| Notices | Welcome to RetouchPRO . You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload images and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us. | | Software Photoshop, Paintshop Pro, Painter, etc., and all their various plugins. Of course, you can also discuss all other programs, as well. | |
View Poll Results: Do You Use Neat Image | |
No
|    | 60 | 30.30% | |
Yes, Demo Version
|    | 56 | 28.28% | |
Yes, Home Version
|    | 13 | 6.57% | |
Yes, Home Plus Version (has PhotoShop Plugin)
|    | 9 | 4.55% | |
Yes, Pro Version
|    | 5 | 2.53% | |
Yes, Pro Plus Version (has PhotoShop Plugin)
|    | 55 | 27.78% | 
04-11-2005, 05:07 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 494
| | I just purchased Neat Image Home+ last week. The plug-in version is a huge convenience - and means if you want you can apply the filter to sections of an image, a particular layer etc while still in PSD which is really handy. And you have all the advantages within photoshop of undo, fade etc.
Can we include a test sample with paper texture in our 'noise filter shoot out' as well? (Happy to supply one if needed)
Elle, you can buy Neat Image at http://www.neatimage.com/purchase.html | 
04-11-2005, 05:30 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Lancashire
Posts: 927
| | Caitlin thank you for the link | 
04-11-2005, 08:26 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Flower Mound, Texas
Posts: 343
| | | After trying a number of noise removal softwares, I have come to the conclusion that Noisware makes the best solution to the problem. Its fast, accurate, easy to use and cheap.
Chris | 
04-12-2005, 03:47 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Los Angeles, CA.
Posts: 130
| | ??? And what about GRAIN SURGERY??? I tought it was the best Noise removal plugin... http://www.visinf.com/gs/ps/ | 
04-16-2005, 02:26 AM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 494
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by arcadhia | Looks interesting - but a whole lot more expensive than Neat Image! | 
04-16-2005, 12:30 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Flower Mound, Texas
Posts: 343
| | | Grain Surgery is good, but overly complicated in what it needs to get done.
Noisware Pro is as good if not better, but much simpler to use. It attacks noise from amany different directions and tells you where the worst noise is in the image so that you don't need to affect that portion. It also very quickly gives you a "Variations" choice to start with if you need it.
Chris | 
05-19-2005, 02:12 PM
|  | Junior Member | | Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 11
| | | use ASF only | 
05-25-2005, 07:25 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Canada
Posts: 8
| | | Neat Image V5 First post here, new version of Neat Image is out. Seems to be a improvement over previous version for as much as I have used it so far. | 
06-14-2005, 04:58 AM
|  | Member | | Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Sydney - Australia
Posts: 80
| | With all the discussion about different noise reduction software that seems to have arisen, I thought this may be of interest. It compares the different types available. Some of it is out of date, but generally a good overview and examples for comparison. http://www.michaelalmond.com/Articles/noise.htm
Paris | 
06-14-2005, 05:34 AM
|  | Junior Member | | Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Denmark
Posts: 6
| | | Supposedly the new Neat Image 5.0 is a huge step forward in noise reduction. I haven't tested it out myself so I am not sure. | 
10-11-2005, 04:06 AM
| | Junior Member | | Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2
| | | pro + , i was using NoiseNinja but now I prefer NeatImage
the plugin in Adobe is very praticle, i normally prefer corel photopaint but no plugins for it | 
10-11-2005, 01:37 PM
|  | Moderator | | Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: somewhere over there
Posts: 6,492
| | i used to use neat image a lot, but since psp 10 i've been using its 'digital camera noise removal' more. very similar to neat image and allows for multiple sampling areas within the same scan.
Craig | 
11-13-2005, 09:01 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 472
| | | I used to use Noise Ninja a lot, but since I got the hang of the PSPX NR tool (was in PSP9 as well), it's really superior for most situations. Amazingly smooth results combined with excellent detail preservation. It's also got an excellent user interface for protecting certain color ranges from NR.
I still use Noise Ninja (plugin version) for images that are really bad (such as when I'm trying to stretch my camera's ISO by intentionally underexposing shots and then brightening them in Paintshop).
If Corel decides to allow the PSPX NR tool to have noise profiles, I think Noise Ninja and Neat Image will be in trouble. NN and NI still have one other advantage--they run much faster.
Bart | 
11-14-2005, 09:55 AM
|  | Moderator Patron | | Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Near Seattle, Washington, USA
Posts: 5,622
| | Quote: |
Originally Posted by irrik i normally prefer corel photopaint but no plugins for it | Plugins are generally written to Photoshop standards. Programs like Photo-Paint, Paintshop Pro, etc. are written to so they can use plugins conforming to these standards.
Unless a plugin specifically excludes Photo-Paint, I'll bet there's a high likelihood it would work. Can't hurt to try.
I have a separate folder for third party plugins, which allows me to easily share them between Photoshop and Corel Painter. Should be the same deal for Photo-Paint. | 
03-11-2006, 09:21 PM
|  | Senior Member | | Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: LA area
Posts: 322
| | Just yesterday I did a little chart comparing the various noise-reducing plug-ins on a 100% size detail from a 35mm scanned image. In my experience with this particular image, Noise Ninja did the best job, followed closely by Noiseware, Neat Image and Digital GEM Pro. Some others merely turned the grain to mush in the name of reduction. http://www.plugsnpixels.com/misc/noisechart.jpg
I did not try Grain Surgery (I have it, but to install it requires quitting all running apps, and that's never convenient unless you plan ahead...).
I don't have any digital-source files that are that noisy, except for a few long exposures of a distant forest fire at night. Again, Noise Ninja and Noiseware did the best job on it.
Mike |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:24 PM. | |
|