rgb vs cmyk
I am new to the site and loving it!
I am avidly following up on and tracking down all references to extraction, masks and clipping paths. Most of what I have found so far has been very informative and interesting (some very confusing and way above my head on first reading).
I have noticed something that confuses me, namely:
evryone (or most of you) seems to work in rgb, as opposed to cmyk.
Is rgb better for making masks?
Do you work in rgb because photoshop lets you do more with it, or because the colour gamut is wider?
I work in cmyk, so as to check colours for print (we use a profile also).
I prefer cmyk - I can see the colour seps better in my mind's eye.
Do you suggest that I switch to rgb?
thanks for all the help so far and still to come.
There are few workflow advantages in working with RGB over CMYK, and fewer with each new PS version. There are some theoretical advantages in both directions, but it boils down to: if you're more comfortable in CMYK, especially if 100% of your work will end up being printed using CMYK, stick with CMYK.
RGB is more popular because most consumer and prosumer output devices require it (and, of course, if your outputting for screen RGB is a necessity). RGB has a wider color gamut (more available colors) than CMYK, but if CMYK is your primary output target this could actually be a liability.
And converting from CMYK to RGB is much less problematic than the reverse.
For some images, even if I'm going to work in rgb, I'll send a copy into cmyk. Often you find various colors to be more isolated on one or another cmyk plate. The lack of a black separation in rgb means that each plate simply has more overall information, and hence, less specific colors to focus in on. Further isolating colors in cmyk using calculations in subtract mode is usually far more successful than in RGB.
Also, keep lab in mind. The fact that the a and b channels so specifically target blue/yellow and red/green (well, magenta/green) allows the blending sliders to separate or remove specific colors much more effectively than either rgb or cmyk. If a red region requires masking, removing green from the a channel and blue from the b channel can leave you with your red object isolated in about 10 seconds. Adding an empty layer and then merging the two yeilds a transparency selection that, when moved back to your original file, works easily as well as a mask drawn by hand, or extracted from a channel.
okay, you lost me on the lab colour stuff...
I don't really understand what lab colour is or how to use it.
thanks for the other input, both of you.
I work for a printier and he uses cmyk for the printing end of the business for plates and rgb for the color copier. We have an epson geclee large formate that takes rgb better that cmyk. Just my two cent. When I started designing pictures it was in cmyk but the xerox tec told me to use rgb.
http://www.dgrin.com and go to the thread: "The Digital Darkroom - Software"
They are taking Dan Margulis' book on working in L*a*b* chapter by chapter and having a discussion on it.
go to 'Books' and there is Chapter 2 and Chapter 9 for you to check out if you like.
Some people like Dan's writing style, some don't. Some agree with him, some don't.
Each color space L*a*b*, RGB, and CMYK have their own strengths and weaknesses to varying degrees.
A few years ago, Don Hutcheson 'converted' me to working in RGB. He had a series of sample files and he made me a believer that RGB was a better general working space than CMYK.
There are color and tonal adjustments possible in an RGB working space that you can't achieve if you try to do it in CMYK.
We ultimately output to CMYK but I do the majority of my work in RGB, then I'll finish out some fine tuning in CMYK.
I've been tinkering in L*a*b* for a little while and find it quite impressive.
thanks for this, Richard.
lots of food for thought.
I get what you're saying about rgb colourspace, it's just that besides being counterintuitive to me (which I'm sure I could train myself out of), I actually work in repro, so I am dealing with images that have alredy been converted from rgb to cmyk. Much of the time I am deep-etching part of an image that I have already colour corrected. Hard to explain.
The final output context is in a magazine; two images are superimposed - one deep-etched, one not, so that the above image (the deep-etched one) has ares that stick out around the frame of the lower one.
Am I making sense- it sounds very garbled to me.
The point is that there are two images - both must have the same colour.
I could convert both back to rgb and then do changes, but will I actually be gaining anything? (Images originally rgb from scans or digital photos)
thanks for your help
If it for a magazine they usually work in cmyk. When I first started at the print shop I worked in rgb and sent work to the back room and was told right away that it must be in cmyk.
One can make adjustments in both color modes assuming you are working in a color managed workflow and have accurate monitor and device profiles. That last part can't be emphasized enough.
RGB first, then convert to CMYK and check your CMYK numbers in the questionable areas and adjust to taste.
This link is good reading for those on the fence deciding whether RGB or CMYK is a better general working space. Click on 'RGB Arguments' for the full PDF download.
Last edited by RichardBrackin; 10-12-2005 at 09:10 AM.
|Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|RGB CMYK LAB and Dan Margulis !||Hello_taipan||Photo Retouching||79||09-19-2011 08:01 AM|
|convert from RGB to CMYK||sylvia1065||Input/Output/Workflow||2||03-31-2006 09:29 PM|
|RGB to CMYK||sylvia1065||Input/Output/Workflow||9||01-26-2006 07:10 PM|
|good old rgb cmyk prob||mac||Image Help||3||02-17-2005 09:37 PM|
|CMYK vs. RGB (long winded)||dtrayers||Hidden Power Support||5||04-08-2003 09:28 PM|