[TreesOfMyTime]

Originally Posted by Mike

And for your futher enjoyment:

http://groups.msn.com/Asktheoleproab...ezeltsman.msnw

Zelstman's work is mainly film based, but the lighting and posing techniques are very much worth study!

[Mike]

Originally Posted by TreesOfMyTime

Zelstman's work is mainly film based, but the lighting and posing techniques are very much worth study!

I assume that you mean that there is a difference in lighting and posing techniques depending on the method of image capture, film or digital. Would you give us the reasons for this?

Thank you.

[TreesOfMyTime]

No, that was not my thought. I just pointed out that there is a lot of film related discussion on development etc. Also, younger folks might be put off by the "look and feel" of the hair styles, dress and such. Those styles change but the rules last!

I doubt that he would have done tilted wedding shots though.

[Mike]

Ok, I understand. And I agree with you that there will be those that will look at the hair and clothing and surmise that everything including the real purpose of the article is old and outdated. People with such little imagination leave me wondering why they are working in these fields.

The tilted shots will go away, much like the inset of the heads of the bride and groom looking down at an overall of the ceremony or the couple in the champaign glass did.

[TreesOfMyTime]

Originally Posted by Mike

Ok, I understand. And I agree with you that there will be those that will look at the hair and clothing and surmise that everything including the real purpose of the article is old and outdated. People with such little imagination leave me wondering why they are working in these fields.

The tilted shots will go away, much like the inset of the heads of the bride and groom looking down at an overall of the ceremony or the couple in the champaign glass did.

Be careful we are going to scare away all the young ones and they have so much to offer!