Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David M ......but I get confused when I read about "the blue channel had a lot of damage" etc.. |
If you are retouching a
coloured photo the blue channel is the least important. As such, it often gets badly preserved in image treatment (JPEG conversion, scanning etc.). Luckily it's easy to fix - just a general surface blur will usually suffice.
If you are working on a
Black/White photo (restoration) then you have three colour channels when you only need one greyscale channel. So, in this case, you can pick and mix the good ones and throw away the bad ones.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David M When I switch an image to lab colour,and check the channels,to me all the channel`s looked damaged i.e if there were spots on the photo,it comes through on all the channels. |
If the damage is basically in the Blue channel, then switching to LAB will definitely make things worse as the noisy information from the Blue channel gets used when generating all three LAB channels.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by David M Sorry I know I sound like an idiot. |
No, idiots are the one's that don't ask.
Channel trick (for portraits)....
Look at the three channels in turn:
RED: smooth glow in the skin areas;
GREEN: looks like a black/white photo;
BLUE: grunge.
Set up a channel mixer layer, mark the monochrome box, use Red 30%, Green 60%, Blue 10% and set the blending mode to Luminosity. (Nothing happened yet)
If you increase the Red mix (decreasing the others accordingly) you get a smoother look; increasing the Blue it will get harsher.
(The two examples attached are rather exaggerated)
Rô