![]() |
|
#1
| ||||
| ||||
| how could they do this? Hi, I followed the Katrin's link to this site http://www.archivesphotorestoration....examples.html# just can't believe my eyes that they can fix a photo like this. I attached the photos they made. It is really amazing. |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Hi realaqu, I was really curious to see how this 'miracle' was performed .... I think that the 'secret' is in the 'preparation' and Tools/negatives etc. available .... Quote:
|
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Flora's right -- they must have had a better original to work with. I had a go at unblurring with the Unshake program (see http://www.hamangia.freeserve.co.uk/), which can to a limited extent recover "lost" detail, and then doing the usual color adjusting and so on. This is OK-ish but the results just don't have the smooth continuous tones of their retouched image, which I am sure must have come from a higher resoultion source (or they have an amazing artist who paints in all the details |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Some look like Levels while eyeballing the histograms (Marylin). For the colour cast one (guy on ladder), looks like Steve's technique: Intro to Curves - Page Three. Then other touches as needed. If you are PC/Win, I recommend trying Colour 2 Colour a shot. Hm... Just tried C2C with the guy in the chair. After C2C, was able to get awlfully close the retouched example with a Lum tug. edit: LOL Chopping! Love it. Last edited by Stroker; 05-15-2005 at 12:21 PM. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Is it me or does the image of Cary Grant have more than the usual Cyan in it? k |
|
#7
| ||||
| ||||
| i was thinking the same thing, either too much cyan or green. and yes, the res is pretty low compared to what they were working with. i did a little reading on that site. that's pretty impressive what they're doing and using, and working with HP directly to develop new technology for r & r. nice. i also gave this one a shot. a simple sharpen more and contrast does a lot to help, but i went quite a bit further, using a lot of different filters and techniques (a lot of which i've learned on this site). i eventually would up with this: K. |
|
#8
| ||||
| ||||
| Ok, I had to try ..... I think I got good results, still avoiding haloes etc., with size and resolution available .... but, in my opinion, still a far cry from the clear full details they got with .... (repeating myself) ... a far higher resolution to work on .... |
|
#9
| ||||
| ||||
| yup, ya did great, flora. i like your skin tones over my own. a bit too much red in mine, i think. i like tzec's also. gonna have to work on my skin tones. if they were using 4000 - 8000 dpi, i can only wonder at their file sizes off a scan like that. and editing a file that large must be a bit interesting also. i can see why they need dual processing macs. you could use one of those wall-sized monitor arrays and still not get a 1 : 1 image showing K. |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| Wow, Flora Wonderful work. you set the standard for me. I ll try it again tonight realaqu |
| Thread Tools | |
| |