RetouchPRO

Go Back   RetouchPRO > Technique > Photo Retouching
Register Blogs FAQ Site Nav Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Photo Retouching "Improving" photos, post-production, correction, etc.

This look without a film camera?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 02-03-2010, 09:57 AM
Kcupcake Kcupcake is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 21
This look without a film camera?

Hey Everyone

I have a photoshop issue that I've been wondering if it's even possible to solve... How would you go about getting these looks (photos below) without using a film camera?

I know Jose Villa (the first 2 photos) is huge into film photography and from what I understand overexposes by a few stops to get the bright wrapping around glow to his subjects, but what if you can't afford to shoot only film with an amazing camera & lens duo... Is it possible to recreate this look?

If Jose Villa's style is too impossible to replicate in digital then how would you go about making a photo look like it came from a film camera without actually coming from one? (The rest of the photo examples)
Attached Images
File Type: jpg ex1.jpg (93.0 KB, 397 views)
File Type: jpg ex2.jpg (72.9 KB, 344 views)
File Type: jpg ex3.jpg (92.3 KB, 265 views)
File Type: jpg ex4.jpg (99.2 KB, 275 views)
File Type: jpg ex8.jpg (85.9 KB, 281 views)
Reply With Quote top
  #2  
Old 02-03-2010, 10:15 AM
flexmanta's Avatar
flexmanta flexmanta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 339
Re: This look without a film camera?

Of course you can. These photos stand out for many things, but not for anything that can't be achieve with easy postproduction to replicate the properties of whatever film he used. It clearly is a saturated finish look. Saturation in the shadows could help you get that look. You can also increase contrast locally with any of the contrast blending modes.. Also, i don't think the first image is over-exposed at all. And, thinking of Ansel Adam's zone system, what part of the image you say is 2 stops above 18% grey, clearly not the dress. It'd be a white blob of nothingness.
Reply With Quote top
  #3  
Old 02-03-2010, 10:47 AM
Kcupcake Kcupcake is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 21
Re: This look without a film camera?

Thats true about the wedding dress. I've just read several places he's known to overexpose his shoots, but possibly not all the time or maybe he has a dark lens and has to compensate? Anyways...

It might be asking too much but would it be possible to throw up an example of how to get this look with what you mentioned and a step-by-step?(eep!)
I've played around with saturation in the past and always just get a mess!

Thanks!
Reply With Quote top
  #4  
Old 02-03-2010, 10:51 AM
flexmanta's Avatar
flexmanta flexmanta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Spain
Posts: 339
Re: This look without a film camera?

Sure, i can do it. Just not now, im really really busy. You give me the photo you want to look like that and ill do my best.
Reply With Quote top
  #5  
Old 02-03-2010, 11:14 AM
Kcupcake Kcupcake is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 21
Re: This look without a film camera?

That would be amazing.
I've included 2 images you can pick from (lights and darks). Hope the size isn't too small since this is all I seem to have on this computer currently.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg pex1.jpg (97.2 KB, 197 views)
File Type: jpg pex2.jpg (95.5 KB, 215 views)
Reply With Quote top
  #6  
Old 02-03-2010, 08:55 PM
Andrew Lawrence Andrew Lawrence is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 102
Re: This look without a film camera?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kcupcake View Post
Hey Everyone

I have a photoshop issue that I've been wondering if it's even possible to solve... How would you go about getting these looks (photos below) without using a film camera?

I know Jose Villa (the first 2 photos) is huge into film photography and from what I understand overexposes by a few stops to get the bright wrapping around glow to his subjects, but what if you can't afford to shoot only film with an amazing camera & lens duo... Is it possible to recreate this look?

If Jose Villa's style is too impossible to replicate in digital then how would you go about making a photo look like it came from a film camera without actually coming from one? (The rest of the photo examples)
I wouldn't say that he overexposes a "few" stops. He might overexpose by a stop but probably not much beyond that. He might also be using transparency film which has amazing color saturation and contrast by nature. I wouldn't suggest over exposing with your digital to try to get the same effect, nor would I suggest underexposing. With digital you would want the perfect/best exposure and then if you want to amp it up, do it in post.

If you notice the sky in the 4th photo with the car and the trees, the sky still has tone in it (the yellow) which can be hard to get from a single digital shot, film has more dynamic range.

My guess is that some of these are shot using a view camera, if you look at the bike photo in the first one, you'll see how it's a really wide angle shot but has a very shallow depth of field. A normal 35mm digital won't be able to produce this look, on a large format camera (8x10 inch film) a 110mm lens would be a wide angle, but it would still have that shallow depth of field that a 110mm telephoto has. See this alec soth photo as a good example of large format: http://blog.lib.umn.edu/raim0007/gws.../alec-soth.jpg

The way you would have to fake this look in photoshop would be to do a lot of selective blurring. Stay away from gaussian blur and try to use something like a lens blur. Then you need to mask it in and out with gradients, so that it gets more blur as the landscape gets farther back in the environment. If you want me to go into detail about how to realistically mask it, let me know.

