RetouchPRO

Go Back   RetouchPRO > Technique > Photography
Register Blogs FAQ Site Nav Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read


Photography Both digital and film. Discussions about cameras, gear, exposure, technique, and sharing your photography

My ideal pro camera

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 08-13-2012, 12:08 AM
franko60 franko60 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Posts: 153
My ideal pro camera

Here's the specs for the camera I really want.
1. Large imager. Pixel size exceeding 6 microns. Imager size 6cm x 7cm.
2. Interchangeable lenses from 40mm to 35mm. Apertures obviously as wide as possible but keeping to a reasonable price, say f5.6 through f45.
3. Bellows attachment that fits between body and lens for all lenses. Reasonable movements with image circle sufficient to cover imager at maximum shift/tilt.
4. Fully manual control.Mechanical leaf shutter, preferably in lens but could be between lens and imager as long as it syncs flash at all shutter speeds. Don't need electronics to control programs or image processing. RAW only. Pros don't shoot Auto.
5. PC socket for flash - again electronic control of flash isn't required. If you need it, you're not a pro.
6. Cold shoe to mount wireless synch unit.

I think that's about it. By getting rid of all the electronics required for auto picture taking and image processing and sticking to mechanical functions as far as possible, it should be possible to put the money into imager size and quality to produce a camera that is actually useful to professionals at a reasonable price.
Reply With Quote top
  #2  
Old 08-26-2012, 06:54 AM
Rex Rex is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 33
Re: My ideal pro camera

I know where you are coming from. One of my favourite cameras is my Pentax 645. Not the auto focus version, just the fully manual. Since it has film inserts (not magazine like the Hasselblad), I feel that Pentax missed the mark by not designing a digital insert. The body has all the camera functions inc. the batteries in the handle.

It would not have taken a rocket scientist to design a digital insert so that each frame frame flicked over as the redundant film advancement cogs whirred around. As the camera already has a large user base, an insert could have been a very cost effective investment. A fully manual camera with digital capture; wonderful!

Rex
Reply With Quote top
Reply

  RetouchPRO > Technique > Photography


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mask Pro and removing backgrounds...expert advise FCP Photo Retouching 8 10-23-2014 07:02 PM
Plug-In: Camera Raw 5.7 vickatter Software 3 12-08-2013 06:46 AM
Capture one pro is the only way to go! JDClosser Software 5 03-28-2012 02:27 PM
New Tutorials Using CS5 HDR Pro mistermonday HDR, Panoramas and Tone Mapping 7 09-20-2011 02:54 AM
My photos are darker in computer than in camera santoro80 Input/Output/Workflow 4 10-22-2010 10:53 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright © 2016 Doug Nelson. All Rights Reserved