Glamour retouch!

ruud92 · #1 01-02-2007, 08:30 AM

(this tread was also in Critiques under the name: Glamour, First Attempt, im sorry if i make people angry about it??)

ORIGINAL IMAGE!(before)

its a Beauty make over, i give her a more female jaw, a smaller nose, bigger eyes, longer eye lashes, fuller lips, make her lips more symmetrical, perfect skin (so far is possible) and some other little things..

How would you do it?

lets me know what you think! thanks

Ruud

click here for the Retoucht image! (high resolution)

Smokie · #2 01-02-2007, 05:01 PM

Not bad dude.

Cross · #3 01-02-2007, 08:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Peano

Nice work! 50 people will give 50 variations. Here's mine.

Heres Mine, a little too soft.

Ant · #4 01-03-2007, 07:35 PM

comments:

COLOR everywhere, it's a mess
EYELASHES - too long, not real looking
HAIR - huge mess, including eyebrows.
LIPS - cmon now..
Neck lines - simplify
SKIN - blur fest
EARPIERCING - always remove hole if no earrings on

Overall - attention to details. Don't remove information - good. Add information that isn't in the original.

ruud92 · #5 01-04-2007, 03:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ant

comments:

COLOR everywhere, it's a mess
EYELASHES - too long, not real looking
HAIR - huge mess, including eyebrows.
LIPS - cmon now..
Neck lines - simplify
SKIN - blur fest
EARPIERCING - always remove hole if no earrings on

Overall - attention to details. Don't remove information - good. Add information that isn't in the original.

Okey thanks for the information. I will do something with it, but it is Glamour so what you say about 'EYELASHES - too long, not real looking' its glamour you know and thats just normal then so long eyelashes, and the color is did nothing with it, 'HAIR - huge mess, including eyebrows.' i dont do anything with it as only I burn the eyebrows a little bit. but thanks for the res of the information

Ruud

Ant · #6 01-04-2007, 08:06 AM

well then in your definition 'glamour' isn't even retouching - just illustration.

edit: in your opinion, is an ad for Maybelline 'glamour' retouched or is glamour only reserved for the Sears portraits?

Ant · #7 01-04-2007, 08:33 AM

Because I'm busy on an ad and don't wish to waste my time..

Lasa · #8 01-04-2007, 08:49 AM

Wow, ant, it must be great being you..keep up the good work.
Lasa

Cassidy · #9 01-04-2007, 09:48 AM

My feeble attempt

ruud92 · #10 01-04-2007, 10:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ant

well then in your definition 'glamour' isn't even retouching - just illustration.

edit: in your opinion, is an ad for Maybelline 'glamour' retouched or is glamour only reserved for the Sears portraits?

pff, im just 14 years old that you know that, and im maybe not so good as you are, but you can also be nice and say what good is our what better can, you know and not the retoucht image ¿yelling out? 'afzeiken' (netherlands worth, i dont know the enlisch worth for it.)
so thanks.

ruud92 · #11 01-04-2007, 10:37 AM

Thanks Cassidy for the reply!

Cassidy · #12 01-04-2007, 10:39 AM

sorry ruud, not meant as a reply, only meant as an adjunct

ruud92 · #13 01-04-2007, 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassidy

sorry ruud, not meant as a reply, only meant as an adjunct

yeah okey, but i dont knew how you call that

Cassidy · #14 01-04-2007, 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ruud92

yeah okey, but i dont knew how you call that

call me soft and pliable )

ruud92 · #15 01-04-2007, 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cassidy

call me soft and pliable )

im sorry for my bad englisch i have dyslexie so im not so good in it and im netherlands.. so haha, ik dont really understand what you say now