| Re: Film vs. Digital I remain with film, for now, but am not concerned with the advent of digital photography. Both formats will fulfill various requirements I'm sure.
The primary concern for me is the longevity of the original image. Digital processes have not entirely addressed the issue of permanence.
I'm sure prints may be archival but there is no permanent storage systems like negatives. Hard drives and CDs just do not cut it. These methods have not been proven archival.
We own a gallery and images are often submitted. Limited edition digital prints are cautiously accepted but we prefer traditional black and white. We find quite a bit of interest in old photos of historic places and people therefore, I am concerned with the loss of records like wedding photos, famous people, etc.
If I require a good permanent image I can only use film, I cannot take the chance with digital's impermanence.
Paul |