No announcement yet.

How far is to far?


  • cricket1961
    started a blog post How far is to far?

    How far is to far?

    Recently I was working on an image for a client. I was doing my normal everyday skin work to some models who had devastating skin. As I was working, a question that a attendee to my Las Vegas retouching class asked popped into my mind.

    How do you know when to much has been done? Is there ever a clear way to know when to stop retouching an image?

    Its a great question and one that a lot of retouchers ponder over probably daily. It is also a question that has no easy answer.

    Some Photographers like freckles and some don't. Is the mole on the check supposed to be there? Is it the Models trademark? Does smooth skin mean NO texture or pores? It is also not necessary to remove ALL the hair on a face in hi-end retouching. As long as it is just light peach fuzz though!

    First thing that comes to mind is that you do whatever the Photographer wants. He does after all have creative control over the image. Sometimes along with a creative director. Either way, the RETOUCHER has little to say in the matter unfortunately.

    Unless the Retoucher has a long standing relationship with the Photographer or Creative Director, the retoucher needs to just do what is asked and try to get a feel over time for what the final goal is. This can take quite a while, sometimes a couple of years, very rarely in a couple of months. At that point the retoucher can voice thoughts over artistic direction and they might be listened to.

    One thing that surprises me a lot, even after all my years in the business, is that sometimes the Photographer (rarely) and often a Creative Director gets so used to "crappy" retouching that when they get good retouching they don't know what to do. All of a sudden they are seeing on FIRST show what they usually see after the THIRD or FOURTH show. And this throws them for a loop because they FEEL THAT THEY NEED to mark something up. They will study the image for a while, and finally mark up something that is not really wrong with the image but starts to lean the picture back towards what they were so used to getting. And didn't really like, hence the use of a new retoucher. Call it their normal comfort zone.

    So now an image that looks good and needs minor work has headed down the road to looking way over retouched. Something that is different than the original intention.

    This has happened to me to many times over the years and has lead to some images that I am not so proud of. But it is a reality in the industry. It has also lead me to make sure that I get as much information about what needs to be done ahead of time. Lack of direction and wrong assumptions are very bad practices in Retouching.

    • shellby
      shellby commented
      Editing a comment
      I find that if there are a load of images to do say over a week or two for one client, at the start of the week you get lots of mark-ups BUT as the deadline nears the mark-ups become less as they know time is running out!

    • cricket1961
      cricket1961 commented
      Editing a comment
      Sometimes that is definitely true Shelby. I have found that that is the case mostly with Photographers and Art Directors who have been in the business for a while and have a clue.

    • Markzebra
      Markzebra commented
      Editing a comment
      Yep, the ones that are newer and think that Photoshop is just a question of pushing some buttons, "lets try it out smoother even, we'll see what it looks like, then you can still take it back if we've gone too far" -"oh forgot to say, take her hair off her shoulder, and we need it for tonight". Don't realise they are compromising the quality of what they are going to get with last minute instructions.

      Had a job weekend before last where somehow found I'd agreed amoung other things to do 60 composite retouches in a weekend! was up all night. Try and make sure you still get payed by the hour.
    You must be logged in to post a comment.

Related Topics


  • drode
    If it's not good, I don't want to fix it
    by drode
    This was a quote from Jay Maisel in a recent video with Scott Kelby. It struck me as profound on two levels.

    First and most obvious was the idea that one should start with a quality image and go from there. One will rarely take a poor image and make it great and a mediocre final image...
    07-26-2011, 11:37 AM
  • cricket1961
    Quick Fixes, or Anything can be done easier, right
    by cricket1961
    Sometimes I wonder about some of the retouching I see in magazines. There is some really awesome stuff out there. Images that have really had some great thought put into them right from the start. And I mean from the start with the creative director and not the retouching.

    Every image...
    11-20-2007, 09:52 PM
  • nathanfrank
    Retouching Tests
    by nathanfrank
    I live in Brooklyn and am just beginning to look for work as a retoucher. A successful retoucher friend offered to introduce me to a studio he used to work for. He mentioned that they test you to see if you have the chops. For those who've been there/done that, any advice as to what is generally in...
    07-14-2015, 08:55 PM
  • FCP
    Replacing images backgrounds....
    by FCP
    I have been re-touching for a few years, I'm good but I don't claim to know it all. One thing that has always annoyed me are clients (photographers) who don't pay any attention to details such as hair assuming it will be taken care of in post. There is nothing more time consuming then fixing fly away/stray...
    01-15-2012, 10:16 AM
  • skoobey
    Race to the bottom and other misconceptions
    by skoobey
    So, there is this constant talk of how everything is a race to the bottom, how everyone is replaceable etc.

    Well, I would have to disagree completely. Every country has an industry that is dominant compared to the same industry in another country. So, yes Indians are the best darn programmers,...
    04-23-2015, 10:31 AM