| Notices | Welcome to RetouchPRO . You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload images and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. | | Photo Restoration Repairing damaged photos | 
11-13-2003, 08:41 AM
| | Member | | Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 51
| | | high pass sharpening I have read of a method of sharpening known as "high pass sharpening". Technique is:
1.Duplicate_Base layer (if needed unlock first) apply High Pass Filter found under Filters/Other
2.Apply a Radius value of around 10.0
3.Change the Mode from Normal to Hard Light.
4.Move opacity slider to 10 - 25% normally.
More information on high pass sharpening is available.
My question: On first glance, this seems to be a much more straightforward and effective method than using UnSharpMask. Do the pros on this forum agree that HPS is a good replacement for USM for "general" sharpening? | 
11-13-2003, 09:43 AM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: London, UK
Posts: 518
| | camner,
Not strictly speaking answering your question, but while you're looking at sharpening techniques you may also want to look at the "smart sharpening" technique which was discussed in this forum thread. | 
11-13-2003, 12:18 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Metro Phoenix area, Arizona
Posts: 2,640
| | Bruce Fraser, author of several well-known Photoshop books, has recently written a new article on the topic of sharpening -- Bruce Fraser's article at Creativepro.com
Bruce Fraser offers his latest thoughts about when and how to sharpen -- Quote: |
Since we sharpen for three very different reasons, why not split the sharpening into three separate stages: one close to capture, one in the creative phase, and one round of sharpening tailored specifically for the final output?
| Mr. Fraser makes use of Unsharp Mask, edge masking, luminous blend mode, Blend IF, as well as High Pass sharpening -- and suggests when and how to use each. Food for thought. | 
11-13-2003, 04:32 PM
|  | Junior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 16
| | | Camner,
I found out about this technique several weeks ago, and find it very useful. It is also worth looking at the soft light blend option, as I find hard light can be a bit harsh. | 
11-13-2003, 06:12 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia
Posts: 1,213
| | | CJ
Food for thought? I think I'll be feasting on this for a few weeks at least. Just did a read through and it looks very interesting. Seems though it is a lot of work. Especially if you are into high volume. Have you tried his technique? Results?
Duv | 
11-13-2003, 07:17 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Metro Phoenix area, Arizona
Posts: 2,640
| | Quote: |
Seems though it is a lot of work. Especially if you are into high volume. Have you tried his technique? Results?
| Haven't tried his whole workflow -- it's new thinking for him, as you'll see when you get time to digest the article. He has a link to his previous workflow which was somewhat different.
I'm not into high volume, but it would likely be possible to write actions for the initial sharpening and the output sharpening - different actions for different output devices -- but always allowing for, and requiring some tweaking. The middle section - his so-called "creative sharpening" would require individual attention at all times as far as I understand it.
If the results are apparent, then the time spent would be well spent, would it not? If the work is paid work, and the workflow creates a better image result, then it would be part of the cost of doing business. I'm SAYING IF -- since I don't know, but I plan on giving it a try. | 
11-13-2003, 10:05 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Nanaimo, British Columbia
Posts: 1,213
| | | Thank you CJ. My learning curve is steeper than yours. Perhaps as we both learn more we'll touch base again.
Duv | 
11-14-2003, 09:05 AM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: Metro Phoenix area, Arizona
Posts: 2,640
| | Duv,
I didn't say I was going to do it RIGHT; I said I was going to give it a try.
We're all at some point in the learning curve, and I sure have learned a lot since I joined here -- one of the things that I learned was how much more there is to learn... But that's part of the joy of learning Photoshop -- not going to get bored. | 
11-22-2003, 10:13 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Derbyshire England
Posts: 1
| | | Highpass Shatpening I use highpass a lot. Particularly in landscapes.
I made an action for it, which I find very useful as all I now have to do is to adjust the final opacity. |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:33 PM. | |
|