RetouchPRO

Go Back   RetouchPRO > Technique > Photo Restoration

Notices

Photo Restoration Repairing damaged photos

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 05-09-2005, 03:14 AM
deadants's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Port Stephens, NSW, Australia
Posts: 184
Pixelated 300ppi scan

Here is a photo that was posted on the rootschat forum. It seems to be pixelated even though it was scanned at 300ppi. Does anyone have any ideas on how this could happen. The poster says it's a copy of the original but the copy was made years ago. Here's a link to the photo on the forum.
http://www.rootschat.com/forum/index...html#msg219789

Here's a link to download it.
http://tinyurl.com/73tmj
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-09-2005, 03:36 AM
Caitlin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 494
The problem is that though they may have scanned it a 300ppi (or 600) they have - as the file name says - "resized" it. I'm guessing considering the very small file size is that they have used a highly lossy jpg setting - ie extremely compressed.

They are probably getting resized mixed up with compressed, as the image seems to still be the original size, and still 300dpi. I don't know what the maximum file size in on that forum, but I'd suggest she goes back to her original scan , and resaves it as a jpg with a max compression of 70.

Last edited by Caitlin; 05-09-2005 at 03:42 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-09-2005, 03:44 AM
deadants's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Port Stephens, NSW, Australia
Posts: 184
Hi Caitlin,
The max size you can post on rootschat is 300Kb. I will pass on your suggestion. Hopefully she can figure it out. I have attempted to walk her through the process but she keeps making the same error.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-09-2005, 04:07 AM
Caitlin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 494
Deadants, I see they are using Irfanview. Attached is a screenshot that could help them figure out where to set the compression level. Bigger number = better!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Clipboard01.jpg (99.4 KB, 19 views)

Last edited by Caitlin; 05-09-2005 at 05:43 AM. Reason: Fixed typo!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-09-2005, 05:30 AM
Flora's Avatar
Moderator
Patron
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Milan, Italy
Posts: 2,058
Blog Entries: 3
Hi,

Caitlin is absolutely right on this .... indipendently from the scanning resolution, the images posted are very small/compressed: only 56 and 54 KB so, no wonder all you can see is 'blocks' !!!!!

I do hope that you manage to get a better sized picture .... since, for what I could see, the image isn't damaged and you could get a very nice restoration!!!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-09-2005, 04:53 PM
deadants's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Port Stephens, NSW, Australia
Posts: 184
Thanks Caitlan,
I have just sent an email with your attachment to Pauline, the owner of the picture. Hopefully she will sort it out. As Flora points out that it should restore quite nicely.

deadants
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-17-2005, 08:00 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toledo
Posts: 141
Do you mean when I saved a picture and where it says image quality (small file to larger file)? I have 6.0 by the way. I don't see where you can compress it at. I'm new to all of this.

Jen
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-17-2005, 09:48 PM
Caitlin's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 494
The compression setting is that 'quality' setting. 6 is pretty mediocre - though acceptable for straight web publishing. You will run into problems fast though if you then want to edit that image. If you are using photoshop the best thing to do if posting to this newsgroup is use 'save for web' - that way you can look at the file size and modify the compression (quality level) to get the least compression for your 100kb limit. You can also modifty the image dimensions there to reduce the file size - without modifying your main file.

If you can you should try to save things with higher quality aka less compression - so more like an 8 setting (or better if possible!) The more compression the more compression artifacts will appear, and each time the image is opened and resaved these are compounded and become even more noticable
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-17-2005, 10:07 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Toledo
Posts: 141
Thanks that clears alot up for me.

Jen
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiReddit! Float This Post!Stumble this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Live Bookmark this Post!Share this post on Facebook
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone know if this is a false positive? Kraellin Software 42 07-09-2007 09:25 PM
Pixelated Celebrities Game Doug Nelson Salon 617 03-02-2007 05:35 PM
Gary - I need your help please! Syd Hardware 36 02-12-2007 11:43 AM
Scan Problem, Image on Silk Finish Paper Jim Frazer Photo Restoration 13 11-03-2006 12:44 PM
Scan photos or negatives? Shoff Input/Output/Workflow 4 08-16-2004 01:43 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2008 Doug Nelson. All Rights Reserved




1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51