Hi Isaac, Like you, I find the filters in
PS seem to apply a fixed algoritm and have limited and flexibility. I prefer the Noise Ninja interface over Neat Image. I work with very high resolution 16 bit images and find Noise Ninja gives me slightly better results and is faster. However if you ask 100 people, you may get 50 preferences for NI.
Other comments I have regarding these are:
- There is a demo version of Ninja (
www.picturecode.com). It is fully functional but the demo version places a grid of lines on the output image so it is really for eval purposes only.
- Both NI and NN are sold as stand alone programs and plugins. I prefer to have a plugin so that the filter is fully integrated into
PS. I don't have time to open in one, filter, save, then open in
PS.
- Both NN and NJ are sold in 3 versions. Here is where the marketing comes in.
As you go from the basic to the intermediate to the pro version, you get more features and there are about $10 more as you go up. So for example the pro version of Noise Ninja lets you use it as a stand alone program and as a plugin. You get the ability to work on high res images and save in more file formats. The s/w producers have a comparison list on their web sites that list all of the features with each version.
It sounds like an intelligent noise filter is a must for your work flow as well so it is probably a good investment for under $100.
Regards,
Murray