ScubaMargie & MysticalOne, (as well as others, but I'm responding to their posts), you might be interested in reading/viewing the thoughts/images of a photography teacher from my area. I see him more of an inspiration rather than teacher, but that is what excellent teachers do - inspire.
A section on black/white photography (specifically aimed at travel) with thoughts about its limitations and strengths -
http://www.pbase.com/pnd1/black_and_white
From Phil Douglis' page (especially for ScubaMargie since you asked

It's a point worth considering)
"One other point deserves mentioning: when we shoot digitally in color and convert later to black and white, we lose the advantage of actually “seeing” our subject in black and white as we shoot. Most digital cameras allow you to shoot in black and white. It might be worth doing so, just to train your eye to “see” in tones of black and white, instead of in color. However keep in mind that shooting in a black and mode discards color information, so you can’t change your mind later and have that picture in color as well. The answer: if possible, shoot in black and white and then re-shoot in color. You may not be able to capture exactly the same behavior, etc. the second time around, but at least you will have covered all of your bases, and learn more about the differences between the two mediums."
The portal to all his instructional galleries:
From Phil Douglis' PBase website:
http://www.pbase.com/pnd1
"Most
travel photographers start out by making pictures of things to simply describe what they see. I call this the literal travel snapshot. Most travel snapshots are made to preserve private meanings. Many photographers will eventually move on to a second phase – making aesthetically pleasing pictures that enhance what they saw. I call this the “artistic” snapshot - essentially the same as a lovely picture post card or a calendar illustration. This cyberbook does not concern itself with either of these phases. Instead, I demonstrate what goes into a third phase – interpreting the things you see on your travels to express meaning to others. I call these pictures “expressive” images. They are images made for public, rather than private meanings. Expressive photography, like all art, offers universal, and often metaphorical, statements.
What is expressive imagery? It is photography that interprets, rather than describes, what we see to others. It tells a story, going beyond conveying information for its own sake. It becomes metaphorical. One of my most influential teachers, photographer Minor White, taught us that "photographs can be outward expressions of inward states. They are about not just what some thing is, but rather, what else it is." By expressing our own metaphorical point of view about what we see, we can communicate ideas to others, triggering emotional, intellectual, and imaginative responses.
In my view, expressive photography is based upon the three principles I demonstrate in the first three galleries of this cyberbook: Abstraction, Incongruity, and Human Values. Abstraction removes literal, descriptive clutter and hones an image down to its essence and encourages unlimited thinking. Incongruity presents elements that seem to be at odds with their context and creates contrasts and juxtapositions that stimulate both the emotions and the imagination. Human values convey the emotions, beliefs, traditions and knowledge that we understand and share as humans. I suggest that anyone using this cyberbook as a learning tool, study these three galleries before going on to the rest of them.
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScubaMargie I actually found it quite difficult to start with, and still do. ...
Then I saw the old mining piece and thought that that would make a cool shot. I took a few shots and had a look in the LCD and thought that they looked pretty good. There was something about them that I liked, not sure what. I actually turned the camera back to colour mode and got a couple of shots in colour. I must say I prefer the black and white.
Taking photos in black and white is difficult and also interesting. It feels to me like I have stumbled into a new area of photography that I like and would like to learn more. As a result I have bookmarked a couple of sites on the web about B&W photography, to see if I can get my head around it and the challenges it presents.... |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mystical One When I first started taking photo's b&w processing was far cheaper than colour, so that was the medium of choice. Then again, I was only a kid.
When I went to uni, it would have been great to have decided on something a little more artistic than my eventual decision, but I was supposed to be a practical one at the time. Hence, no photography course for me. Most way throughout my life though, I have always found myself looking at images that I felt would make great photographs. Funnily enough, most of these imagined images, were b&w, concentrating on the interplay of light, shadow, & texture. I still have one of those images held very strongly in my mind, a shadow cast by a barred gate on a solid (old) brick wall, topped with razor wire. Unfortunately, the image cannot be captured due to security in the place where it happens forbidding cameras....
I still find myself looking at things and searching for the kind of images that I considered in days of old, thinking how would certain scenes look in monochrome, and sometimes I do shoot b&w, hoping to capture something of the style that I used to only photograph in my mind. I think, though, that the wilderness we are surrounded by, almost demands the use of colour.
On a more base level, I am hoping that maybe I can eke a small living through photography one day, and, again, the market that I would be targeting demands the use of colour, particularly when capturing wilderness scenes. B&w is seen by many as "arty" and whilst it may be appreciated in a gallery setting, one has to develop a reputation first, and, in this area, that demands the use of colour.
Here endeth my rant. |