The bright wrapping around stuff I think is just coming from natural flare and you should be able to get it with digital shooting, but I think its possible just because of the physics difference between film and digital that it might look more elegant on film. I found this too: http://josevillablog.com/2010/01/int...-analog-photo/

However, I do think that - film is going to have a different feel to it than digital no matter what, and you can try to come as close to it as you can but you're just not going to be able to fake it all the way in some cases.
Reply With Quote top
  #7  
Old 02-03-2010, 10:23 PM
Kcupcake Kcupcake is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 21
Re: This look without a film camera?

Oh I understand about the shooting and what he might use (lenses, film, etc) that was never such a wonder to me. It was more about how to duplicate colours and the (what seems to be) flat yet bold tones.

I do know that Ill never be able to get it down packed completely without the use of the same equipment, but to come close is what Im looking for!
Reply With Quote top
  #8  
Old 02-03-2010, 11:45 PM
Andrew Lawrence Andrew Lawrence is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 102
Re: This look without a film camera?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kcupcake View Post
Oh I understand about the shooting and what he might use (lenses, film, etc) that was never such a wonder to me. It was more about how to duplicate colours and the (what seems to be) flat yet bold tones.

I do know that Ill never be able to get it down packed completely without the use of the same equipment, but to come close is what Im looking for!
I think that's what we all struggle with......
I think you have to take in the style that they have as well..... the choice of colors and locations are very important to the feel. As well as how they shoot. I've shot with the same film and cameras as other people and their work turns out looking completely different than my stuff. After looking up more, that guy uses a Contax camera with an 85mm on f/2.0 all of the time, which has a very shallow depth of field.

"Coming close" (as you say) is a hard thing to do, I think that all the tutorials you will find on this are probably going to be complete crap, you could probably find some on achieving the holga/lomo style photos. Film is very unique and it differs from different brands and so on. I find kodak to be warmer, fuji to be cooler, and so on and so on....... and skin just looks different in film than it will ever look in digital. I don't think there's a formula out there that will make it different. It's like someone giving you a package of lemonade powder and telling you to make it taste like real lemons as much as you can..... but with out that raw, tangible material, it's just not going to be the same. Jose talks about how photographers are constantly asking him if there's a way to make digital look like film and that they are spending hours and hours trying to fake it. When he just says, if you really want it that bad you should just shoot it.

Don't get me wrong, not trying to get in a digital vs film issue, because I don't think there is anyway that you could get a film shot to look like a digital shot.
Reply With Quote top
  #9  
Old 02-03-2010, 11:52 PM
Andrew Lawrence Andrew Lawrence is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 102
Re: This look without a film camera?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kcupcake View Post
but what if you can't afford to shoot only film with an amazing camera & lens duo... Is it possible to recreate this look? (The rest of the photo examples)
If you're a hobbyist, but serious about it, then by all means, do what you can to get a film workflow working for you so you can get the images you want.

If you're a professional looking to get film results but can't justify the costs.... realize that digital can be just as expensive as film, and..... by all means, do what you can to get a film workflow working for you so you can get the images you want.

If you're looking for a quick fix, which I think you might be, and I don't blame you, you're not going to find it.

This might be helpful information, are you using a DSLR? Or are you using a point and shoot style camera? Also, are you shooting in RAW?
Reply With Quote top
  #10  
Old 02-04-2010, 10:07 AM
Kcupcake Kcupcake is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 21
Re: This look without a film camera?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew Lawrence View Post
If you're a professional looking to get film results but can't justify the costs.... realize that digital can be just as expensive as film, and..... by all means, do what you can to get a film workflow working for you so you can get the images you want.
The only problem with shooting film where I live is there isn't very many labs that can process E6 6x6 film (which is what I shoot) and absolutely none that process 4x5 (sad). To send them out would cost a ton in s/h fees as well as currency rates. All this is without getting involved in costs of film being shipped here (geez!).

So in the end shooting digital (5D) is much easier for me as it really doesn't end up costing that much in comparison.
I don't believe it's completely impossible to achieve a look close to film. There has GOT to be a way. I'm just curious to see what steps could be taken (and am very curious to see what flexmanta means)
Reply With Quote top
Reply

  RetouchPRO > Technique > Photo Retouching


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Adding A More Realistic Film Grain Effect gmitchel Software 14 08-15-2013 07:57 AM
Film Cross-Processing Presets for Adobe Camera Raw gmitchel Software 0 05-16-2009 03:20 PM
Nikon Camera Control Pro 2.0 (reviews wanted) Doug Nelson Hardware 8 05-03-2009 10:48 PM
Camera Raw in Photoshop chanamagoo Photoshop Help 2 01-12-2009 10:19 PM
Question on a film camera... Rudy627 Photography 2 11-29-2007 04:36 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2016 Doug Nelson. All Rights Reserved