| Notices | Welcome to RetouchPRO . You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload images and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. | | Photo Retouching "Improving" photos, post-production, correction, etc. | 
09-15-2005, 11:44 AM
|  | Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: netherlands
Posts: 65
| | | need help in retouch slide scan i have a pro scan of an old halfsize 35 mm colour slide
it needs help badly, who can help / advise ?
thanks in advance
bert | 
09-15-2005, 03:59 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Gatineau, QC Canada
Posts: 315
| | | Hi Bert
There are only hints of her hair and of the pattern in the scarf. There must be even more detail hidden in the slide. You could maybe photograph the projected slide and combine exposures optimized for highlights and shadows.
Pierre
P.S: I've added a second (I hope better) version.
Last edited by Panpan; 09-15-2005 at 06:05 PM.
| 
09-15-2005, 07:07 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 325
| | | panpan, no offense, but that doesn't look so good.
You overly smoothed the heck out of her face, she looks like pudding face or something.
contrast is a bit much.
anyway, heres my quick attempt
there is next to nothing in her hair in terms of detail...but as pan pan said, you are going to need two exposures, one for the shadows and one for the highlights and combine them | 
09-16-2005, 03:22 AM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Gatineau, QC Canada
Posts: 315
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Photo678 panpan, no offense, but that doesn't look so good.
You overly smoothed the heck out of her face, she looks like pudding face or something.
contrast is a bit much. | Thank you for the feedback. I'm sorry you didn't like them. I thought I had done better with the second one.
Pierre | 
09-16-2005, 03:58 AM
|  | Junior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 12
| | Hi.bert de wolff  | 
09-16-2005, 03:17 PM
|  | Senior Member Patron | | Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Seabrook Island, SC
Posts: 868
| | | High Contrast, Dark Well this required a lot of painting. I copied the layer in Screen mode and with a brush lightened around the eyes etc. One probably needs to spend a lot of time with this photo to restore it properly. | 
09-17-2005, 01:45 AM
|  | Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: netherlands
Posts: 65
| | | lots of thanks hi PHTO678, PANPAN, ADONG and PHILBACH fthanks a lot for all your great contributions!
it's a difficult one this indeed. the only slight hair detail is in the blue channel but sofar i haven't been able to make it come out in a natural way.
however we'll keep on trying
thanks again for your help sofar
bert | 
09-17-2005, 02:07 AM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 494
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by bert de wolff i have a pro scan of an old halfsize 35 mm colour slide
it needs help badly, | Bert, what scanner are you using? I would expect a better image result from a slide. | 
09-17-2005, 10:12 AM
|  | Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: netherlands
Posts: 65
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by Caitlin Bert, what scanner are you using? I would expect a better image result from a slide. | hi caitlin
i had the scan done by a local pro
from the metadata i see it was done on a Nikon Coolscan V ED
remember it's a 25 year old colour slide in halfsize 35 mm format (forget the original format name, Olympus had these Pen EE models then)
rgds
bert | 
09-17-2005, 12:49 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 325
| | | ahhhh half frame camera...very old skool... | 
09-17-2005, 01:52 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 113
| | | Here is my effort.
1. Selective color adj layer, balanced mid gray point on collar to neutral. Face lookd bad.
2. On adj layer painted face with black brush to restore face to original. Too much. About half way would be closer to good skin tones. So Alt click on adj ayer mask to make it visible. Color selection of the blacks and fill selection with 50% gray. Now some of the color adjustment from the adj layer show through. Looks better, but still not there.
3. Another Selective color adj layer on top of stack. Adjust color for face, jacket and background will go off color. Copy mask from first adj. layer to new adj layer. Invert mask. background is restored but color of new adj layer remains.
Almost happy with color. Will fix localized tones latter.
4. Eyes look bad. Make 50% new layer for dodging and burning. Low opacity white brush to lighten up areas around eyes. Color really shifts badly on worked areas, don't worry about it now, can be fixed easily latter. Made layer set and put these layers in it. Made new merged layer from set, having only set visible, ctl-shft-alt-N-E (whew!).
5. Copied the new layer once more by dragging to new layer icon at bottom. Healing brush to clean up under eyes. Overdo it a little. It will look plastic and unnatural. When done, lower opacity and let original of copy layer underneath show through. About 44% looked good. Eyes look much better and more natural now.
6.? Don't remember but I think the eyes still looked to dark so I made another new merged copy layer of the top two layers and then another 50% dodge/burn layer. Painted with white to lighten eyes.
7. Merged last copy layer and D/B layer. Going to work on the local discolored areas. Set brush to color, 10%. Select a good, normal skin color, light mid tone that is near the area you want to correct. While in brush mode, hold down the Alt key and the color picker comes up. Bush over the discolored areas. Build up, the bad color will start to disappear and merge with your selected color. Do this with the various discolored areas, sample new for each area that is in a different color zone.
Took longer to write this than do the steps.
Larry | 
09-17-2005, 10:11 PM
| | Senior Member Patron | | Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Australia
Posts: 1,079
| | | Larry looks very natural.
I thought I'd have a go at this, as my main bug was the missing hairline. Dont recall all that I did other than I created a new layer and wound the brightness and contrast right up to pick out the hairline and then slightly dodged around the background of it before overlaying with a very small opacity. | 
09-18-2005, 01:08 AM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 584
| | Hi, just thought I would throw this in because no one else has really followed this thought process ... I did not retouch the face as that was not the point of this thread ...
-new layer, inserted red channel and set to luminosity blend mode, flattened
-Control-Alt-~ to select highlights
-Control-Shift-I to invert selection
-Control-J to copy selcted shadows to new layer, set blend mode to screen
-Control-J a bunch of times to dup this layer to lighten hair
-Duped background layer and merged hair lightening layers with this dup, masked to just effect hair
Hope this helps,
Roger
Last edited by roger_ele; 09-18-2005 at 01:14 AM.
| 
09-18-2005, 10:42 AM
|  | Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: netherlands
Posts: 65
| | | larry, cass and roger,
many thanks for the workflows of your different approaches, will put them to work on my original
many thanks again
bert |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:44 PM. | |
|