![]() |
| |||||||
| Software Photoshop, Paintshop Pro, Painter, etc., and all their various plugins. Of course, you can also discuss all other programs, as well. |
| | Thread Tools |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Adaptive or Wrong techniques I was selected for a project to scan over 1500 negatives at a Library with scanning procedures already in place. Currently I'm at the 1000 mark and overtime have changed the procedure in which the scanning was done in order to produce a better picture. Now I want to ask myself and the community, which I've often searched for advice, are these techniques I've adapted wrong or is there a better way. I'm currently using Photoshop 5.5 and ScanMaker III with ScanWizard 32bit. One procedure was with ScanWizard. I switched to "Positive Transparency" instead of "Negative Film" for capturing negatives, and then invert the image in Photoshop. With this change, I found scanning is much quicker in acquiring the image, computer is less strained, certain negative media types come into Photoshop ten-fold in quality while others don’t change and working with “Levels” is much easier to do. The second change I made was how I use the "Levels". I use the Marquee tool to select all the non-damage potions and relevant information of the picture, call-up "Auto-Level", save the configuration, “ESC” “Auto-Level” and then apply the Saved “Level” to the whole picture. Since I am working to preserve history and also working in volume. I can’t crop out the borders and not shouldn’t fix damaged parts of the image. So when I call up the “Levels” I have all this mis-information. Using the technique described above I is able to create beautiful pictures with minimal thought. So am I crazy or not schooled properly being better techniques out there. Thanks Revere. |
|
#2
| ||||
| ||||
| These are both techniques I've seen recommended various places, so it looks like you're off to a good start reinventing them for yourself! |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| There have been many times in my life where I've come up with weird ways of solving problems and someone else comes along and shows me a 1-step version of what I've done, so I figured I better ask. Thanks for the reply |
|
#4
| ||||
| ||||
| Lots of different ways to do things in Photoshop. If they work they are not wrong. On the levels point I think I would just bring up levels and hold down the alt/opt key while moving the white traingle thingy and the balck triangle thingy - you can see when you are going from damage to image information and that would be one step instead of 2 if I understood your post ... not always gaurenteed Roger |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
| Thanks I'll give that a try. |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Professional Ret. Techniques in commercials | pure | Work/Jobs | 33 | 07-03-2007 12:50 PM |
| What did I do wrong? | John_D | Critiques | 3 | 04-29-2007 10:57 PM |
| Free e-book: Photoshop eBook: 50 Fast Photoshop 7 Techniques | DannyRaphael | Non-RetouchPRO Resources | 8 | 01-24-2006 07:39 AM |
| proper technique(s) ? :dizzy: | cisco | Photo Restoration | 1 | 12-07-2004 12:26 PM |
| Learning different techniques | sage150 | Critiques | 2 | 11-01-2003 11:39 PM |