| Notices | Welcome to RetouchPRO . You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload images and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. | | Photo Retouching "Improving" photos, post-production, correction, etc. | 
05-04-2002, 04:09 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
Posts: 919
| | | Scanning tip worth repeating... I know this has been posted in the past, but it's worth repeating.
I scanned a photo that was cracked right across the middle and could see that the repair was going to take a great deal of clonning. Then I remembered this tip that I read a while ago.
I turned the photo a quarter turn and scanned it again and there is much less repair required now.
I hope the attached file will show what I mean. The top strip was scanned with the photo oriented right side up; the bottom strip was scanned after giving the photo a quarter turn.
Hope someone finds this useful,
Margaret | 
05-04-2002, 04:12 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: Upper Penninsula of Michigan
Posts: 1,659
| | | You are right Margaret, this is a tip worth repeating. I like how you added a photo to show the difference. Really emphasizes the difference.
DJ | 
05-04-2002, 04:55 PM
|  | Moderator Patron | | Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Near Seattle, Washington, USA
Posts: 5,678
| | Margaret:
Ditto what DJ said: Pic definitely worth 1000 words here.
I'd heard of / read about the technique of slightly rotating a picture to get better scan results under these circumstances, but until I saw the before / after image, didn't realize there could be that much difference.
Put me down as a believer now. A+.
~DannyR~ | 
05-04-2002, 05:56 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jan 2002 Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 951
| | | WOW! Thanks for the tip Margaret!
I have to admit, I have never heard of this technique, but now that I see this, it seems obvious. | 
05-04-2002, 06:48 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: northwest Indiana, about 45 minutes from Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,821
| | | That's a good one to bring back. I think Sam posted something on that order quite some time ago (but it could have been someone else). So that proves it's worth checking out the old posts.
Ed | 
05-19-2002, 02:35 AM
|  | Member | | Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 33
| |  That's a great tip!
Does anyone have a clue why it works? Could it be something like the light from the scanner hits the picture at a different angle, with less shadow in the new direction?
Gene | 
05-19-2002, 05:46 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
Posts: 919
| | | When I scanned the picture with the deep crease horizontal to the travel of the light source, there were fairly wide strips on either side of the crease that were color distorted.
When I scanned with the crease perpendicular to the light source, there was very little discoloration.
My conclusion is that the light source sort of trips over the crease and leaves a shadow.
I know that's not very scientific, the I've tested it with several photos and always get the same result. I now take more than one scan whenever there are deep creases in a photo.
Take care,
Margaret |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:18 AM. | |
|