Quote:
|
Originally Posted by annacarina hi and thanks. Nice to be with you. But why cmyk colors. Can the corrections be made in RGB. ive downloaded some videotutorials from Radiantvista by Mark Johnson and he uses RGB values from exactly K.Eismann when he is correcting for skin colors. Whats the big differece between doing them in cmyk vs. RGB. Thanks |
Yes, RGB values can certainly be used, and RGB can roughly be treated like CMY in terms of the actual color moves. However, I find it far more intuitive to set my info palette to CMYK regardless of the actual color space, for a couple of reasons.
One is purely personal: I learned color back in the days when CMYK was king and most image work was destined for a press of one sort or another. I think more clearly in CMYK. But that's not a bad thing, particularly with skin tones. Because the black values are siphoned off into their own channel, the CMY readouts are far more precise in terms of the actual color. As Flora pointed out, black values shouldn't really figure into skin tones except in heavy shadows and extremely dark African-American tones. Also, it's easier to conceptualize CMYK values as percentages based on a scale of 0 - 100 as opposed to RGB's 0 - 255. When you think "Okay, magenta's reading 53%, and I want Cyan to come in around 20% of that," the math works in a straightforward manner and the Cyan value really will be lower (somewhere around 9-15%). It makes sense.
It's trickier to think in RGB. You can mentally substitute Green for Magenta, but if you read a value of 189 - G, your Red channel (comparable to Cyan) will be larger, not smaller. There's nothing to say you can't train yourself to think in that manner, and I've known many people who have been exposed only to web work who find CMYK arcane and impenitrable. But I think the argument for using CMYK values can be extended beyond mere preference and "It's what you learned."