| Notices | Welcome to RetouchPRO . You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload images and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. | | Photo Retouching "Improving" photos, post-production, correction, etc. | 
09-06-2007, 02:34 AM
| | Member | | Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 60
| | | Re: The demystification of dave hill! let's all help! I used 2 flashes in photography to get every detail.
The most important thing is the photography.
Rest i did with dodge and burn and unsharp mask
lg Calvin | 
09-09-2007, 11:13 AM
|  | Junior Member | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Guisborough, England
Posts: 14
| | | Re: The demystification of dave hill! let's all help! | 
09-09-2007, 11:15 AM
| | Member | | Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Mannheim, Germany
Posts: 53
| | | Re: The demystification of dave hill! let's all help! i like the style very much. what did you do, funkyboy? | 
09-09-2007, 11:45 AM
|  | Junior Member | | Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Guisborough, England
Posts: 14
| | | Re: The demystification of dave hill! let's all help! Eyes
I burned the pupils to make them darker and then i went round the iris wih dodge making them lighter. Background
For the background i used some channels to make a mask then inverted it, using a gradient fill to make the red darker. I also lowered the opacity to blend it in but you can choose which background you want. Heres a link to the channel masking if it helps, give it time to load it takes ages its very tempromental- http://av.adobe.com/russellbrown/AdvancedMasking.mov Skin
The skin is quite easy once you get the hang of it read this - http://www.photoshoptutorials.ws/pho...ooth-skin.html
Its a big read but its worth it in the end, i also lowered the saturation to make the skin slightly desaturated Teeth
All i did for the teeth was cut it from another tooth and placed it in the gaps lowering the opacity and making a new layer painting the teeth white and putting the layer in soft light and lowering the opacity Hair
I used hue and saturation and went into the yellow channel and lowering the saturation, using the clone tool i alo got rid of stray hairs Lips
I dodged the lip highlights and made a new layer painted the lips pink put the layer in soft light and lowered the opacity
Hope this all helps if you want to know anything else just message me | 
09-09-2007, 12:08 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 316
| | | Re: The demystification of dave hill! let's all help! Variations of this smoothing technique are all over the place. I'm not fond of the version you referenced, for a number of reasons. However the most important is that the best decription of how it works is right here in the RetouchPro tutorials section. Two articles byRo go into far greater depth, offer a much more useful set of parameters and provide a workflow flexible enough to fit any image, accomplish the purpose and minimize evidence that it was used at all. Check out These links: http://retouchpro.com/tutorials/?m=show&id=147 http://retouchpro.com/tutorials/?m=show&id=149
A shortcut version, by the same author, known around here as the Degrunge Technique has been mentioned and described recently on some of the beauty retouching threads that are still current. I personally prefer the long version, as it is customizable to a far greater extent. Read 'em all. It's worth it. | 
09-10-2007, 12:45 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1
| | | Re: The demystification of dave hill! let's all help! reading from this thread and other sites...i try to emulate dave hill's effect on both fashion and other type of photography.
Here is my take...
this photo was taken using a off cam external flash, used an ultra wide lens. My friend wanted a different portrait...
used the tips given in this thread... http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1412/...d0fef34d_o.jpg
this one on a pool of fishes... http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1237/...dc3340b8_o.jpg
One thing i notice is that it does not apply to every image, an image with good quality light and sharpness is needed. | 
09-13-2007, 05:48 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 249
| | | Re: The demystification of dave hill! let's all help! Dave Hill has a photo illustration style similar to Jill Greenberg, known as "The Manipulator." They have a formula that works. You mean that's not the original image that comes directly out of the camera? no, just kiddin', but, to me some of the images almost look like slick comic book line drawings that are colored in, same technique. Of course the image quality, lighting and composition are first rate.
steve
I have often wondered myself how they are achieving these techniques in PS | 
09-14-2007, 03:36 AM
| | Member | | Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 31
| | | Re: The demystification of dave hill! let's all help! in the photo side:
for sure there's an underexposure of the ambient light maybe 1 entire stop or more and a wel lit subject by the use of flash for the base shot do you agree with me??
he close a lot the may be f16, f22
Last edited by cli; 09-14-2007 at 03:51 AM.
| 
09-14-2007, 04:30 AM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 774
| | | Re: The demystification of dave hill! let's all help! steveB: Jill Greenbergs pictures are often retouched by Amy Dresser...so....her pictures isn't really hers since everyone loves the effect of the pictures...
gerry | 
09-14-2007, 08:51 AM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: nyc
Posts: 531
| | | Re: The demystification of dave hill! let's all help! Quote:
Originally Posted by superkoax steveB: Jill Greenbergs pictures are often retouched by Amy Dresser...so....her pictures isn't really hers since everyone loves the effect of the pictures...
gerry |
Jill has a lot more control over her retouching than you think.
Last edited by KR1156; 09-14-2007 at 09:02 AM.
| 
09-14-2007, 11:15 AM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 249
| | | Re: The demystification of dave hill! let's all help! Quote:
Originally Posted by superkoax steveB: Jill Greenbergs pictures are often retouched by Amy Dresser...so....her pictures isn't really hers since everyone loves the effect of the pictures...
gerry | I'm sure that is very possible about Amy Dresser working on Jill's work. I first heard about Greenberg when I read and saw some of her images featured in an article in a digital photography magazine. I will review that article and for anyone interested in learning more about Greenberg's work, it appeared in Digital PhotoPro, Sep/Oct 2005 p 60-70. Doesn't seem to be any mention of Amy Dresser at that time, but now in 2007, who knows what she may be doing and hiring to do her post work. I do remember it said Jill still worked a lot with film cameras and then did the retouching herself with masking, D&B. Also in other interviews with Jill, she is asked questions about her post work and stylistic look
Whatever and who ever does the post work, it is quite interesting and now I may have to jump in and experiment with some of these techniques many of you have tried out
steve
Last edited by SteveB2005; 09-14-2007 at 11:27 AM.
| 
09-14-2007, 04:26 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 774
| | | Re: The demystification of dave hill! let's all help! KR: You are right in the control, but I feel that the retouching amy does on Jills picture are so good that the picture itself get's more in the background...Hard to explain in words, but when I see jill greeneberg pictures I see the effect more than the picture itself...
gerry | 
09-14-2007, 04:28 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: nyc
Posts: 531
| | | Re: The demystification of dave hill! let's all help! amys not her only retoucher, and she enhances that effect herself. | 
09-14-2007, 07:36 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 774
| | | Re: The demystification of dave hill! let's all help! KR: r u sure? I've heard other things...everytime Jill greenberg is mentioned amy dresser is also mentioned, so I have drwan my own conclusion really...that she has retouched most of her work...but I haven't been 100% sure...are you?
Cheers for answering
Gerry | 
09-14-2007, 08:12 PM
| | Senior Member | | Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: nyc
Posts: 531
| | | Re: The demystification of dave hill! let's all help! having worked on some stuff, i'm pretty sure.
she shoots a ton of stuff, so it is spread out. |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:56 AM. | |
|