![]() |
| |||||||
| Software Photoshop, Paintshop Pro, Painter, etc., and all their various plugins. Of course, you can also discuss all other programs, as well. |
| | Thread Tools |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Photoshop posterization problem 16bit RGB, Photoshop cs4, monitor nec 2190uxi, monitor is two weeks ago calibrated, gpu nvidia 8800gt. Hope for your help. |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Photoshop posterization problem what color space are you in? the broader the color space the more posterisation you will get. reset your brush settings in the brush palettes just in case also |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Re: Photoshop posterization problem monitor is calibrated, so there is my own color space for this monitor. anyway if i change it to srgb result is the same. Brush reset too doesnt help... |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Photoshop posterization problem I am not sure how posterization with brushes work, but posterization does imply that you reduce number of colors, actually way less then 256, more like 10 or 15. |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Re: Photoshop posterization problem Posterization? Where? |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Re: Photoshop posterization problem May be posterization is not the right word, i dont know the name of this effect. |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
| Re: Photoshop posterization problem I mean, I don't see posterization in the attachmed image. |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
| Re: Photoshop posterization problem By the way, monitors sometimes shows posterization when the zoom size is not 100%. Better try doing a print, prints have much more tonal values than monitors. If you see posterization in the print, then you have a problem. |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
| Re: Photoshop posterization problem My monitor shows allot of tonal values, and this problem appears 2-3 weeks ago.. |
|
#10
| ||||
| ||||
| Re: Photoshop posterization problem The attached file looks pure white to me. A more detailed description of your workflow and the issue itself could be very helpful. |
|
#11
| |||
| |||
| Re: Photoshop posterization problem Decu, The posterization has 19 perfect concentric circles from 236 to 256 with each concentric ring incremented by a value of 1 over the previous ring.. The first thought that comes to mind is that someone applied a radial gradient to a layer and then did Image>Adjust>Posterize with a value of 19. However, there could also have been many other ways that could have caused this effect. To know exactly what caused it would probably require more detail of the workflow and what was done to the image. For those who can not see the effect, you probably need to recalibrate your Monitors or perhaps you are using LCD monitors that can not be calibrated in that range. Regards, Murray |
|
#12
| |||
| |||
| Re: Photoshop posterization problem Other things that come to mind are combination of camera lense and jpg processing by the camera. It could also be a bad / low quality scanner. But again there may be many other explanations. So more info would be useful. Regards, Murray |
|
#13
| |||
| |||
| Quote:
These are professional monitors 16 bits made (for color and gray scale images) with a gamut a bit over Adobe RGB 1998 and they cost an eye of the face: http://www.eizo.com/global/ but still 72 PPI. |
|
#14
| |||
| |||
| Re: Photoshop posterization problem Quote:
I didn't do anything with the image, its just a white background with 19% gray brush point. Try to do this on your PC, is the result the same? |
|
#15
| |||
| |||
| Re: Photoshop posterization problem Photoshop brush is not the best thing in terms of accuracy. |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Please help with calibration problem | Zapote | Input/Output/Workflow | 7 | 01-20-2009 06:54 PM |
| Photoshop elements 2.0 help please? | HoosierDaddy | Photoshop Elements Help | 2 | 09-04-2008 08:09 AM |
| HELP with a filter problem | polskey | Software | 2 | 05-30-2008 09:43 AM |
| Photoshop 2.0 elements help please. | HoosierDaddy | Image Help | 2 | 04-21-2008 07:06 PM |
| URGENT : PHOTOSHOP CS2 2 GIGs ram still not enough | camarosource | Photoshop Help | 12 | 03-04-2008 02:03 AM |