intricacies of channel blending that we forget to look where we're going - good reality check!
Rô | 
02-10-2006, 03:32 PM
|  | Moderator Patron | | Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Milan, Italy
Posts: 2,058
| | Hi Rydiant!
Welcome to RP from me too!!
Thank you so much for the great tip!!! As Rô said, we tend to get 'carried away' ... so, it's a brilliant idea to keep an image of reality for quick comparison!! | 
02-10-2006, 03:57 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 472
| | | I think we all agree this is one of those pathalogical cases you'd want to avoid at all costs.
For future reference, the best choice is to shoot with a background and lighting of similar color to the final desired result. Russel Brown's techniques work best in this situation.
If you don't know what the final background will look like or if you just want more flexibility to have a general image that you can cleanly extract for an arbitrary number of possible scenarios (ie aribrarily changed background and arbitrarily changed hair highlights) it's best to ensure that every light source has a distinct color--the more saturated the better. So, for example, if the background had been saturated dark red and the hair-highlight had been light saturated green (the third light source is what is coming from front of the subject--in this case it's the yellow of the hair), you could more easily (and smoothly) separate the three light sources and adjust them as desired in the final image.
Bart | 
02-10-2006, 04:07 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: somewhere over there
Posts: 6,730
| | oh lord, another bad hair day
has anyone tried the vertus software on this yet? i'd be real curious to see how that works.
craig | 
02-10-2006, 04:11 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Orizaba, México
Posts: 114
| | | Ok non of the 2 ways that Russell Brown shows in his videos are usefull for this, well, not as a "GOOD RESULT"
I'm a little stuck, but after the meal I was wondering about something, I'll give a try.
Do you know pure that you put all of us to work?
LOL
Ok, Now I edited my post to attach my try, please tell me if you think it's some how reallistic and I'll tell you my process
Check most on the upper side of the pic, I wasn't putting attention to the lower part, but the method works for bought
Last edited by studioj; 02-10-2006 at 04:29 PM.
Reason: Adding the pic
| 
02-10-2006, 04:41 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Europe, Germany
Posts: 188
| | studioj, your pic is very good.
unfortunately i didnt have enough time to experiment today,
but i found my own way of doing it and mixed everything a bit together from your approaches and the videos one.
alltogether i like the result, it took me the whole day, but i have to continue with 10 more and i must leave it now, until the client says "no" or "yes".
of course its not as precise as all of yours, its just done in a flush or hurry and finished "moody" as for the atmosphere and lightmood, for my own point of view.
here it is: unretouched/retouched http://homepage.mac.com/purepeter/Si...de_onwhite.jpg http://homepage.mac.com/purepeter/Si...nd_onblack.jpg
thanks for your help again, i cannot say how much you all helped me today.
i was nearly close to heartattack, to say it ironically.
Last edited by pure; 02-10-2006 at 04:48 PM.
| 
02-10-2006, 04:59 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Orizaba, México
Posts: 114
| |  I like the final result, I like the model too
It's not what you where looking at the beginning, but the result it's good for my point of view | 
02-10-2006, 04:59 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 472
| | Looks good. Please tell us how.
Bart | 
02-10-2006, 05:07 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2006 Location: Europe, Germany
Posts: 188
| | thanks
extracted the hair and body with the video method (i think it was colormixer)
then i had a channel with a nice mask, actually 2 as for body and hair, like described in the video above.
applying the mask and cleaning it, erasing everything light and medium light in the hair.
finally copied original hair as layer over the masked layer and erased everything which i didnt need. then pressed invert (i), then applied several curves for the second hair layer and applied another layer as luminosity filled with light orange airbrush over the hair peaces which went light-grey as i inverted it. then the invertlayer looks like a mix between red/blonde against black background. hope this works also for next 10 images.
thanks | 
02-10-2006, 05:18 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Orizaba, México
Posts: 114
| | | Mine was the most simple of all of you. I used the old REPLACE COLOR option in the menu IMAGE/ADJUST/REPLACE COLOR
I used 20% tolerance and click on the upper background color, and I decrease the luminosity only in 15%.
I did this like 6 times and then, I had a very nice contrast in the background and the hair. Then, use color burn tool (O) on the edge of the hair and a hard black brush on the rest of the background.
REPLACE COLOR worked perfectly, more than LAB color and the other methods | 
02-10-2006, 05:37 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 2,709
| | | Hi Flora, sorry I'm a bit late coming back. Tried just now and it opened fine, just some kind of temp glitch I suppose.
Thanks for the suggestion, will try it next time I have such a problem.
Gary | 
02-10-2006, 07:38 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Lancashire (UK)
Posts: 1,112
| | | Hi Pure.
You Say you ‘unfortunately I have to set them all in front of a white background’
I don’t know whose fault this was but it sounds like the instructions were not that clear. As a photographer without clear instruction then I would have added a backlight or hair light. Another Way.
Why not extract the body but leave a snoot on the background. This is what I would have done when taking the shots.
This means you can have a black background without any hair extraction, which will look more natural.
Ken |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:44 AM. | |
|