It isn't elegant and it might take some experimenting to get it right, but for me is better that slightly green.
Two nearly perfect methods, both better than Photoshop workaround techniques (with desaturation, layers etc) according to people who have gotten good with PS techniques :
1) Just select "black ink only" under Preferences. It'll do exactly that, very nicely, though it'll first tell you that you'll be unhappy with the results. But it's a stupid machine and it's wrong. It just uses your two Epson black pigments, like you'd hope.
2) Download QTRgui http://www.sbillard.org/Shareware/QTRgui.htm
It's wonderful shareware that gives you B&W tone control from cool to sepia/warm using Epson's standard pigments. It's free until you admit to yourself that you like it, then you will of course pay the developer his $50 because you're a good person.
QTRgui requires you to copy your file into a TIFF and print from that...a lossless step and instantaneous.
These both produce very real B&W. The only real disadvantage to "black only" is that it can sometimes look a little 35mm-grainy in smooth highlights. Most people would never notice or would actually like it. QTRgui gives you tone control and perhaps smoother skintones...or perhaps not.
Epson 2200 b+w unwanted sepia cast
Thank you both, Danny Raphael and westsidemaurice.
I'll give your suggestions a try.
|Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)|
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Scanner and Printer Purchase||smallworld||Work/Jobs||3||12-27-2005 07:10 PM|
|Buying a reliable photo printer||Gerald McClaren||Hardware||2||09-03-2005 06:16 AM|
|Epson Stylus Photo 1200 & r200||imrtun||Input/Output/Workflow||2||06-06-2005 10:24 AM|
|OVERALL which is better? Canon i9100 or Epson Stylus Pro 2200.||NeX||Hardware||2||12-10-2003 01:39 PM|
|Epson 2200 Stylus Photo Printer||Doug Nelson||Hardware||13||06-28-2002 07:56 AM|