Hi Candice,
whenever you do something for
yourself, I think it's only a matter of personal taste ... If 10 people will post here, you might get 10 (or more) different interpretations ... tons of very good tips and suggestions about what you could try to make your picture look better ... but, at the end, as long as
you like it .. it's just perfect!
That said, here is my opinion ...although it's difficult to say anything without the comparison with the original... from my 'restoration' point of view, your picture looks really nice and clean ...

... Part of he whites contain no details, but that could have been so already in the original ....
From my 'colorizing' point of view, I'm sure you captured his complexion very well and I take you left the background B&W on purpose. But some parts haven't been coloured accurately (his hands, the lower right (his right) part of his neck...) or not coloured at all... (his hair..)... The colours are nice and soft ... but a bit 'flat'...
In my opinion, the colorizing procedure must be very, very accurate and exact independently from the very personal choice of colours...
Here are a few of
Vikki's excellent tips on colorizing.
Hope this helps...
P.S. Quote:
|
Originally Posted by klassylady25 RP says that I have posted it before and I did but removed it but RP won't let me place it on here again |
...Happened to me too once ... If I remember right, logging off
RP and then on again had taken care of the problem and I could upload my picture ... otherwise you can always rename the image and try again...