Go Back   RetouchPRO > Technique > Photo Retouching
Register Blogs FAQ Site Nav Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Photo Retouching "Improving" photos, post-production, correction, etc.

Replacing images backgrounds....

Thread Tools
Old 01-15-2012, 10:16 AM
FCP FCP is offline
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 17
Replacing images backgrounds....

I have been re-touching for a few years, I'm good but I don't claim to know it all. One thing that has always annoyed me are clients (photographers) who don't pay any attention to details such as hair assuming it will be taken care of in post. There is nothing more time consuming then fixing fly away/stray hairs.
Also, clients who instead of doing a reshoot tell there subject that they can simply have them removed and placed on another background. Now this is simply enough if the client is shot on a simple plain background like a seamless but if they are shot on location outside with a busy background then its not so simple to replace the background with a plain white or solid background. The technique can often depend on the image so it is trial and error which can be time consuming and most of the time it just looks unnatural. Particularly if its for headshot/portrait usage.

I have three questions:
1. Is it ok to tell them a photographer watch for stray/fly away hairs when shooting? (note: one client is a per image fee base not hourly so time is a factor)
2. Is it ok to tell a client that such a task, like replacing a background, isn't going to work with said image or isn't going to look natural therefor a reshoot is the best solution? Does it look unprofessional and does it make me look incompetent?
3. Is anything and everything always doable? Is it my belief that the answer is no....
Reply With Quote top
Old 01-15-2012, 11:01 AM
Tony W's Avatar
Tony W Tony W is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,281
Re: Replacing images backgrounds....

Interesting questions and I suspect that this can be a difficult one to deal with and still retain your clients good will.

On the one hand to tell or intimate to a photographer/client that they are not paying attention to detail e.g. hair could be seen as an insult to their professionalism!

On the other hand you are being honest and actually giving them advice that will save them money in the long run and affect your pocket as you will not need to do as much work in pp. This assumes that you charged by the time taken to do a job and not by the image - in the latter case you are making life more difficult for yourself and not earning what you should be.

In the case of replacing background once again it is in the photographers financial interest to shoot correctly to minimise the amount of pp you need to do or actually pay more for the time it takes to make the image right.

So my gut feeling on your questions:
1. You can suggest to the photographer that excessive stray/fly away hairs can be troublesome and perhaps suggest that for excessive hairs you may need to consider charging a further fee

2. You can suggest to a client that replacing a background is not going to work for whatever reason including looking unnatural. In a fair world your honesty and integrity should be appreciated in the real world this is not necessarily the case! Remember that if you do work that looks poor for whatever reason either your own skill or the incompetence of the photographer - it will be seen as your fault and lack of professionalism regardless . So I would say yes

3. Some clients may like to hear that everything and anything is doable. For them the answer should be that it is going to cost in time and financial terms to them.

In all cases a degree of tact and diplomacy will be required after knowing and assessing the individual and trying to gauge their likely response!
Reply With Quote top
Old 01-15-2012, 11:22 AM
skoobey skoobey is online now
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,184
Thumbs up Re: Replacing images backgrounds....

I think you should turn down people if they are asking for an inferior product. Becaue, if you don't all you will get is more and more inferior work and at the end of the day your work will suffer as you'll have no good result to show to potential customers.

I often turn down people who are not models yet are keen for me to do their portfolio. Then, when I say that I will have to charge them, and that they will need good stylist and hair/make up artists they feel insulted.

Photographers who pay attention to nothing are not deserving to be in this business and should be turned down for retouching. Retouching is not correcting and you should never do so.

No matter how much work you put into an image, it will never look good if the original input is lacking.
Reply With Quote top
Old 01-17-2012, 03:51 AM
fraiseap fraiseap is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Birmingham UK
Posts: 104
Re: Replacing images backgrounds....

As a photographer I can tell you that, if a retoucher pointed out to me that fly away hairs are a time consuming to deal with, I would not be insulted. I would also be completely comfortable with a retoucher satying to me that shots on white or grey seamless are less time consuming to extract than those with busy backgrounds.

I would, however, be insulted if a retoucher told me that I did not pay enough attention to detail. There is a lot to think about on a shoot and things get forgotten sometimes.

It comes down to the relationship you have with the photographer. Mutual respect always helps. Photographers are used to adjusting what they do to satisfy clients, stylists, etc. However it also depends on the deal for payment. If I am paying a retoucher at an hourly rate then I can pretty much ask for anything (knowing that it will cost me), on the other hand, if I am working with a retoucher to develop both of our portfolios, then it seems reasonable for me to get as much right in the camera as possible.
Reply With Quote top
Old 01-17-2012, 01:31 PM
skoobey skoobey is online now
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,184
Re: Replacing images backgrounds....

I am a photographer that retouches all of my images myself for the time being, as I need to get more in-depth knowledge of Photoshop and know what to expect from an image (can something be done on shoot and what is easier to do achieve in post).

I would never ever ever ever do what most of the lower end photographers do, and that is to send images to retoucher only if something had gone wrong. I would rather re-shoot, and I think this is a professional thing to do.

Fly away hairs and similar things are not really a problem, and they often add to the image, and I think that FCP is referring to untidy hair, of which I shall speak in another theme in Critiques section. Some sloppy photographers just accept that the hair could look fake and do not even bother to fix the hair on the shoot. That is lack of care, and they should be denied.
Reply With Quote top

  RetouchPRO > Technique > Photo Retouching

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Script to center-crop images to a fixed ratio gct13 Photoshop Scripting 24 01-06-2013 03:58 AM
FFT making transparent images Habanero Photo Restoration 3 09-13-2011 11:06 AM
Converting 8 bit images to 16 bit - any benefits? Tony W Software 30 08-13-2011 05:34 AM
Retouching and keywording for stock images charles@jainco Classifieds 0 03-31-2011 05:46 AM
Wedding or event images needed for e-book grygarness Photo Retouching 3 01-18-2011 03:03 AM

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2016 Doug Nelson. All Rights Reserved